Category: Precision Oncology

FDA Grants Tumor-Agnostic Accelerated Approval to RETEVMO®

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on September 21, 2022, granted accelerated approval to Selpercatinib (RETEVMO®) for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a Rearranged during Transfection (RET) gene fusion that have progressed on or following prior systemic treatment, or who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. The FDA on the same day also granted Regular approval to Selpercatinib for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with a Rearranged during Transfection (RET) gene fusion, as detected by an FDA-approved test. FDA also approved the Oncomine Dx Target (ODxT) Test as a companion diagnostic for Selpercatinib.

In addition to the well characterized gene fusions involving ALK and ROS1 in NSCLC, genetic alterations involving other kinases including EGFR, BRAF, RET, NTRK, are all additional established targetable drivers. These genetic alterations are generally mutually exclusive, with no more than one predominant driver in any given cancer. The hallmark of all these genetic alterations is oncogene addiction, in which cancers are driven primarily, or even exclusively, by aberrant oncogene signaling, and are highly susceptible to small molecule inhibitors.

RET kinase is a transmembrane Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and plays an important role during the development and maintenance of a variety of tissues, including neural and genitourinary tissues. RET signaling activates downstream pathways such as JAK/STAT3 and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and leads to cellular proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis. Oncogenic alterations to the RET proto-oncogene result in uncontrolled cell growth and enhanced tumor invasiveness. RET alterations include RET rearrangements, leading to RET fusions, and activating point mutations occurring across multiple tumor types. RET fusions have been identified in approximately 2% of NSCLCs, 10-20% of non-medullary thyroid cancers. Activating RET point mutations account for approximately 60% of sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancers (MTC) and more than 90% of inherited MTCs. Other cancers with documented RET alterations include colorectal, pancreas, breast, and several hematologic malignancies.

Selpercatinib is a highly selective and potent, oral anti-RET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) designed to inhibit native RET signaling, as well as anticipated acquired resistance mechanisms. Selpercatinib selectively targets wild-type RET as well as various RET mutants and RET-containing fusion products. Additionally, Selpercatinib inhibits Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 (VEGFR1), VEGFR3, Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1), FGFR2, and FGFR3. This results in inhibition of cell growth of tumors that exhibit increased RET activity.

The LIBRETTO-001 is the largest open-label, multicenter, Phase I/II trial in patients with advanced solid tumors, including RET fusion-positive solid tumors, RET-mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancers, and other tumors with RET activation, treated with a RET inhibitor. To investigate the efficacy of Selpercatinib, the trial was conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1 (dose escalation) and Phase II (dose expansion). Patients with advanced cancer were eligible, if they have progressed on or were intolerant to available standard therapies, or no standard or available curative therapy existed, or in the opinion of the Investigator, they would be unlikely to tolerate or derive significant clinical benefit from appropriate standard of care therapy, or they declined standard therapy. A dose of 160 mg BID was the recommended Phase II dose. Up to about 850 patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a RET gene alteration in tumor and/or blood were enrolled in 6 different Phase II cohorts, based on tumor type, RET alteration and prior therapy. Identification of RET gene alterations were prospectively determined in local laboratories using either Next Generation Sequencing, Polymerase Chain Reaction, or Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. The Phase II portion of the trial had a Primary endpoint of Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) and Secondary endpoints of Duration of Response, CNS Objective Response Rate, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and safety.

RET Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors
This group included 41 patients and the most common cancers were pancreatic adenocarcinoma (27%), colorectal (24%), salivary (10%), and unknown primary (7%). Majority of the patients (90%) received 2 prior systemic therapies and 32% had received 3 or more. The median age of patients was 50 years, 54% were female, 68% were White, 24% were Asian, and 95% had metastatic disease. RET fusion-positive status was detected in 98% of patients using NGS and 2% using FISH.

The Objective Response Rate was 44%, with 5% Complete Response and 39% Partial Response. The median Duration of response was 24.5 months and 67% of patients had a Duration of Response of 6 months or more.

The NSCLC Cohort
Selpercatinib was previously granted accelerated approval in May 2020 for patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC based on initial Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) among 144 patients enrolled in the LIBRETTO-001 trial. The conversion to regular and traditional FDA approval was based on data from an additional 172 patients and 18 months of additional follow up, to assess durability of response. Patients received Selpercatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and efficacy was evaluated in a total of 316 patients with locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC. The median age of patients was 61 years, 58% were female, 49% were White, 41% were Asian and 97% had metastatic disease. Previously treated patients received a median of two prior systemic therapies and 58% had received prior anti PD 1/PD-L1 therapy.

Among the 69 treatment-naïve patients, the ORR was 84%, with 6% Complete Response and 78% Partial Response. The median Duration of Response was 20.2 months and 50% of patients had a Duration of Response of 12 months or more. Among the 247 previously treated patients, the ORR was 61%, with 7% Complete Response and 54% Partial Response. The median Duration of Response was 28.6 months and 63% of patients had a Duration of Response of 12 months or more.

It is estimated that up to 50% of RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients can have brain metastases, and in the subset of patients with brain metastases (N=21), treatment with Selpercatinib demonstrated a CNS Objective Response Rate of 85%, and 38% of responders had an intracranial Duration of Response of 12 months or greater. The most common toxicities in patients were edema, diarrhea, fatigue, dry mouth, hypertension, abdominal pain, constipation, rash, nausea, and headache.

LIBRETTO-001 is the largest trial ever reported in RET-altered cancer patients and represents an important milestone in the Precision Medicine arena. Selpercatinib is the first and only RET inhibitor to receive both tumor-agnostic accelerated approval and traditional approval in NSCLC, reinforcing its benefits across diverse tumor types.

Selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion–positive non–small-cell lung cancer: updated safety and efficacy from the registrational libretto-001 phase I/II trial.Published September 19, 2022. Drilon A, Subbiah V, Gautschi O, et al. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00393

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-selpercatinib-locally-advanced-or-metastatic-ret-fusion-positive-solid-tumors

FDA Grants Regular Approval to TABRECTA® for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on August 10, 2022, granted regular approval to TABRECTA® (Capmatinib), for adult patients with metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have a mutation leading to Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET) exon 14 skipping, as detected by an FDA-approved test. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

MET is a widely expressed Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and plays a pivotal role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The MET gene encodes for a protein known as the Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) Receptor. Upon binding by Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), the HGF Receptor is activated, with resulting activation of the downstream RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways, thereby serving different important biological functions. Alterations in the MET gene leading to abnormal MET signaling, has been identified in different types of cancers including thyroid, lung, breast, liver, colon, kidney, ovary, and gastric carcinoma.

