Category: Immuno Oncology

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2020: First Line KEYTRUDA® Superior to Chemotherapy in Metastatic MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 147,950 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2020 and about 53,200 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23. The majority of CRC cases (about 75 %) are sporadic whereas the remaining 25 % of the patients have family histories of the disease. Only 5-6 % of patients with CRC with a family history background are due to inherited mutations in major CRC genes, while the rest are the result of accumulation of both genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications of several genes.Testing-for-MicroSatellite-Instability-and-MisMatch-Repair-Deficiency

The DNA MisMatchRepair (MMR) system is responsible for molecular surveillance and works as an editing tool that identifies errors within the microsatellite regions of DNA and removes them. Defective MMR system leads to MSI (Micro Satellite Instability) and hypermutation, triggering an enhanced antitumor immune response. MSI is therefore a hallmark of defective/deficient DNA MisMatchRepair (dMMR) system and occurs in 15% of all colorectal cancers. Defective MMR can be a sporadic or heritable event. Approximately 65% of the MSI colon tumors are sporadic and when sporadic, the DNA MMR gene is MLH1. Defective MMR can manifest as a germline mutation occurring in MMR genes including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. This produces Lynch Syndrome often called Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Carcinoma – HNPCC, an Autosomal Dominant disorder that is often associated with a high risk for Colorectal and Endometrial carcinoma, as well as several other malignancies including Ovary, Stomach, Small bowel, Hepatobiliary tract, Brain and Skin. MSI is a hallmark of Lynch Syndrome-associated cancers. MSI tumors tend to have better outcomes and this has been attributed to the abundance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in these tumors from increase immunogenicity. These tumors therefore are susceptible to blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors. MSI testing is performed using a PCR based assay and MSI-High refers to instability at 2 or more of the 5 mononucleotide repeat markers and MSI-Low refers to instability at 1 of the 5 markers. Patients are considered Micro Satellite Stable (MSS) if no instability occurs. MSI-L and MSS are grouped together because MSI-L tumors are uncommon and behave similar to MSS tumors. Tumors considered MSI-H have deficiency of one or more of the DNA MMR genes. MMR gene deficiency can be detected by ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC). NCCN Guidelines recommend MMR or MSI testing for all patients with a history of Colon or Rectal cancer. Unlike Colorectal and Endometrial cancer, where MSI-H/dMMR testing is routinely undertaken, the characterization of Lynch Syndrome across heterogeneous MSI-H/dMMR tumors is unknown.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the tumor-specific effector T cells. The FDA in 2017 granted accelerated approval to KEYTRUDA® for patients with advanced MSI-High or dMMR solid tumors, that have progressed following prior treatment, and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This has led to routine MSI-H/dMMR testing in advanced solid tumors.

KEYNOTE-177 is an International, multicenter, randomized open-label, Phase III trial conducted, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KEYTRUDA® versus Standard-of-Care (SOC) chemotherapy, as first-line therapy for dMMR or MSI-H metastatic ColoRectal Cancer (mCRC). In this study, a total of 307 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC as determined locally, and with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line treatment with KEYTRUDA® 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 2 years (N=153) or investigator’s choice of mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFIRI every 2 weeks, with or without Bevacizumab or Cetuximab (N=154). Chemotherapy regimens were chosen prior to randomization. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or completion of 35 cycles (for KEYTRUDA® only). The median patient age was 63 years and both treatment groups were well balanced. The co-Primary endpoints of the study were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Key Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Safety. Patients with confirmed disease progression on chemotherapy were given the option to crossover, to receive treatment with KEYTRUDA®. The median follow up was 28 months.

It was noted that KEYTRUDA® was superior to chemotherapy with a median PFS of 16.5 months versus 8.2 months for chemotherapy (HR=0.60; P=0.0002). The 12 and 24-months PFS rates were 55.3% and 48.3% with KEYTRUDA® versus 37.3% and 18.6% with chemotherapy, respectively. The confirmed ORR was 43.8% with KEYTRUDA® versus 33.1% with chemotherapy and the median Duration of Response was not reached in the KEYTRUDA® group and was 10.6 months in the chemotherapy group. Following disease progression, 36% of patients assigned to the chemotherapy group crossed over to the KEYTRUDA® group. This study is being continued to evaluate OS. Grade 3-5 treatment related Adverse Event rates were 22% in the KEYTRUDA® arm and 66% in the chemotherapy group.

