SUMMARY: Abiraterone acetate (ZYTIGA®) is a novel, targeted, oral androgen biosynthesis inhibitor that decreases androgen production in the adrenal glands, testes and prostate cancer cells by inhibiting a steroidal enzyme CYP17. This agent, was approved by the FDA in April, 2011 for use in combination with prednisone, for the treatment of patients with metastatic CRPC (Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer), who have received prior chemotherapy containing docetaxel (TAXOTERE®). Patients with high risk localized prostate cancer do poorly in spite of aggressive local therapies. To improve outcomes in this patient population, the authors conducted a neoadjuvant trial in which patients with localized prostate cancer with high risk features were divided into two groups. The first group (n = 28) was treated with the LHRH analog, LUPRON® (Leuprolide acetate) for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of combination treatment with LUPRON® and ZYTIGA® . The second group (n = 30) received neoadjuvant LUPRON® plus ZYTIGA® for the entire 24 week period. Patients had radical prostatectomies following their neoadjuvant therapy. Fifty eight patients were enrolled and the eligibility criteria included either T3 disease, a Gleason score of ≥7, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥20, or a PSA velocity >2 ng/mL/year. Post prostatectomy specimen analysis revealed that patients treated with the combination of LUPRON® plus ZYTIGA® for the entire 24 week period has a complete pathologic response (pCR) or near complete pCR (≤ 5mm residual tumor) rate amounting to 34%. This benefit was seen without significant systemic toxicities. The authors concluded that neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy may significantly improve outcomes in high risk patients with localized disease and will need to be studied further. Taplin ME, Montgomery RB, Logothetis C, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4521)
Category: Meeting Updates
Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) versus CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R) as first-line treatment in patients with indolent and mantle cell lymphomas (MCL) Updated results from the StiL NHL1 study
SUMMARY: This is an updated analysis of a study initially presented at ASH 2009 meeting. TREANDA® (Bendamustine) is an alkylating agent presently indicated for the treatment of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) as well as Indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during 
or within six months of treatment with RITUXAN® (Rituximab) or a RITUXAN® containing regimen. In this randomized phase III trial, TREANDA® plus RITUXAN® (B-R)was compared to R-CHOP as first line treatment for patients with indolent or MCL. The primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). With a median follow up of 45 months, patients on B-R had a PFS of 69.5 months vs 31.2 months for R-CHOP (HR =0.58; P<0.001). This benefit was seen in all age groups and all histological subtypes except marginal zone lymphoma. B-R was better tolerated than R-CHOP. There was no difference in the overall survival between the two groups. It should be noted however that close to 50% of the patients on R-CHOP whose disease progressed, were permitted to cross over to B-R and this could have impacted the overall survival results. Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3)
LUX-Lung 3 A randomized, open-label, phase III study of afatinib versus pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung harboring EGFR-activating mutations
SUMMARY: Afatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that irreversibly inhibits EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2), and ErbB4. In this study, chemo naïve patients with advanced stage adenocarcinoma of the lung (stage IIIB/IV) with EGFR mutations, were randomly assigned to receive either Afatinib or a combination of Pemetrexed and Cisplatin. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment with Afatinib resulted in a significantly prolonged PFS compared to combination chemotherapy (median 11.1 vs 6.9 months; HR 0.58; P=0.0004). Further, patients in the Afatinib group had a higher objective response rate ((56% vs 23%; p<0.0001), as well as significant delay in symptom progression, compared to the combination chemotherapy group. Yang JC-H, Schuler MH, Yamamoto N, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(suppl; abstr LBA7500).
Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in Cancer
SUMMARY:Durable tumor responses have been demonstrated in previous clinical studies using high dose interleukin 2 and anti-CTLA 4 antibody YERVOY® (Ipilimumab), for advanced malignancies such as metastatic melanoma. The programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor is an inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T-cells in the tumor micro environment. It has two known ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2 which can turn off the immune system when they combine with the PD-1 receptor. BMS-936558 is an anti-PD-1 targeted, fully human, monoclonal antibody which acts similar to the anti CTLA 4 antibody YERVOY®, thereby unleashing the T cell response against cancer cells. Results from a Phase 1 study in which 296 patients were enrolled demonstrated a durable response rate of 18% among patients with advanced non- small cell lung cancer, 28% among patients with advanced melanoma and 27% among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. PD-L1 was identified as a potential biomarker for response, with no responses seen in PD-L1 negative tumors. Topalian SL, Hodi S, Brahmer JR, et al. NEJM June 2, 2012.