Two key MET alterations include MET exon 14 skipping mutations and MET amplification. MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in approximately 5% of NSCLC patients with enrichment in sarcomatoid lung cancers (22%). MET exon 14 skipping mutation is a recognized oncogenic driver and is a molecular genetic abnormality indicating the presence of a splice site mutation that results in a loss of transcription of exon 14 of the MET gene. Most exon 14 mutations occur in never-smokers and is seen in both squamous and adenocarcinoma histology. Patients whose cancers have MET exon 14 skipping generally have very high response rates to MET inhibitors and molecular testing for MET exon 14 skipping should therefore be performed on all lung cancers, because this is a targetable alteration. MET amplification has been more commonly seen in smokers, and responses in patients with MET-amplified tumors might be more variable and dependent on level of amplification, with higher responses noted in tumors with more than 5-6- fold amplification. Tumors with MET exon 14 skipping mutations usually do not harbor activating mutations in EGFR, KRAS, or BRAF or concurrent ALK, ROS1 or RET translocations. However, it appears that cMET exon 14 skipping is not mutually exclusive with cMET amplification.

TABRECTA® is a highly potent and selective, reversible inhibitor of MET tyrosine kinase. The FDA in May 2020 granted accelerated approval for the same indication based on the primary findings from the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial, which is a non-randomized, open-label, multi-cohort, Phase II study, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent TABRECTA® in adult patients with EGFR wild-type, ALK-negative, metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors have a mutation that leads to MET exon 14 skipping (METex14), as detected by an RNA-based RT-PCR. The conversion to regular approval was based on data from an additional 63 patients (Total N=160), as well as an additional 22 months of follow- up time, to assess durability of response and verify clinical benefit.

In this updated analysis, a total of 160 patients (N=160) with metastatic NSCLC and confirmed MET exon 14 skipping mutations were included, of whom 60 patients were treatment naïve and 100 patients were previously treated. The patients received TABRECTA® at 400 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median patient age was 71 years and all NSCLC histologies including sarcomatoid/carcinosarcoma were included. Majority of the patients (77%) were white and 23% were Asian, 61% never smoked, 83% had adenocarcinoma, and 16% had CNS metastases. Among previously treated patients, 81% received one, 16% received two, and 3% received three prior lines of systemic therapy. Amongst previously treated patients, 86% received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The Primary efficacy outcome was Overall Response Rate (ORR), and additional efficacy outcomes included Duration of Response, Time to Response, Disease Control Rate, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Safety, as determined by a Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC).

Among the treatment-naïve patients (N=60), the ORR was 68% with a median Duration of Response of 12.6 months. Among the previously treated patients (N=100), the ORR was 44%, with a median Duration of Response of 9.7 months. The most common adverse events (occurring in at least 20% of patients) were peripheral edema, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, dyspnea, and decreased appetite. TABRECTA® can also cause Interstitial Lung Disease, hepatotoxicity and photosensitivity.

It was concluded that TABRECTA® is a new treatment option for patients with MET exon 14 skipping- mutated advanced NSCLC, regardless of the line of therapy, with deep and durable responses, and with manageable toxicity profile.

Capmatinib in MET exon 14-mutated, advanced NSCLC: Updated results from the GEOMETRY mono-1 study. Wolf J, Garon EB, Groen HJM, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9020 Journal of Clinical Oncology – published online before print May 28, 2021.

FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to ENHERTU® for HER2-Mutant Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on August 11, 2022, granted accelerated approval to ENHERTU® (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki), for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have activating human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 or HER2 (ERBB2) mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test, and who have received a prior systemic therapy. This is the first drug approved for HER2-mutant NSCLC. FDA also approved Oncomine™ Dx Target Test (tissue) and Guardant360® CDx (plasma) as companion diagnostics for ENHERTU®. If no mutation is detected in a plasma specimen, the tumor tissue should be tested.

The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. HER2 is a Tyrosine Kinase Receptor expressed on the surface of several tumor types including Breast, Gastric, Lung and Colorectal cancers. It is a growth-promoting protein, and HER2 overexpression/HER2 gene amplification is often associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis in certain tumor types. However, HER2 overexpression and gene amplification are associated with distinct molecular entities and have limited therapeutic value in lung cancer.

HER2 mutations unlike HER2 overexpression and gene amplification are oncogenic drivers and are detected in 2 to 4% of NSCLCs. They are more often detected in younger, female and never-smokers, and almost exclusively in Adenocarcinomas. Next-generation sequencing is used to identify HER2 mutations. Majority of HER2 mutations (80-90%) occur in exon 20, as either a duplication or an insertion of 12 nucleotides, resulting in the addition of four amino acids (YVMA) at codon 775 in the kinase domain. This distinct molecular entity is characterized by specific pathological and clinical behavior. These acquired HER2 gene mutations have been independently associated with cancer cell growth, aggressive form of disease and poor prognosis, and with an increased incidence of brain metastases. There are currently no therapies approved specifically for the treatment HER2 mutant NSCLC and is therefore an unmet need.

ENHERTU® (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting HER2, with the amino acid sequence similar to HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab), attached to a potent cytotoxic Topoisomerase I inhibitor payload by a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker. ENHERTU® has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the tetrapeptide-based linker is stable in the plasma and is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are up-regulated in tumor cells. Unlike KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine), which is also an Antibody-Drug Conjugate, ENHERTU® has a higher drug-to-antibody ratio (8 versus 4), the released payload easily crosses the cell membrane with resulting potent cytotoxic effect on neighboring tumor cells regardless of target expression, and the released cytotoxic agent (payload) has a short half-life, minimizing systemic exposure. ENHERTU® is approved in the US for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive or HER2-Low breast cancer and locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive Gastric or GastroEsophageal Junction adenocarcinoma who have received a prior Trastuzumab based regimen. Translational research demonstrated that HER2-mutant NSCLC may preferentially internalize the HER2 receptor Antibody-Drug Conjugate complex regardless of HER2 protein expression and overcome resistance to other HER2-targeted agents.

In the DESTINY-Lung01 Phase II, open-label, two-cohort trial of heavily pretreated population of patients with HER2-mutated advanced NSCLC, treatment with ENHERTU® 6.4 mg/kg given by IV infusion every 3 weeks resulted in an Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 55%, with a median Duration of Response was 9.3 months. Responses were observed across different HER2 mutation subtypes. The median PFS was 8.2 months, and the median OS was 17.8 months (NEJM 2022;386:241-251).