The authors concluded that when compared to chemotherapy, first-line therapy with KEYTRUDA® provided a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in Progression Free Survival, among patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, with fewer treatment-related Adverse Events. The authors added that KEYTRUDA® should be the new standard of care for this patient group.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-177 study. Andre T, Shiu K-K, Kim TW, et al. J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr LBA4)

FDA Approves Chemotherapy-Free First Line Immunotherapy Combination in Advanced NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on May 15, 2020, approved OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) in combination with YERVOY® (Ipilimumab), as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), whose tumors express PD-L1(1% or more), as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) or Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) genomic tumor aberrations. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 228, 820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the immune system T cells. Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors include CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152) and PD-1(Programmed cell Death 1). Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the T cells. OPDIVO® is presently approved for treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC and progression on or after Platinum-based chemotherapy. YERVOY® is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks Immune checkpoint protein/receptor CTLA-4.

The present FDA approval was based on CheckMate-227, which is an open-label, multi-part, global, Phase III trial in which OPDIVO® based regimens were compared with Platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with first line advanced NSCLC, across non-squamous and squamous tumor histologies. In Part 1 of this trial, there were 2 cohorts– Part 1a in which OPDIVO® plus low dose YERVOY® (N=396) or OPDIVO® monotherapy (N=396) was compared with chemotherapy alone (N=397), in patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 expression of 1% or more and Part 1b in which OPDIVO® plus low dose YERVOY® (N=187) or OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy (N=177) was compared with chemotherapy alone (N=186), in patients whose tumors did not express PD-L1 (less than 1%). (In Part 2 of this trial, OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 expression. Part 2 did not meet its Primary endpoint for Overall Survival for OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, and is published elsewhere). It should be noted that when this trial was launched, chemotherapy along with immunotherapy or immunotherapy alone was not approved for the front-line treatment of NSCLC. Therefore, dual immunotherapy combination was not compared with current standards of care such as chemotherapy plus immunotherapy.

OPDIVO® was administered at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and in the combination arm, YERVOY® was administered at 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. When administered with chemotherapy, OPDIVO® was administered at 360 mg every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by histology, and treatment was administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or administered for 2 years for immunotherapy. There were two Co-primary endpoints in Part 1 for OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® versus chemotherapy: Overall survival (OS) in patients whose tumors express PD-L1 (assessed in patients enrolled in Part 1a) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) in patients with TMB of 10 mut/Mb or more, across the PD-L1 spectrum (assessed in patients enrolled across Parts 1a and 1b). The minimum follow up for the Primary endpoint was 29 months. Both Part 1a and Part 1b groups met their Primary endpoints.

In the Part 1a cohort with PD-L1 expression of 1% or more, the Overall Survival was significantly longer with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY®, compared to chemotherapy. The median Overall Survival was 17.1 months in the Immunotherapy combination group compared to 14.9 months in the chemotherapy group (HR=0.79; P=0.007), with a 2-year OS rates of 40.0% and 32.8%, respectively. Progression Free Survival, Objective Response Rates and Duration of Response were all greater with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination, compared to chemotherapy. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 5.1 months in the OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® group and 5.6 months in the platinum-doublet chemotherapy group (HR=0.82). Confirmed Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 36% and 30% respectively. Median Duration of Response was 23.2 months in the OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® group and 6.2 months in the platinum-doublet chemotherapy group. In the Part 1b cohort with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%, Overall Survival benefit was again observed with the OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination, compared with chemotherapy, with a median duration of 17.2 months with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® and 12.2 months with chemotherapy. Among all the patients in the trial, the median duration of OS was 17.1 months with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® and 13.9 months with chemotherapy. Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related Adverse Events across all patients was 33% in those treated with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination and 36% with chemotherapy.

It was concluded that first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, with a combination of two immunotherapy drugs, improves Overall Survival, compared to chemotherapy, independent of the PD-L1 expression level, and offers a chemotherapy-free first line treatment option for a subset of NSCLC patients, leaving chemotherapy for later lines of therapy.

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2020-2031.

FDA Approves KEYTRUDA® for BCG-Unresponsive, High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on January 8, 2020, approved KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) for the treatment of patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive, high-risk, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) with Carcinoma In Situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumors, who are ineligible for or have elected not to undergo cystectomy.

The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 81,400 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed in the US and about 17,980 patients will die of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but is less common in women and the average age at the time of diagnosis is 73. Approximately 50% of all bladder cancers are non-invasive or in situ cancers. Patients with high-risk, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer that has become unresponsive to BCG treatment, are often given the treatment option of radical cystectomy, which includes removing the entire urinary bladder and a prostatectomy for men or total hysterectomy in women. While highly curative, this surgical procedure carries substantial risk for morbidity and mortality, and can negatively impact patient’s quality of life. Further, a significant proportion of patients are medically ineligible for a radical cystectomy, and even if eligible, refuse surgery and opt for other less effective treatments, which could compromise outcomes.