Primary results from EMILIA, a phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus capecitabine (X) and lapatinib (L) in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab (T) and a taxane
SUMMARY:The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER 1,HER 2,HER 3 and HER 4. Overexpression of HER 2 in breast cancer has been associated with higher risk for relapse as well as overall survival. Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER 2. It binds to the extracellular domain of the receptor and blocks the downstream cell signaling pathways. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of the antibody trastuzumab and the chemotherapy agent DM1 linked together and inhibits HER2 signaling and destroys the HER2-positive tumor cells by delivering the chemotherapy agent DM1 directly inside the tumor cells. The EMILIA trial is a phase III study in which 978 patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had previously received treatment with HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) and a taxane chemotherapy, were enrolled. Patient received either trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) or XELODA® (Capecitabine) and TYKERB® (Lapatinib) doublet. The primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and safety. Patients receiving T-DM1 had an improved PFS compared to XELODA® and TYKERB® (9.6 months vs 6.4 months, HR=0.65, P <0.0001). A final OS analysis will be available at a later date. Blackwell KL, Miles D, Gianni L, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr LBA1)
Effect of MDV3100, an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI), on overall survival in patients with prostate cancer post docetaxel Results from the phase III AFFIRM study
SUMMARY: MDV3100 is an androgen receptor antagonist with a significantly higher binding affinity for the androgen receptor (AR) compared to the antiandrogen bicalutamide and there by competitively inhibits the binding of androgens to the androgen receptor. Majority of the patients with advanced prostate cancer become refractory to hormone therapy because of increased production of androgen receptors by the tumors as well as mutated androgen receptors. The superiority of this novel agent, MDV3100, is based on the fact that the expression of androgen dependent genes are downregulated with MDV 3100 leading to cell death or apoptosis, whereas with bicalutamide the expression of these genes are upregulated. Further MDV3100 continues to antagonize mutated androgen receptors on the prostate tumor cells in contrast to bicalutamide which behaves as an agonist. It is thus an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI). The AFFIRM clinical trial is a randomized, multinational phase III study in which patients who had received prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens were randomized 2:1 to receive either MDV3100, 160 mg/day or placebo. Patients treated with MDV3100 had a median survival of 18.4 months, compared with 13.6 months for men treated with placebo, with a median OS advantage of 4.8 months and a reduction in the risk of death by 37%. Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 5; abstr LBA1)
Results of a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (CORRECT) of regorafenib plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after standard therapies
SUMMARY: In this phase III trial, patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma who had progressed after approved standard therapies were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor plus best supportive care or placebo plus best supportive care. Seven hundred and sixty patients were randomized. Patients receiving Regorafenib had a statistically significant improvement in the overall survival and progression free survival compared to placebo, without any unexpected toxicities. This important study gives a new option for individuals with advanced colorectal cancer who have progressed on all available standard therapies. Grothey A, F. Sobrero AF, Siena S, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 4; abstr LBA385)
Bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) continued beyond first progression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with BEV plus CT Results of a randomized phase III intergroup study (TML study)
SUMMARY:The ML18147 (TML) is a randomized phase III trial in which patients who received AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab) plus standard chemotherapy as initial treatment (first-line treatment) for their metastatic colorectal cancer were then randomized to either continue AVASTIN® with a different chemotherapy after their cancer progressed (second-line treatment) or receive the different chemotherapy regimen without AVASTIN®. Patient group continuing AVASTIN® as a part of second line treatment demonstrated an improved survival compared to those who received chemotherapy alone, as second line treatment. This study has demonstrated that continuing AVASTIN® with second line chemotherapy post progression, extends survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Arnold D, Andre T, Bennouna J, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr CRA3503)