The present FDA approval was based on DESTINY-Lung02, which is a global, multicenter, multi-cohort, randomized, blinded, dose-optimization, Phase II trial, in which the safety and efficacy of two doses ENHERTU® (5.4mg/kg or 6.4mg/kg) was evaluated, in patients with HER2 mutated metastatic NSCLC, with disease recurrence or progression during or after at least one regimen of prior anticancer therapy that must have contained a platinum-based chemotherapy. This study enrolled 152 patients (N=152) and patients were selected for treatment with ENHERTU® based on the presence of activating HER2 (ERBB2) mutations in a tumor specimen. Patients were randomized to receive ENHERTU® 6.4 mg/kg or 5.4 mg/kg by IV infusion every 3 weeks, until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The Primary endpoint of the trial was Objective Response Rate (ORR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included Disease Control Rate (DCR), Duration of Response (DoR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and Safety. The primary/interim efficacy analysis included a pre-specified cohort of 52 patients (N=52). The median age in this cohort was 58 years, 69% were female; 79% were Asian, 12% were White, and 10% were of other races.

ENHERTU® 5.4mg/kg IV demonstrated a confirmed Objective Response Rate of 57.7%, with a Complete Response Rate of 1.9%, Partial Response Rate of 55.8%, and median Duration of Response of 8.7 months. The most common adverse effects included nausea, alopecia, increased AST and ALT, cytopenias, and was consistent with previous clinical trials, with no new safety concerns identified.

It was concluded that ENHERTU® is the first HER2-directed treatment option for patients with HER2 mutated NSCLC, and fulfills an unmet medical need in this patient population.

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan-nxki-her2-mutant-non-small-cell-lung

PREMMplus Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Tool May Identify People Likely to Benefit from Multigene Panel Testing

RR

SUMMARY: Hereditary factors play an important role in the risk of developing several cancers. Therefore, identification of a germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment decision making, risk-reducing interventions, cancer screening for early diagnosis, and germline testing and targeted surveillance of unaffected relatives. Previously published studies have been biased by estimating the prevalence of germline cancer susceptibility in patients with breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer from registry populations, genetic testing companies, and high-risk cancer clinics.

With the widespread adoption of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), multiple genes can be tested simultaneously (MultiGene Panel Testing-MGPT), rather than sequential single-gene testing, making MultiGene Panel Testing cheaper, faster and more efficient. Further, single-test multigene multiplexing strategy analyzes numerous cancer susceptibility genes and frequently detects highly penetrant, clinically actionable Pathogenic Germline Variants (PGV) in individuals whose clinical histories fail to fulfill syndrome-specific testing criteria. This is clinically relevant, as it has become increasingly complex to determine which individuals warrant germline testing.

Several risk assessment models have been developed to provide probability of an individual carrying a germline mutation. However, these models only provide syndrome-specific risk assessment for Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)), etc., and there is significant need for a risk assessment model tailored toward MultiGene Panel Testing.

The PREMM (PREdiction Model for gene Mutations) model has been rigorously tested, and is widely recognized and recommended by several professional societies, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American College of Gastroenterology, and the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. The PREMMplus model is a clinical prediction algorithm (tool) that estimates the cumulative probability of an individual carrying a germline mutation in 19 genes linked to cancer. Individuals are considered to be high risk if they have a risk score greater than 2.5%, and are eligible for genetic evaluation to determine if they indeed harbor germline mutations, and these individuals in turn could benefit from measures to prevent the cancer, or detect cancer early.

This aim of this study was to develop and validate PREMMplus clinical risk assessment tool (clinical prediction model) that could be used to identify individuals who are likely to have Pathogenic Germline Variant and should undergo MultiGene Panel Testing. PREMMplus was designed to identify individuals carrying Pathogenic Germline Variants in 19 cancer susceptibility genes broadly categorized by phenotypic overlap and/or relative penetrance, and they included 11 Category A genes (APC, BRCA1/2, CDH1, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, biallelic MUTYH, PMS2, and TP53) and 8 Category B genes (ATM, BRIP1, CDKN2A, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, and RAD51D). Assessment of germline variant pathogenicity was based on the most recent classification made by the clinical laboratory, performing MultiGene Panel Testing. This clinical prediction model was designed to achieve both high sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) across a diverse spectrum of syndromes, used clinical data only, did not require tumor tissue thus facilitating scalability, and was adaptable to allow for future expansion, as new genes became incorporated into routine MultiGene Panel Testing.

Clinical predictors for this model included demographics (sex, ancestry, and age at testing), as well as personal, and family history of specific cancers in first- and second-degree relatives. EIGHTEEN cancer types were selected for PREMMplus development, including both common malignancies such as breast cancer and colorectal cancer and uncommon malignancies such as sarcoma and adrenocortical carcinoma, associated with inherited risk. Individuals were excluded from analysis if a personal and family history of any of these 18 cancers were not available, and/or if age at MultiGene Panel Testing was missing. Individuals with 2 or more Pathogenic Germline Variants were excluded from the development cohort.

The performance of this clinical model was validated in nonoverlapping data sets of 8,691 and 14,849 individuals with prior MultiGene Panel Testing ascertained from clinic and laboratory-based settings, respectively.

PREMMplus demonstrated high sensitivity and high Negative Predictive Value for identifying individuals with Pathogenic Germline Variants in the 19 different cancer susceptibility genes. PREMMplus demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.9%, 91.7%, and 89.3% and Negative Predictive Value of 98.3%, 97.5%, and 97.8% for identifying Category A gene Pathogenic Germline Variants carriers, in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. PREMMplus demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.9%, 85.6%, and 84.2% and Negative Predictive Value of 95.0%, 93.5%, and 93.5% for identifying Category A/B gene Pathogenic Germline Variants carriers in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Overall, 9.4%, 10.8%, and 9.2% of the development, clinic-based validation, and laboratory-based validation cohorts, respectively, harbored a Pathogenic Germline Variant in one of the 19 PREMMplus genes.

It was concluded that PREMMplus accurately identifies individuals with Pathogenic Germline Variants in a diverse spectrum of cancer susceptibility genes, with high sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value. PREMMplus represents a new evidence-based approach and can be used to identify individuals who should undergo MultiGene Panel Testing.

Development and Validation of the PREMMplus Model for Multigene Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment. Yurgelun MB, Uno H, Furniss CS, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00120 Journal of Clinical Oncology

LYNPARZA® Superior to Next-Generation Hormonal Drug in CRPC Patients with Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Alterations

RR

SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 268,490 new cases of Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and 34,500 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of Prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced Prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention. Approximately 10-20% of patients with advanced Prostate cancer will progress to Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) within five years during ADT, and over 80% of these patients will have metastatic disease at the time of CRPC diagnosis. The malignant transformation of prostatic epithelial cell as well as the development of CRPC has been attributed to deleterious alterations in a variety of genes including loss-of-function alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) genes.