KEYTRUDA® is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. KEYTRUDA® is presently approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for Cisplatin-containing chemotherapy or for those with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, based on its durable antitumor activity in this patient group. Upregulation of the PD-1 pathway has been observed in BCG-resistant NMIBC, suggesting that KEYTRUDA® may be of benefit in this group of patients.

This new FDA approval for KEYTRUDA® was based on the KEYNOTE-057 study, which is a multicenter, single-arm trial that enrolled 148 patients with high-risk NMIBC, of whom 96 patients had BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary tumors. BCG-unresponsive high-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer was defined as persistent disease despite adequate BCG therapy, disease recurrence after an initial tumor-free state following adequate BCG therapy, or T1 disease following a single induction course of BCG. Eligible patients had received adequate BCG therapy and were unable/unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy. All patients had undergone TransUrethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) to remove resectable disease. Patients with residual Carcinoma In Situ, not amenable to complete resection were permitted. Patients received KEYTRUDA® 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, persistent or recurrent high-risk NMIBC or progressive disease, or up to 24 months of therapy without disease progression. The median age was 73 years and the median number of prior BCG instillations was 12. More than half of patients (56.9%) had a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) of less than 10, and most patients in this analysis had refused prior cystectomy. The Primary end point was Complete Response Rate (CRR) as defined by negative results for cystoscopy with TURBT/biopsies as applicable, urine cytology, and CT Urography imaging. Secondary end points included Duration of Response and Safety.

At a median follow up was 28 months the Complete Response Rate was 41% and the median Duration of Response was 16.2 months. Forty-six percent (46%) of responding patients experienced a Complete Response lasting at least 12 months. The most frequent adverse reactions were fatigue, diarrhea, rash, pruritis, musculoskeletal pain, peripheral edema and hypothyroidism.

It was concluded from this study that KEYTRUDA® had encouraging activity in bladder cancer patients, with high-risk, BCG-unresponsive Carcinoma in Situ, with or without papillary tumors. The authors added that this study demonstrates that immune activation with systemically administered treatment can result in local activity in the bladder, as well as long-term durable remissions of cancer.
Keynote 057: Phase II trial of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for patients (pts) with high-risk (HR) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) unresponsive to bacillus calmette-guérin (BCG). Balar AV, Kulkarni GS, Uchio EM, et al. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 350)

FDA Approves IMFINZI® for Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on March 27, 2020 approved IMFINZI® (Durvalumab) in combination with Etoposide and either Carboplatin or Cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020 about 228,820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and about 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13-15% of all lung cancers and is aggressive. Patients with extensive stage SCLC are often treated with a combination of Carboplatin or Cisplatin with Etoposide as first line treatment and the tumor response rates are as high as 60-80%. However, majority of the patients relapse within months of completing initial therapy, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of approximately 10 months. Patients often receive HYCAMTIN® (Topotecan) for recurrent or progressive SCLC (second-line treatment) and after failure on second-line therapy, treatment options are limited. The 5 year survival rate for Extensive Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is less than 5%, with a median survival of 9-10 months from the time of diagnosis.Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-PD-1-and-PD-L1-Antibodies

Based on the premise that SCLC has a high mutation rate, it was hypothesized that these tumors may be immunogenic and more recently immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated clinical activity in Extensive Stage SCLC. IMFINZI® (Durvalumab) is a selective, high-affinity, human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, that blocks the binding of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) to Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) receptor and CD80, thereby unleashing the T cells to recognize and kill tumor cells.

IMFINZI® is approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, who have not progressed following chemoradiotherapy. Additionally, IMFINZI® is also approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following Platinum-containing chemotherapy, or who have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with Platinum-containing chemotherapy.

This present FDA approval was based on CASPIAN trial, which is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase III study, in which the efficacy of IMFINZI® with or without CTLA-4 inhibitor Tremelimumab, in combination with Etoposide plus either Cisplatin or Carboplatin (Platinum-Etoposide), was compared to chemotherapy alone, in treatment-naive patients with ES-SCLC. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to IMFINZI® plus Platinum-Etoposide, IMFINZI® plus Tremelimumab plus Platinum-Etoposide, or Platinum-Etoposide alone. This study allocated 268 patients to the IMFINZI® plus Platinum-Etoposide group and 269 patients to the Platinum-Etoposide group. Treatment with Platinum-Etoposide consisted of Etoposide 80-100 mg/m2 IV on days 1-3 of each cycle with investigator’s choice of either Carboplatin AUC 5-6 mg/mL per min or Cisplatin 75-80 mg/m2 IV administered on day 1 of each cycle. Patients received up to four cycles of Platinum-Etoposide along with IMFINZI® 1500 mg IV with or without Tremelimumab 75 mg IV every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance IMFINZI® 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks in the immunotherapy treatment groups, or up to six cycles of Platinum-Etoposide IV every 3 weeks plus Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (at the treating physicians discretion), in the Platinum-Etoposide control group. The median patient age was 62 years and 10% of the patients had CNS metastases. PCI was administered to 8% of patients in the Platinum-Etoposide group. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Additional efficacy outcome measures included Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR). The authors reported the results for the IMFINZI® plus Platinum-Etoposide group, compared to the Platinum-Etoposide group, from a planned interim analysis.