DNA damage is a common occurrence in daily life by UV light, ionizing radiation, replication errors, chemical agents, etc. This can result in single and double strand breaks in the DNA structure which must be repaired for cell survival. The two vital pathways for DNA repair in a normal cell are BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that recognize and repair double strand DNA breaks via Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Homologous Recombination is a type of genetic recombination, and is a DNA repair pathway utilized by cells to accurately repair DNA double-stranded breaks during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and thereby maintain genomic integrity. Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) is noted following mutation of genes involved in HR repair pathway. At least 15 genes are involved in the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM genes. Mutations in these genes predispose an individual to develop malignant tumors. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for about 20-25% of hereditary breast cancers and about 5-10% of all breast cancers. They also account for 15% of ovarian cancers, in addition to other cancers such as Colon and Prostate. BRCA mutations can either be inherited (Germline) and present in all individual cells or can be acquired and occur exclusively in the tumor cells (Somatic). Somatic mutations account for a significant portion of overall BRCA1 and BRCA2 aberrations. Loss of BRCA function due to frequent somatic aberrations likely deregulates HR pathway, and other pathways then come in to play, which are less precise and error prone, resulting in the accumulation of additional mutations and chromosomal instability in the cell, with subsequent malignant transformation. Homologous Recombination Deficiency therefore indicates an important loss of DNA repair function.

The PARP (Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase), family of enzymes include, PARP1 and PARP2, and is a related enzymatic pathway that repairs single strand breaks in DNA. In a BRCA mutant, the cancer cell relies solely on PARP pathway for DNA repair to survive. PARP inhibitors trap PARP onto DNA at sites of single-strand breaks, preventing their repair and generating double-strand breaks that cannot be repaired accurately in tumors harboring defects in Homologous Recombination Repair pathway genes, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, and this leads to cumulative DNA damage and tumor cell death. LYNPARZA® (Olaparib) is a first-in-class PARP inhibitor and blocks DNA damage response in tumors harboring a deficiency in Homologous Recombination Repair, as is noted in those with mutations such as BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. LYNPARZA® showed promising results in a Phase II trial (TOPARP), when given as monotherapy, in patients with BRCA1/2 or ATM gene-mutated mCRPC, who had received a prior Taxane-based chemotherapy, and at least one newer hormonal agent (ZYTIGA® or XTANDI®).

PROfound is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, Phase III trial in which the efficacy and safety of LYNPARZA® was compared with physician’s choice of either XTANDI® or ZYTIGA® in two groups of patients with mCRPC, who had progressed on prior treatment with new hormonal anticancer treatments, and had a qualifying tumor mutation in one of 15 genes involved in the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Patients in Cohort A (N=245) had alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM genes while those in Cohort B (N=142) had alterations in any one of 12 other genes known to be involved in DNA repair which included BRIP1, BARD1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D or RAD54L. Patients were randomized 2:1 within each cohort to receive LYNPARZA® 300 mg orally BID or physician’s choice of XTANDI® 160 mg orally QD or ZYTIGA® 1000 mg orally QD along with Prednisone 5 mg orally BID. Patient characteristics were well-balanced between arms in each treatment group, median patient age was 68 years, approximately 25% of patients had de novo metastatic disease, about 65% of patients received prior Taxane therapy and more than 20% had received two lines of chemotherapy. Patients were allowed to cross over to LYNPARZA® upon progression. The Primary endpoint was radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) in Cohort A, assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR).

The authors had previously reported that in Cohort A, the median PFS was 7.4 months with LYNPARZA®, compared to 3.5 months in the control group (HR=0.34, P<0.0001). This represented a 66% greater delay in disease progression compared to hormonal therapy. The interim Overall Survival analysis in Cohort A showed that median OS was 18.5 months with LYNPARZA® compared to 15 months with control drug treatment (HR=0.64, P=0.0173). In Cohort A, the Objective Response Rate (ORR) was 33.3% with LYNPARZA® compared with 2.3% with control drug therapies (P<0.0001).

The authors in this publication reported the results of the prespecified Secondary endpoints, which included pain, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL), symptomatic Skeletal-Related Events, and time to first opiate use for cancer-related pain in Cohort A group of patients. Pain was assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, and HRQOL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). Cohort A included 245 patients with alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM genes, of whom 162 patients received the investigational agent LYNPARZA®, and 83 patients received control drug. The median duration of follow up at data cutoff was 6.2 months for all LYNPARZA® group patients and 3.5 months for the control group patients. The median time to pain progression was significantly longer with LYNPARZA® and was Not Reached in the LYNPARZA® group versus 9.92 months in the control group (HR=0.44; P=0.019). Pain interference scores were also significantly better in the LYNPARZA® group (difference in overall adjusted mean change from baseline score −0.85; nominal P=0.0004). Median time to progression of pain severity was Not Reached in either group. Among patients who had not used opiates at baseline (113 in the LYNPARZA® group, 58 in the control group), median time to first opiate use for cancer-related pain was 18.0 months in the LYNPARZA® group versus 7.5 months in the control group (HR=0.61; nominal P=0.044).

The proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvement in FACT-P total score during treatment was higher for the LYNPARZA® group than the control group (10% versus 1% respectively; odds ratio=8.32; nominal P=0.0065). The median time to first symptomatic Skeletal-Related Event was not reached for either treatment group and the proportions of patients remaining free of symptomatic Skeletal-Related Events were 89.5% versus 77.1% at 6 months and 77.6% versus 53.6% at 12 months, in the LYNPARZA® and control groups respectively.

It was concluded that LYNPARZA® was associated with reduced pain burden and better-preserved HRQOL compared with the two control drugs, in patients with metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Homologous Recombination Repair gene alterations, who had disease progression after a previous next-generation hormonal drug. The authors added that the study findings support the clinical benefit of improved radiographical Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival identified in PROfound trial.

Pain and health-related quality of life with olaparib versus physician’s choice of next-generation hormonal drug in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair gene alterations (PROfound): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Thiery-Vuillemin A, de Bono J, Hussain M, et al. The Lancet Oncology March 2022;23:393-405.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: Panitumumab Combined with mFOLFOX6 Improves Overall Survival in Left-Sided RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 151,030 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2022 and about 52,580 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

Approximately 15-25% of the patients with CRC present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (synchronous metastases) and 50-60% of the patients with CRC will develop metastatic disease during the course of their illness. First line treatment of metastatic CRC include Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan, in combination with a Fluoropyrimidine and Leucovorin (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI), along with a VEGF targeting agent such as Bevacizumab or EGFR targeting agents such as Cetuximab and Panitumumab. However numerous studies have failed to clearly establish that any of these combination regimens would be superior for any given patient based on clinical factors. Nonetheless, majority of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receive FOLFOX-based first line treatment in the US. 

A retrospective evaluation from the Phase III 80405 clinical trial which included data from 1,025 patients with KRAS wild-type disease, concluded that the biology of tumors originating in the right colon may be different from those originating in the left colon, with Cetuximab showing superiority over Bevacizumab, when combined with chemotherapy, in KRAS wild-type patients with left-sided colon cancer. (J Clin Oncol 34, 2016: suppl; abstr 3504).

Panitumumab (VECTIBIX®) is a human IgG2 kappa monoclonal antibody, that targets and antagonizes Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). The PARADIGM Trial is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, Phase III study conducted in Japan, to evaluate the efficacy and superiority of mFOLFOX6 plus Panitumumab compared to mFOLFOX6 plus Bevacizumab, in the first line treatment of chemotherapy-naïve patients with RAS wild type (KRAS/NRAS gene) metastatic colorectal cancer and left-sided primary tumors (descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). In this first prospective randomized study, a total of 400 patients received Panitumumab and 402 received Bevacizumab. Both groups received mFOLFOX6. Most of the patients had left sided tumors (N=614) of whom 312 patients received Panitumumab with chemotherapy, whereas 292 patients received Bevacizumab with chemotherapy. The Primary endpoint of Overall Survival (OS) was hierarchically tested in patients with left-sided tumors, followed by evaluation in the entire study population. Key Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), and curative resection (R0) rate. Overall Survival in patients with left-sided tumors was analyzed after a median follow up of 61 months.

The study met its Primary endpoint and Panitumumab in combination with mFOLFOX6 significantly improved median Overall Survival, compared to Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in the left-sided tumor population, with a 18% lower risk of death (37.9 months versus 34.3 months; HR=0.82; P=0.031). When the data was subsequently analyzed for the entire study group, the OS benefit also significantly favored Panitumumab combination over Bevacizumab combination (median 36.2 months versus 31.3 months; HR=0.84; P=0.030). This difference however appears to be driven by the left-sided tumor population, as there was no significant OS improvement seen for patients with right-sided tumors in an exploratory analysis (median 20.2 months versus 23.2 months; HR=1.09).

There was no significant difference in the median PFS between treatment groups in the population with left-sided tumors and the median PFS was 13.7 months with Panitumumab combination and 13.2 months with Bevacizumab combination (HR=0.98). However, both Objective Response Rate and curative (R0) resection rate was higher in the Panitumumab group compared with Bevacizumab group, in the population with left-sided tumors. The Objective Response Rate was 80.2% versus 68.6%, the curative (R0) resection rate 18.3% versus 11.6% and the median duration of response was 13.1 versus 11.2 months respectively. Treatment with Panitumumab, resulted in more skin, mucosal and nail toxicities, commonly associated with EGFR inhibitors, and no new safety signal were observed.

It was concluded that in this first and largest randomized first line study comparing the efficacy of different targeted therapies in combination with standard doublet chemotherapy based on tumor sidedness, Panitumumab in combination with mFOLFOX6 significantly improved Overall Survival, resulted in a higher Objective Response Rate and a higher curative resection rate, in patients with RAS wild-type and left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer, compared with patients who received Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6. These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive biomarker testing, as well as taking into consideration tumor location, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Panitumumab (PAN) plus mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab (BEV) plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the phase 3 PARADIGM trial. Yoshino T, Watanabe J, Shitara K, et al. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA1 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 17_suppl (June 10, 2022) LBA1.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: Adagrasib in KRAS G12C Mutated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

The KRAS (kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) proto-oncogene encodes a protein that is a member of the small GTPase super family. The KRAS gene provides instructions for making the KRAS protein, which is a part of a signaling pathway known as the RAS/MAPK pathway. By relaying signals from outside the cell to the cell nucleus, the protein instructs the cell to grow, divide and differentiate. The KRAS protein is a GTPase, and converts GTP into GDP. To transmit signals, the KRAS protein must be turned on by binding to a molecule of GTP. When GTP is converted to GDP, the KRAS protein is turned off or inactivated, and when the KRAS protein is bound to GDP, it does not relay signals to the cell nucleus. The KRAS gene is in the Ras family of oncogenes, which also includes two other genes, HRAS and NRAS. When mutated, oncogenes have the potential to change normal cells cancerous.

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers and are often associated with resistance to targeted therapies and poor outcomes. The KRAS G12C mutation occurs in approximately 25% of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLC) and in 3-5% of colorectal cancers and other solid cancers. KRAS G12C is one of the most prevalent driver mutations in NSCLC and accounts for a greater number of patients than those with ALK, ROS1, RET, and TRK 1/2/3 mutations combined. KRAS G12C cancers are genomically more heterogeneous and occur more frequently in current or former smokers, and are likely to be more complex genomically than EGFR mutant or ALK rearranged cancers. G12C is a single point mutation with a Glycine-to-Cysteine substitution at codon 12. This substitution favors the activated state of KRAS, resulting in a predominantly GTP-bound KRAS oncoprotein, amplifying signaling pathways that lead to oncogenesis.

Adagrasib is a potent, orally available, small molecule covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C. This drug irreversibly and selectively binds KRAS G12C in its inactive, GDP-bound state. Unlike LUMAKRAS® (Sotorasib), which is also a selective covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C, Adagrasib has a longer drug half-life of 23 hours, as compared to 5 hours for LUMAKRAS®, has dose-dependent extended exposure, and can penetrate the CNS. Approximately, 27-42% of patients with NSCLC harboring KRAS G12C mutations have CNS metastases, with poor outcomes.

KRYSTAL-1 is a Phase I/II multiple expansion cohort trial involving patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a KRAS G12C mutation. Adagrasib demonstrated clinical activity in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers. Further, preliminary data from two patients with untreated CNS metastases from a Phase 1b cohort showed antitumor activity against CNS metastases, with satisfactory concentrations of Adagrasib in the CSF.