The median OS was 13.0 months in the IMFINZI® plus chemotherapy group, compared with 10.3 months in the chemotherapy alone group (HR=0.73; P=0.0047), with a 27% reduction in the risk of death. Approximately 34% of patients who received IMFINZI® were alive at 18 months as compared to 25% in the control arm of the trial. Additionally, IMFINZI® plus chemotherapy demonstrated a higher PFS rate at 12 months (17.5% versus 4.7%), a 10.3% increase in confirmed ORR (67.9% versus 57.6%), and improved Duration of Response at 12 months (22.7% versus 6.3%). The most common adverse reactions noted were nausea, fatigue, asthenia, and alopecia.

It was concluded that the addition of IMFINZI® to first line Platinum-Etoposide chemotherapy combination significantly improved Overall Survival in patients with Extensive Stage-Small Cell Lung Cancer, when compared to chemotherapy alone.
Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Paz-Ares L, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, CASPIAN investigators, et al. Lancet. 2019;394:1929-1939

Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is an Important Prognostic Biomarker for Patients with Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 228, 820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.
Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 (Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1) inhibitors, also called Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), has changed the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced NSCLC. In previously treated patients with NSCLC, the Overall Response Rates (ORR) with single agent Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) range from 14-20%, with median Overall Survival (OS) of 10 to 12 months. In those with PD-L1 expression of 50% or more by ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) analysis, the ORR can reach up to 30% with a median OS of 20 months. However, in patients with negative or weak PD-L1 expression (1%-49% positive tumor cells), who account for approximately two thirds of the NSCLC population, the response rates range from 8-19% with a median OS slightly below 10 months. Even among those with tumors expressing PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, not all patients benefit from Immunotherapy with ICIs. Therefore identifying biomarkers for patients likely to respond to ICI therapy, and predicting resistance is important and relevant in selecting the appropriate patients for treatment with ICIs.
There is growing evidence on the role of inflammation in cancer biology and systemic inflammatory response may have prognostic significance in different cancer types. Inflammatory process in various cancers imparts immunoresistance to ICIs, by activating oncogenic signaling pathways, there by promoting cancer growth and dissemination, with resulting poor outcomes. Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and serum Lactate DeHydrogenase (LDH) level have been investigated as potential inflammatory biomarkers in patients with cancer. The dNLR is calculated using a formula dNLR= Absolute Neutrophil Count/(White Blood Count minus Absolute Neutrophil Count). These ratios are simple and easy to calculate from routine blood tests. Both these biomarkers have been correlated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor outcomes, in patients with melanoma. In two large studies involving patients with advanced melanoma treated with Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab, dNLR of 3 or more and LDH of at least 2.5 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), reflected a pro-inflammatory status and resulted in poor outcomes.