The researchers in this publication reported the results from Cohort A, a Phase 2 cohort of the KRYSTAL-1 study in which Adagrasib at a dose of 600 mg orally twice daily was evaluated in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, previously treated with chemotherapy and anti-Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) or Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. This registration study included a total of 116 unresectable or metastatic NSCLC patients, with histologically confirmed diagnosis, with KRAS G12C mutation (detected in tumor tissue at a local or central laboratory), who had previously received treatment with at least one platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen and checkpoint inhibitor therapy (in sequence or concurrently), and who had measurable tumor lesions. Enrolled patients received Adagrasib 600 mg capsule twice daily, and treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The median patient age was 64 years, 97% had adenocarcinoma histology, 98% had both platinum based therapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and 21% of patients had CNS metastases. Key exclusion criteria included active CNS metastases (patients were eligible if CNS metastases were adequately treated and neurologically stable), carcinomatous meningitis, and previous treatment with a KRAS G12C inhibitor. Exploratory Biomarker Analyses included candidate biomarkers (PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score and mutational status of STK11, KEAP1, TP53, and CDKN2A on tumor-tissue specimens, blood specimens, or both, for their association with tumor response. The Primary end point was Objective Response Rate as assessed by blinded Independent Central Review. Secondary end points included the Duration of Response, Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival, and safety.

The median follow up was 12.9 months and the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months. The confirmed Objective Response Rate was 42.9% and the median Duration of Response was 8.5 months. The median Progression Free Survival was 6.5 months and the median Overall Survival was 12.6 months, at a median follow up of 15.6 months. Among 33 patients with previously treated, stable CNS metastases, the intracranial confirmed Objective Response Rate was 33.3%. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.4% of the patients and 53% were Grade 1 or 2 toxicities. Adagrasib was discontinued in 6.9% of patients due to adverse events.

It was concluded that among patients with previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, Adagrasib showed significant clinical efficacy without new safety signals, and encouraging intracranial activity. The researchers added that these are the first clinical data demonstrating CNS-specific activity of a KRAS G12C inhibitor in this patient population.

Adagrasib in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a KRASG12C Mutation. Jänne PA, Riely GJ, Gadgeel SM, et al. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619

Consider Guideline-Recommended Biomarker Testing as an Integral Component of NSCLC Care

RR

The NSCLC Landscape Has Evolved Significantly Due Largely to the Growing Number of Actionable Mutations1

Despite advancements in standard-of-care, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to burden patients, with poor survival outcomes.2,3 NSCLC has been identified as the leading cause of cancer death worldwide with an estimated 1.8 million deaths in 2020.2 As the number of targeted therapies and approved companion diagnostics continues to grow, mortality and survival rates have begun to improve.3 With the addition of KRAS G12C, there are 9 actionable molecular biomarkers (as of February 2022) and more than 20 targeted therapies approved for use in advanced NSCLC.1,4 Guidelines recommend biomarker testing for all eligible patients at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC regardless of characteristics such as smoking history, race, or histology.5,6 Unfortunately, real-world evidence shows that far too many patients fail to receive the comprehensive biomarker testing.7

Adherence to Guidelines Can Improve Patient Outcomes8

As targeted therapies are approved, guidelines continue to update their recommendations on biomarker testing.5 As of March 2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for NSCLC recommend broad molecular testing of actionable and emerging biomarkers for eligible patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC (Figure 1).5 Similarly, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) endorsed the 2018 College of American Pathologists (CAP)/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines, recommending comprehensive cancer panel testing for genetic biomarkers.9,10

Figure 1: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for NSCLC5,*,†Advanced-Non-Squamous-NSCLC*The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for NSCLC provide recommendations for certain individual biomarkers that should be tested and recommend testing techniques but do not endorse any specific commercially available biomarker assays or commercial laboratories.5†The NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC recommend broad molecular testing to identify rare driver variants for which targeted therapies may be available to ensure patients receive the most appropriate treatment.5‡KRAS G12C and EGFR exon 20 mutations are used to determine subsequent (ie, second-line and beyond) therapy using targeted agents or other novel agents.5 §The definition of high-level MET amplification is evolving and may differ according to the assay used for testing. For NGS-based results, a copy number greater than 10 is consistent with high-level MET amplification.5 **For oncogenic or likely oncogenic HER2 mutations, refer to definitions at oncokb.org.5

Although adherence to guideline-recommended biomarker testing is associated with improved patient outcomes, real-world EMR data reveals suboptimal biomarker testing rates.8,11 In a retrospective study,†† 81% of patients with metastatic NSCLC did not receive testing for ALK, EGFR, ROS1, and BRAF before initiation of first-line treatment, despite availability of targeted therapies.11 Moreover, only 28% of patients received testing for all four genetic biomarkers and PD-L1 during the study period.11 In another retrospective study, less than 50% of patients with metastatic NSCLC received testing for all five biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, PD-L1) (Figure 2).7

Beyond the underutilization of biomarker testing, there remains an even greater need to increase broad molecular testing among racial and ethnic minority groups in the US.12,13 In one retrospective study, Black/African American patients with advanced NSCLC had significantly lower rates of testing with NGS assays (39.8%) compared with White patients (50.1%) (Figure 3).12

††A retrospective study assessing real-world biomarker testing patterns in patients with de novo mNSCLC (N=2,257) in the community oncology setting using the US Oncology Network electronic health records between January 1st, 2017 and September 31st, 2019 with follow-up through December 31st, 2019.11

Figure 2: MYLUNG Consortium™ EMR Analysis of Patients With Metastatic NSCLC7,‡‡MYLUNG-Consortium‡‡A retrospective, observational study assessing real-world biomarker testing patterns in patients with metastatic NSCLC(N=3,474) from community oncology practices within the US Oncology Network community practices between 2018 and 2020.7
Figure 3: EMR Analysis of Biomarker Testing in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC12,§§
EMR-Analysis-of-Biomarker-Testing§§From a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced/metastatic: NSCLC (N=14,768) from ~800 sites of care identified via the Flatiron Electronic Health Record Database between 2017 and 2020. Of this study cohort, patients included White (n=9,793), Black/African American (n=1,288), and non-squamous NSCLC (n=10,333).