Based on this important finding in malignant melanoma, Mezquita L and colleagues (JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:351-357) conducted a multicenter, retrospective study involving 466 patients treated with ICIs, to determine whether combining the two factors – pretreatment dNLR and LDH (Lung Immune Prognostic Index-LIPI), was associated with resistance to ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. In this study, LIPI was developed on the basis of dNLR (derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio) of greater than 3 and LDH greater than Upper Limit of Normal (ULN). LIPI was used to stratify patients with NSCLC into 3 groups (Good= 0 factors; Intermediate= 1 of 2 factors, Poor= 2 factors). The authors based on this study concluded that pretreatment LIPI, combining derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) greater than 3 and serum LDH level greater than Upper Limit of Normal, correlated with worse outcomes for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs).
To determine whether LIPI score provides prognostic information for patients with metastatic NSCLC, the authors in this publication performed an exploratory retrospective analysis of the LIPI on pooled clinical trial data from 11 randomized multinational studies (5 ICI trials and 6 targeted therapy trials), and in the final analysis included 3987 patients treated with ICIs, targeted therapy, or cytotoxic chemotherapy, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. In the 5 ICI trials (N = 2440), 1368 patients received ICIs and 1072 received cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the 6 targeted therapy trials (N = 1547), 53% of EGFR mutant and 47.1% of ALK positive patients received targeted therapy 32.0% of EGFR mutant and 68% of ALK positive patients received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were relatively balanced between groups. Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) scores were calculated based on the dNLR and the LDH level, as mentioned elsewhere in this document.
For patients receiving ICIs, a good LIPI score was associated with longer Overall Survival (OS) compared with a poor LIPI score, with an estimated median survival of 15.6 versus 4.5 months (HR=0.34). A similar prognostic association was observed for patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy, with patients having a good LIPI score having a longer survival than patients with a poor score, with an estimated median survival of 10.4 versus 5.3 months (HR=0.49). Similar associations were also noted between good LIPI scores and longer Progression Free Survival (PFS). As expected, PD-L1 expression of 1% or more, as well as higher albumin levels was independently associated with improved outcomes.
Among patients with tumors harboring either ALK alterations or EGFR-activating mutations who received targeted therapy, those with a good LIPI score had an estimated median survival of 46.5 months compared with 16.6 months for those with a poor score (HR=0.28). A similar prognostic association was observed in this patient group receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, with patients having a good LIPI score experiencing a longer survival than patients with a poor score (estimated median survival of 33.4 months versus 17.1 months (HR=0.41). Further, similar associations between LIPI score and PFS were observed. For patients enrolled in these studies, regardless of receiving targeted therapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy, multivariable analysis consistently showed that LIPI score was independently associated with OS and PFS.
It was concluded from this analysis that pretreatment LIPI risk score may be an important prognostic biomarker, irrespective of pharmacologic class of treatment, for patients with metastatic NSCLC. Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for Patients Treated for Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Kazandjian D, Gong Y, Keegan P, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1481-1485.

FDA Approves Frontline TECENTRIQ® with Carboplatin and nab-Paclitaxel for Metastatic Non-Squamous NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on December 3, 2019 approved TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) in combination with nab-Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2019, about 228,150 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 142,670 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the T cells of the immune system. Immuno-Oncology (IO) therapies unleash the T cells by blocking the Immune checkpoint proteins, thereby resulting in T cell proliferation, activation and a therapeutic response. Immunotherapy with PD-1 (Programmed cell Death 1) and PD-L1 (Programmed cell Death Ligand 1) inhibitors have demonstrated a clear survival benefit both as a single agent or in combination, compared with standard chemotherapy, in both treatment-naive and previously treated patients for advanced NSCLC. It is now standard therapy for patients with lung cancer. TECENTRIQ® is an anti PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, designed to directly bind to PD-L1, expressed on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thereby blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors and thus enabling the activation of T cells. Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-Anti-PD-1-and-Anti-PD-L1-Antibodies

IMpower 130 is an international, multicentre, open-label, randomized, Phase III study, evaluating the efficacy and safety of TECENTRIQ® in combination with Carboplatin and nab-Paclitaxel versus chemotherapy (Carboplatin and nab-Paclitaxel) alone, for chemotherapy-naïve patients with Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. This study enrolled 724 patients who were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive TECENTRIQ® 1200 mg IV on Day 1, along with Carboplatin AUC 6 on Day 1 and nab-Paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 IV, on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day cycle, for 4 or 6 cycles followed by maintenance TECENTRIQ®, or Carboplatin and nab-Paclitaxel alone (control group), followed by Best Supportive Care during the maintenance treatment phase or Switch maintenance to Pemetrexed every 3 weeks. Stratification factors included gender, baseline liver metastases, and PD-L1 expression. The co-Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival in the intention-to-treat EGFR and ALK wild-type population. The median follow up in the population studied was 19 months.

There was a significant improvement in median Overall Survival in the TECENTRIQ® plus chemotherapy group at 18.6 months compared to 13.9 months in the chemotherapy alone group (HR=0.79; P=0.033), as well as improvement in the median Progression Free Survival (7 months versus 5.5 months, respectively, HR=0.64; P<0.0001). The most common adverse reactions reported in 20% or more of patients in the TECENTRIQ® and chemotherapy group were fatigue/asthenia, nausea, alopecia, constipation, diarrhea, and decreased appetite.

It was concluded that first-line TECENTRIQ® in combination with chemotherapy significantly improved Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival, compared to chemotherapy alone, in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC without ALK or EGFR mutations. This IO-chemotherapy combination is the second FDA approval for this patient population. Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. West H, McCleod M, Hussein M, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:924-937

First Line Combination of TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® Improves Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2019, about 42,030 new cases of primary liver cancer will be diagnosed in the US and 31,780 patients will die of their disease. Liver cancer is seen more often in men than in women and the incidence has more than tripled since 1980. This increase has been attributed to the higher rate of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection among baby boomers (born between 1945 through 1965). Obesity and Type II diabetes have also likely contributed to the trend. Other risk factors include alcohol, which increases liver cancer risk by about 10% per drink per day, and tobacco use, which increases liver cancer risk by approximately 50%. HepatoCellular Carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and majority of patients typically presents at an advanced stage. The prognosis for unresectable HCC remains poor and one year survival rate is less than 50% following diagnosis. NEXAVAR® was approved by the FDA in 2007 for the first line treatment of unresectable HepatoCellular Carcinoma (HCC) and the median Overall Survival was 10.7 months in the NEXAVAR® group and 7.9 months in the placebo group.

TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) is an anti PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, designed to directly bind to PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thereby blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors, and thus enabling the activation of T cells. AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) and prevents the interaction of VEGF to its receptors (Flt-1 and KDR) on the surface of endothelial cells, thereby preventing endothelial cell proliferation and new blood vessel formation. The use of TECENTRIQ® in combination with AVASTIN® has a strong scientific rationale, as this combination can potentially enhance the immune system to combat a broad range of malignancies. AVASTIN® in addition to its established anti-angiogenic properties can further enhance TECENTRIQ®’s ability to restore anti-cancer immunity, by inhibiting VEGF-related immunosuppression, promoting T-cell tumor infiltration and enabling priming and activation of T-cell responses against tumor antigens.

IMbrave150 is a global, open-label, multicenter, randomized, Phase III study in which a combination of TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® was compared with standard-of-care NEXAVAR®, in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic HCC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive TECENTRIQ® 1200 mg IV on day 1 along with AVASTIN® 15 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (N=336) or NEXAVAR® 400 mg orally twice daily, each day of the 21-day cycle (N=165). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The treatment groups were well balanced and enrolled patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh Class A disease, and adequate hematologic and end-organ function. The two co-Primary endpoints were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS). The key Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR), Time To Progression (TTP) and Duration of Response (DOR), as well as Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), Safety and Pharmacokinetics.

With a median follow up of 8.6 months, the OS was not yet reached in the TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® combination group compared with 13.2 months in the NEXAVAR® group (HR=0.58; P=0.0006). The median PFS was 6.8 months versus 4.3 months respectively (HR=0.59; P<0.0001). The ORR was 27% versus 12% (P<0.0001) based on the Independent Review Facility RECIST 1.1 criteria, in favor of the combination regimen. This benefit was seen across clinical subgroups and the combination regimen delayed deterioration of Quality of Life compared with NEXAVAR®. Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events were similar and occurred in 57% and 55% of the combination and control arms, respectively.

It was concluded that a combination of TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival compared with NEXAVAR®, in treatment naïve patients with unresectable Hepatocelluar Carcinoma. The authors added that this is the first study in 11 years to show an improvement in Overall Survival with a new first line treatment option, compared to NEXAVAR®, and has the potential to be a practice changing treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. IMbrave150: Efficacy and safety results from a ph III study evaluating atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) vs sorafenib (Sor) as first treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cheng A-L, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Annals of Oncology, Volume 30, 2019 Supplement 9. LBA3

Late breaking Abstract – ESMO 2019 Chemotherapy-Free First Line Immunotherapy Combination Improves Overall Survival in Advanced NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2019, about 228,150 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 142,670 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the T cells of the immune system.

Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors include CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152) and PD-1(Programmed cell Death 1). Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the T cells. OPDIVO® is presently approved for treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC and progression on or after Platinum-based chemotherapy. YERVOY® is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks Immune checkpoint protein/receptor CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4).

CheckMate-227 is an open-label, multi-part, global, Phase III trial in which OPDIVO® based regimens were compared with Platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with first line advanced NSCLC, across non-squamous and squamous tumor histologies. In Part 1 of this trial, there were 2 cohorts- Part 1a in which OPDIVO® plus low dose YERVOY® (N=396) or OPDIVO® monotherapy (N=396) was compared with chemotherapy alone (N=397), in patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 expression of 1% or more and Part 1b in which OPDIVO® plus low dose YERVOY® (N=187) or OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy (N=177) was compared with chemotherapy alone (N=186), in patients whose tumors did not express PD-L1 (less than 1%). (In Part 2 of this trial, OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 expression. Part 2 did not meet its Primary endpoint for Overall Survival for OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, and is published elsewhere). It should be noted that when this trial was launched, chemotherapy along with immunotherapy or immunotherapy alone was not approved for the front-line treatment of NSCLC. Therefore, dual immunotherapy combination was not compared with current standards of care such as chemotherapy plus immunotherapy.Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-Combination-Immunotherapy