Collectively, these findings highlight the disparity in proactive disease management across different patient populations.7,11,12

Considerations Across the Biomarker Testing Journey

There are several different methods in which eligible patients can be tested for actionable genetic alterations, each with unique considerations as indicated below (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Comparing Biomarker Testing Methods and Sample Types
Comparing-Biomarker-Testing-Methods***Data from a review of common molecular assays for biomarker testing that analyzed common detected variants, sensitivities, and turnaround time.6 †††cfDNA refers to all circulating DNA (largely non-malignant), while ctDNA refers to the tumor-related component of cfDNA.15 ‡‡‡Data from a prospective study that enrolled patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC undergoing SOC tissue genotyping and comprehensive cfDNA analysis, with turnaround time defined as the number of days between test order date and the retrieval of test results.16

While tissue biopsy remains the “gold standard” in NSCLC, it may not be feasible (insufficient tissue) or pragmatic (urgent need to begin treatment) in all patients.17 Plasma ctDNA demonstrates complementary results to tissue-based assays and can be considered a valid tool for genotyping of newly diagnosed patients with advanced NSCLC.15 In a prospective study of patients with previously untreated, non-squamous metastatic NSCLC from 2016 to 2018, guideline-recommended biomarkers with FDA-approved therapies (EGFR Exon 19 deletion and L858R, ALK fusion, ROS1 fusion, BRAF V600E) showed ≥ 98.2% concordance between tissue and liquid-based testing.16 While concordance is high for any single test, high concordance for full panels will be required for liquid biopsies to become standard; additionally, negative results on liquid biopsy still require validation with tissue testing.16,17

Liquid biopsy may offer improvements in sample acquisition and small tissue samples and provides less invasive procedures and shortened turnaround times.17 Other considerations for maximizing the tissue journey include the use of comprehensive testing, rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), and implementing reflex testing protocols with the help of a multidisciplinary team (MDT).17

Delays in Biomarker Testing Results May Impact Treatment Plan Decisions18

Longer turnaround times for molecular testing compared with turnaround times for PD-L1 testing by IHC may result in the initiation of immunotherapy before molecular testing results are received.18 Waiting for complete biomarker test results prior to initiating therapy can allow doctors to make the most informed decisions surrounding a patient’s treatment journey.18

Consider Comprehensive Biomarker Testing as an Important Part of Your Treatment Plan8

As the NSCLC landscape continues to progress with the increasing number of actionable biomarkers, there is a growing need for proactive and comprehensive molecular testing.7,17 Although real-world data has shown significant underuse of biomarker testing, rates can be improved with diligent observation of expanding guidelines and recommendations by expert panels and associations.7,8 In the coming years, clinicians may consider evolving institutional protocols, including enabling reflex testing, and work as an MDT to ensure biomarker testing is performed on all eligible patients with advanced NSCLC.17

[Abbreviations]
AA, African American; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; BRAF, proto-oncogene B-Raf; cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EMR, electronic medical record; ERBB2, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; MET, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition; mNSCLC, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NTRK, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; RET, rearranged during transfection; ROS1, c-ros oncogene 1; SOC, standard-of-care.

[References]
1. Majeed U, et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:108.
2. Sung H, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-249.
3. Siegel RL, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7-33.
4. Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov. Accessed October 6, 2021.
5. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. V.3.2022. ©National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed March 16, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.
6. Pennell NA, et al. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:531-542.
7. Robert NJ, et al. Presented at: The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 4–8, 2021; Virtual Meeting. Abstract 102.
8. John A, et al. Adv Ther. 2021;38:1552-1566.
9. Hanna N, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3484-3515.
10. Lindeman NI, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:321-346.
11. Nadler ES, et al. Presented at: The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 4–8, 2021; Virtual Meeting. Abstract 9079.
12. Bruno DS, et al. Presented at: The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 4–8, 2021; Virtual Meeting. Abstract 9005.
13. Hann KEJ, et al. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:503.
14. Pennell NA, et al. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:1-9.
15. Rolfo C, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:1647-1662.
16. Leighl NB, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:4691-4700.
17. Gregg JP, et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8:286-301.
18. Smeltzer MP, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:1434-1448.

USA-510-80864 02/22

Mutations of STK11/KRAS Genes and Efficacy of Immunotherapy in NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the T cells of the immune system. Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors include CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152) and PD-1(Programmed cell Death 1). Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response.

TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) is an anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibody, designed to directly bind to PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thereby blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors and thus enabling the activation of T cells. AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab) is a biologic antiangiogenic antibody, directed against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), and prevents the interaction of VEGF to its receptors (Flt-1 and KDR) on the surface of endothelial cells. The interaction of VEGF with its receptors has been shown to result in endothelial cell proliferation and new blood vessel formation. Combining TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® is supported by the following scientific rationale. AVASTIN® in addition to its established anti-angiogenic effects, may further enhance the ability of TECENTRIQ® to restore anti-cancer immunity, by inhibiting VEGF-related immunosuppression, promoting T-cell tumor infiltration and enabling priming and activation of T-cell responses against tumor antigens.

IMpower150 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, Phase III study, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TECENTRIQ® in combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel with or without AVASTIN®, in patients with Stage IV, treatment naïve, non-squamous NSCLC. This study enrolled 1,202 patients, who were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either TECENTRIQ® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (ACP-Group A), TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (ABCP-Group B), or AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (BCP-Group C – control arm). During the treatment-induction phase, patients in Group A received TECENTRIQ® 1200 mg IV along with Carboplatin AUC 6 and Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles. Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance treatment with TECENTRIQ® on the same dose schedule until disease progression. Patients in Group B received AVASTIN® 15 mg/kg IV, along with TECENTRIQ®, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel IV, Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles followed by maintenance treatment with the TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® until disease progression. Patients in the control Group C received AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 4 or 6 cycles followed by AVASTIN® maintenance treatment until disease progression. Among randomized patients with tumors demonstrating no ALK and EGFR mutations, ABCP was associated with significant improvements in Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), compared with BCP, in an updated OS analysis. ABCP also prolonged OS and PFS compared with BCP in an exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations.

The Serine‐Threonine Kinase 11 (STK11) gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 19 and germline STK11 mutations are often detected in Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome, an Autosomal Dominant disorder resulting in mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation, hamartomas throughout the gastrointestinal tract, and a predisposition for breast, lung, pancreas, and gastrointestinal malignancies including cancers of the colon and small bowel. Both STK11 (also called LKB1) and KEAP1 mutation occur in about 17% of NSCLC (adenocarcinomas), respectively, and correlates with poor outcome with immune checkpoint inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy have demonstrated survival benefit in patients with KRAS mutated tumors, it remains unclear how co-occurring STK11, KEAP1, and TP53 mutations affect outcomes following immune checkpoint blockade.

The authors in this publication conducted a retrospective exploratory analysis of the efficacy of ABCP (TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel), in patients with KRAS mutations and co-occuring STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 mutations, from the IMpower150 nonsquamous NSCLC patient population. Mutation status was determined by circulating tumor DNA Next-Generation Sequencing.

Among the KRAS mutated population, there was numerical improvement in median OS with ABCP compared to BCP (19.8 vs 9.9 months; HR=0.50), as well as PFS (8.1 vs 5.8 months; HR=0.42) respectively. The median OS with ACP (TECENTRIQ® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) was 11.7 vs 9.9 months (HR=0.63), and PFS was 4.8 vs 5.8 months (HR=0.80), when compared with BCP (AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel). When compared to BCP, the ABCP group showed numerically greater survival than the ACP group among KRAS mutated patients. These results were consistent with reported survival improvements with immune checkpoint inhibitors in KRAS-mutant NSCLC.