OPDIVO® was administered at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and in the combination arm, YERVOY® was administered at 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. When administered with chemotherapy, OPDIVO® was administered at 360 mg every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by histology, and treatment was administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for 2 years, for immunotherapy. There were two Co-primary endpoints in Part 1 for OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® versus chemotherapy: Overall survival (OS) in patients whose tumors express PD-L1 (assessed in patients enrolled in Part 1a) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) in patients with TMB of 10 mut/Mb or more, across the PD-L1 spectrum (assessed in patients enrolled across Parts 1a and 1b). The minimum follow up for the Primary endpoint was 29 months.

Both Part 1a and Part 1b groups met their Primary endpoints. In the Part 1a cohort with PD-L1 expression of 1% or more, the Overall Survival was significantly longer with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY®, compared to chemotherapy. The median Overall Survival was 17.1 months in the Immunotherapy combination group compared to 14.9 months in the chemotherapy group (HR=0.79; P=0.007). Progression Free Survival, Objective Response Rates and Duration of Response were all greater with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination, compared to chemotherapy. In the Part 1b cohort with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%, Overall Survival benefit was again observed with the OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination, compared with chemotherapy. Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related Adverse Events across all patients was 33% in those treated with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination, 19% with single agent OPDIVO® and 36% with chemotherapy.

It was concluded that first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with a combination of two immunotherapy drugs improves Overall Survival, compared to chemotherapy, and offers a chemotherapy-free first line treatment option for a subset of NSCLC patients, leaving chemotherapy for later lines of therapy. Nivolumab + low-dose ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer: CheckMate-227 part 1 final analysis. Peters S, Ramalingam SS, Paz-Ares L, et al. Presented at 2019 ESMO Congress; September 27 to October 1, 2019; Barcelona, Spain. Abstract LBA4.

Updated Analysis KEYTRUDA® Doubles Overall Survival Compared with Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2019, about 228,150 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 142,670 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. It thereby reverses the PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells. High level of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is defined as membranous PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of the tumor cells, regardless of the staining intensity. It is estimated that based on observations from previous studies, approximately 25% of the patients with advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) have a high level of PD-L1 expression and high level of PD-L1 expression has been associated with significantly increased response rates to KEYTRUDA®.

KEYNOTE-024 is an open-label, randomized phase III trial in which KEYTRUDA® administered at a fixed dose was compared with investigator’s choice of cytotoxic chemotherapy, as first line therapy, for patients with advanced NSCLC, with tumor PD-L1 expression of 50% or greater. Three hundred and five (N=305) treatment naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of tumor cells, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either KEYTRUDA® (N=154) or chemotherapy (N=151). Enrolled patients had no sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK translocations. Treatment consisted of KEYTRUDA® administered at a fixed dose of 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or the investigator’s choice of platinum-based chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles. Pemetrexed (ALIMTA®) based therapy was permitted only for patients who had non-squamous tumors and these patients could receive ALIMTA® maintenance therapy after the completion of combination chemotherapy. Patients in the chemotherapy group who experienced disease progression were allowed to cross over to the KEYTRUDA® group. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Safety.

It was previously reported that at a median follow up of 11.2 months, the median PFS was 10.3 months in the KEYTRUDA® group versus 6 months in the chemotherapy group (HR=0.50; P<0.001). However, median OS had not been reached in the KEYTRUDA® group at the time of that analysis. The Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (IDMC) based on these results recommended stopping the trial early, to allow for use of KEYTRUDA® in patients randomly assigned to chemotherapy. Eighty two patients (N=82) assigned to chemotherapy, met criteria to cross over to the KEYTRUDA® group, upon progression.

This publication is an updated analysis of the KEYNOTE-024 study, after a median follow-up of 25.2 months. The median OS was 30 months in the KEYTRUDA® group and 14.2 months in the chemotherapy group (HR=0.63; P=0.002). When adjusted for crossover, the OS benefit was maintained and the Hazard Ratio for OS among KEYTRUDA® group versus chemotherapy group was 0.49. Further, more patients in the KEYTRUDA® group achieved 12-month OS (70.3% versus 54.8%), and an ORR response (45.5% versus 29.8%), compared to the chemotherapy group respectively. The ORR among those who crossed over to KEYTRUDA®, was 20.7%. The median Duration of Response has not yet been reached for patients assigned to KEYTRUDA® and also for those who crossed over to KEYTRUDA®. For those assigned chemotherapy, the median Duration of Response was 7.1 months. Patients in the KEYTRUDA® group had lower rates of Grade 3-5 adverse events, compared to those in the chemotherapy group (31.2% versus 53.3%), as well as a lower rate of any-grade adverse events (76.6% versus 90%).

It was concluded that in this updated analysis of KEYNOTE-024, KEYTRUDA® continued to provide improved Overall Survival benefit, inspite of the high rate of crossover, with lower rates of Adverse Events, when compared to chemotherapy, among patients with metastatic NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression. The authors added that these updated long term results support KEYTRUDA® monotherapy as a standard-of-care regimen for first line treatment of advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression of 50% or greater and without EGFR/ALK alterations. Updated Analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score of 50% or Greater. Reck M , Rodríguez–Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:537-546

Antibiotic Treatment Prior to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy has a Detrimental Effect on Response Rates and Overall Survival

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2019, there will be an estimated 1,762,450 new cancer cases diagnosed and 606,880 cancer deaths in the United States. Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system.

Preclinical studies have suggested that immune-based therapies for cancer may have a very complex interplay with the host’s microbiome and there may be a relationship between gut bacteria and immune response to cancer. The crosstalk between microbiota in the gut and the immune system allows for the tolerance of commensal bacteria (normal microflora) and oral food antigens and at the same time enables the immune system to recognize and attack opportunistic bacteria. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors strongly rely on the influence of the host’s microbiome, and the gut microbial diversity enhances mucosal immunity, dendritic cell function, and antigen presentation. Broad-spectrum antibiotics can alter the bacterial composition and bacterial diversity of our gut, by killing the good bacteria. It has been postulated that this may negate the benefits of immunotherapy and influence treatment outcomes.Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-Combination-Immunotherapy

The authors conducted this study to determine whether there was an association between antibiotic therapy administered prior to or concurrently with ICI therapy and Overall Survival (OS) and Response Rates, in patients with cancer, treated with ICIs in routine clinical practice. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, 196 patients with cancer who received ICI therapy were recruited at two tertiary care centers between January 2015 and April 2018. Majority of enrolled patients had Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (N=119), but patients with Melanoma (N=38) as well as Urologic and Head and Neck cancers (N=39) were also included in the analysis. The median age was 68 years, and majority of patients had metastatic disease at the time of treatment initiation with ICIs and 96% of patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy alone. Broad spectrum antibiotics up to 30 days prior to commencement of ICI qualified as prior antibiotic exposure whereas concurrent treatment with antibiotics was defined as antibiotic treatment from the first day of ICI treatment until cessation. Beta-lactams were the most commonly prescribed antibiotic class, and were given as a single course for less than 7 days. When antibiotics were administered concurrently with ICIs, patients tended to be treated longer and with multiple courses. The common indication for both prior and concurrent antibiotic treatment was respiratory infections, and 15% of patients received antibiotic therapy prior to ICI therapy, whereas 35% of patients received antibiotics concurrently with ICIs. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), calculated from the time of ICI therapy commencement and radiologic response to treatment, with disease refractory to ICI therapy defined as progressive disease 6-8 weeks after the first ICI dose, without evidence of pseudoprogression.

In this analysis, antibiotic treatment prior to ICI therapy had a significant adverse effect on Overall Survival, with a median survival of only 2 months for those who received prior antibiotic treatment versus 26 months for antibiotic-naive patients (HR=7.4; P<0.001). Further, patients who had received prior antibiotic treatment had a higher likelihood of primary refractoriness to ICIs, compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (81% versus 44% (P<0.001). The poor OS outcomes when patients received antibiotic treatment prior to ICI therapy were noted, irrespective of tumor site (OS in NSCLC 26 vs 2.5 months, P<0.001, OS in Melanoma 14 vs 3.9 months, P<0.001, OS in other tumors 11 vs 1.1 months, P <0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed that prior antibiotic therapy and response to ICI therapy were associated with OS, independent of tumor site, disease burden, and performance status. Antibiotic treatment administered concurrently with ICIs however, was not associated with worse Overall Survival.

It was concluded that treatment with antibiotics prior to therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in routine clinical practice, is associated with a worse treatment response and Overall Survival in unselected group of patients. This study suggests that timing of antibiotic exposure may be crucial and the authors recommend that studies are urgently required to investigate antibiotic-mediated alterations of gut microbiota as a determinant of poorer outcomes, following treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Association of Prior Antibiotic Treatment With Survival and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Cancer. Pinato DJ, Howlett S, Ottaviani D, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019, Sep 12. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2785. [Epub ahead of print]