In KRAS mutant patients across PD-L1 subgroups, OS and PFS were longer with ABCP when compared with BCP, but in PD-L1-low and PD-L1-negative subgroups, OS with ACP was similar to BCP. Conversely, in KRAS wild type patients, OS was longer with ACP than with ABCP or BCP across PD-L1 subgroups.

KRAS was frequently comutated with STK11, KEAP1, and TP53 and these subgroups conferred different prognostic outcomes. Within the KRAS mutated population, STK11 and/or KEAP1 mutations were associated with inferior OS and PFS across treatments compared with STK11-wild type and/or KEAP1wild type. In KRAS mutated patients with co-occurring STK11 and/or KEAP1 mutations (44.9%) or TP53 mutations (49.3%), survival was longer with ABCP than with ACP or BCP.

It was concluded that this analysis supported previous findings of mutation of STK11 and/or KEAP1 as poor prognostic indicators. Even though the clinical efficacy of ABCP (TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) and ACP (TECENTRIQ® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) was favorable compared with BCP (AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) in these mutational subgroups, survival benefits were greater in the KRAS mutated and KEAP1 and STK11 wild type population versus KRAS mutated and KEAP1 and STK11 mutated population, suggesting both prognostic and predictive value of mutational analysis. The researchers added that these results suggest that TECENTRIQ® in combination with AVASTIN® and chemotherapy is an efficacious first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC subgroups with KRAS mutations co-occurring with STK11 and/or KEAP1 or TP53 mutations and/or high PD-L1 expression.

Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS- mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 comutations: subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial. West JH, McCleland M, Cappuzzo, F, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Feb;10(2):e003027. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003027.

TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® Combo Improve Survival in IDH1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 20,050 new cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) will be diagnosed in the United States and 11,540 patients will die of the disease. AML can be considered as a group of heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior and outcomes. Cytogenetic analysis has been part of routine evaluation when caring for patients with AML. By predicting resistance to therapy, tumor cytogenetics will stratify patients, based on risk and help manage them accordingly. Even though cytotoxic chemotherapy may lead to long term remission and cure in a minority of patients with favorable cytogenetics, patients with high risk features such as unfavorable cytogenetics, molecular abnormalities, prior Myelodysplasia and advanced age, have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy alone. AML mainly affects older adults and the median age at diagnosis is 68 years. A significant majority of patients with AML are unable to receive intensive induction chemotherapy due to comorbidities and therefore receive less intensive, noncurative regimens, with poor outcomes.

Isocitrate DeHydrogenase (IDH) is a metabolic enzyme that helps generate energy from glucose and other metabolites, by catalyzing the conversion of Isocitrate to Alpha-Ketoglutarate. Alpha-ketoglutarate is required to properly regulate DNA and histone methylation, which in turn is important for gene expression and cellular differentiation. IDH mutations lead to aberrant DNA methylation and altered gene expression thereby preventing cellular differentiation, with resulting immature undifferentiated cells. IDH mutations can thus promote leukemogenesis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and tumorigenesis in solid tumors and can result in inferior outcomes. There are three isoforms of IDH. IDH1 is mainly found in the cytoplasm, as well as in peroxisomes, whereas IDH2 and IDH3 are found in the mitochondria, and are a part of the Krebs cycle. Approximately 20% of patients with AML, 70% of patients with Low-grade Glioma and secondary Glioblastoma, 50% of patients with Chondrosarcoma, 20% of patients with Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 30% of patients with Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and 8% of patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes/Myeloproliferative neoplasms, are associated with IDH mutations.MOA-of-Ivosidenib

TIBSOVO® (Ivosidenib) is a first-in-class, oral, potent, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1. The FDA in 2018, approved TIBSOVO® for adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation and in 2019 approved TIBSOVO® for newly diagnosed AML with a susceptible IDH1 (Isocitrate DeHydrogenase-1) mutation, in patients who are at least 75 years old or who have comorbidities that preclude the use of intensive induction chemotherapy. VIDAZA® (Azacitidine) is a hypomethylating agent that promotes DNA hypomethylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases. VIDAZA® has been shown to significantly improve Overall Survival (OS) when compared to conventional care regimens in elderly unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. In a Phase Ib trial, TIBSOVO® in combination with VIDAZA® showed encouraging clinical activity in newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated AML patients.

AGILE is a global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial in which the efficacy and safety of a combination of TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® were assessed, as compared with placebo and VIDAZA®, in patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia, who were ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive TIBSOVO® 500 mg orally once daily combined with VIDAZA® 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or IV for 7 days in 28-day cycles (N=72) or placebo and VIDAZA® (N=74). All the patients were to be treated for a minimum of six cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The median patient age was 76 years, 75% had primary AML and 25% had secondary AML, 67% had intermediate cytogenetic risk and 22% had poor cytogenetic risk. Patients were stratified according to geographic region and disease status (Primary versus Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia). The Primary end point was Event-Free Survival, defined as the time from randomization until treatment failure (failure of complete remission by week 24), relapse from remission, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.

At a median follow-up of 12.4 months, Event-Free Survival was significantly longer in the TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® group than in the placebo and VIDAZA® group (HR=0.33; P=0.002). This benefit was seen across all key subgroups. The estimated probability that a patient would remain event-free at 12 months was 37% in the TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® group and 12% in the placebo and VIDAZA® group. The median Overall Survival was 24.0 months with TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® and 7.9 months with placebo and VIDAZA® (HR=0.44; P=0.001). Among those patients who were dependent on transfusion of red blood cells, platelets, or both at baseline, a higher percentage of patients converted to transfusion independence with TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA®, than with placebo and VIDAZA® (46% versus 18%; P=0.006). Health-Related Quality of Life scores favored TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® across all subscales. Grade 3 or higher Adverse Events included febrile neutropenia (28% with TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® versus 34% with placebo and VIDAZA®) and neutropenia (27% versus 16%, respectively). Differentiation syndrome of any grade occurred in 14% of the patients receiving TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® versus 8% among those receiving placebo and VIDAZA®.

It was concluded that a combination of TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® significantly improved Event-Free Survival, Response Rates, and Overall Survival, as compared with placebo and VIDAZA®, in patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia, who were ineligible for induction chemotherapy. The authors added that treatment with TIBSOVO® and VIDAZA® resulted in better Quality of Life and higher rates of transfusion independence.

Ivosidenib and Azacitidine in IDH1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Montesinos P, Recher C, Vives S, et al. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:1519-1531.