Author: RR

Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. Majority of these patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and are often cured with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However approximately 20% of patients will experience local recurrence or distant relapse during the first 10 years of treatment.

The median age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in the US is 62 years and approximately 26% of breast cancer diagnoses are in women 65 to 74 years of age. Patient undergoing breast conserving surgery, often receive adjuvant breast radiation therapy to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Radiation therapy however is inconvenient, expensive and is associated with acute and late toxicities. Avoidance of radiation in elderly patients with low risk disease has remained controversial due to the lack of long term Level 1 evidence. In the LUMINA trial and PRIME II study of women over 55 years of age with low risk breast cancer, after a median follow up of 5 years, 5-year rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was low at 2-4% among those women who did not receive adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. The researchers herein reported the 10-year outcomes of the PRIME II trial.

PRIME II is a Phase III randomized clinical trial of the omission of breast irradiation, designed by the Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group (SCTBG). This study included women 65 years of age or older, who had Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, node-negative, T1 or T2 primary breast cancer (with tumors 3 cm or less in the largest dimension), treated with breast-conserving surgery with clear excision margins and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients were eligible if they had either cancer with Grade 3 histologic features or lymphovascular invasion but not both. A total of 1326 women were randomly assigned to receive 40-50 Gy whole-breast irradiation (N=658) or no radiation therapy (N=668). Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 70 years and less than 10% of patients had ER-low tumors. The Primary end point was local breast cancer recurrence. Regional recurrence, breast cancer–specific survival, distant recurrence as the first event, and Overall Survival were also assessed. The median follow up was 9.1 years.

The cumulative incidence of local breast cancer recurrence after 10 years of follow up was 9.5% in the no-radiotherapy group and 0.9% in the radiotherapy group (HR=10.4; P<0.001). Even though local recurrence was more common in the group that did not receive radiotherapy, there was no substantial difference in the 10-year incidence of distant recurrence as the first event between the two treatment groups (1.6% without radiotherapy and 3.0% with radiotherapy). Overall Survival at 10 years was almost identical in the two groups, at 80.8% with no radiotherapy and 80.7% with radiotherapy. The incidence of regional recurrence and breast cancer–specific survival also did not differ substantially between the two groups.

The authors concluded that omission of radiotherapy was associated with an increased incidence of local recurrence but had no detrimental effect on distant recurrence as the first event, or Overall Survival, among women 65 years of age or older, with Grade 1 or 2, Estrogen Receptor-high breast cancers, treated with breast-conserving surgery and 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer. Kunkler IH, Williams LJ, Jack WJL, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:585-594.

First-Line Time Limited Venetoclax Combinations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 18,740 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4490 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children. Patients with CLL often receive continuous therapy with either Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor, time limited therapy with BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax, given along with anti-CD20 antibody Obinutuzumab or under certain circumstances, chemoimmunotherapy.

Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor, and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. BTK inhibitors inhibit cell proliferation, and promote programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling. Three BTK inhibitors are presently approved by the FDA. They include first generation Ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA®) and second generation agents such as Acalabrutinib (CALQUENCE®) and Zanubrutinib (BRUKINSA®).

The pro-survival (anti-apoptotic) protein BCL2 is over expressed by CLL cells and regulates clonal selection and cell survival. A new class of anticancer agents known as BH3-mimetic drugs mimic the activity of the physiologic antagonists of BCL2 and related proteins and promote apoptosis (programmed cell death). Venetoclax (VENCLEXTA®) is a second generation, oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of BCL2 and restores the apoptotic processes in tumor cells.

In previously published studies, Venetoclax in combination with Obinutuzumab or Rituximab as first-line therapy led to a high incidence of undetectable Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and long Progression-Free Survival, among patients who are not fit, and patients with relapsed disease. However, there is no data from prospective, randomized clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab combination in fit patients with CLL with normal renal function. Combining BCL2 inhibitors with BTK inhibitors have induced undetectable Minimal Residual Disease and improved disease control.

GAIA-CLL13 trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, four-group, Phase III trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two fixed-duration regimens and one time-limited combination of Venetoclax plus anti-CD20 antibodies (Venetoclax-Rituximab, Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab, and Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab-Ibrutinib), as compared with chemoimmunotherapy, in the first-line treatment of young patients with CLL who are fit (low burden of coexisting conditions with no TP53 aberrations).

In this study, a total of 926 patients (N=926) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (N=229) or 12 cycles of treatment with either Venetoclax-Rituximab (N=237), Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab (N=229), or Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab-Ibrutinib (N=231). Chemoimmunotherapy consisted of Fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV and Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 IV, given on day 1-3 of each cycle, and patients older than 65 years of age received Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 2 of each cycle. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV was added to chemotherapy on day 1 of cycle 1, and at a dose of 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of each of the next five cycles.

The three experimental regimens contained Venetoclax 400 mg orally daily for ten 28-day cycles after a 5-week ramp-up phase from day 22 in cycle 1 until the end of cycle 2. In the Venetoclax-Rituximab group, Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of cycle 1 and at a dose of 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of each of the next five cycles. In the Obinutuzumab-containing regimens, Obinutuzumab was administered at a dose of 100 mg IV on day 1, 900 mg IV on day 2, and then 1000 mg IV on day 8 and 15 of cycle 1. On day 1 of the subsequent five cycles, Obinutuzumab was administered at a dose of 1000 mg IV. In the triple-combination regimen (Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab-Ibrutinib), Ibrutinib 420 mg orally daily was initiated along with the first Obinutuzumab infusion on day 1 of cycle 1 and was continued throughout the 12 treatment cycles, to which Venetoclax was added as described for the Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab regimen above. Ibrutinib was discontinued after two consecutive measurements of undetectable MRD or could be extended. The median patient age was 61 years and all the treatment groups were well balanced with respect to patient characteristics. The Primary end points were undetectable MRD ( less than 10−4, which meant less than 1 CLL cell in 10,000 leukocytes]) as assessed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood at month 15, and Progression Free Survival.

At 15 months, the percentage of patients with undetectable MRD, the Primary endpoint, was significantly higher in the Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab group (86.5%) and the Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab–Ibrutinib group (92.2%), compared to the chemoimmunotherapy group (52.0%), P<0.001 for both comparisons. However, the Primary endpoint of undetectable MRD was not significantly higher in the Venetoclax-Rituximab group compared to the chemoimmunotherapy group (57% versus 52%; P=0.32).

At a median follow up of 38.8 months, the interim analysis of 3-year Progression Free Survival (the second Primary end point) was superior in the Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab-Ibrutinib group (90.5%; HR=0.32; P<0.001) and the Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab group (87.7%; HR=0.42; P<0.001), compared to the chemoimmunotherapy group (75.5%). This PFS benefit was not seen in the in the Venetoclax-Rituximab group when compared to chemoimmunotherapy (80.8%; HR=0.79, P=0.18). Grade 3 and 4 infections were more common with chemoimmunotherapy (18.5%) and Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab–Ibrutinib (21.2%) than with Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab (13.2%) and Venetoclax-Rituximab (10.5%).

It was concluded that Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab combination with or without Ibrutinib was superior to chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment in fit patients with CLL, with higher rates of undetectable MRD and Progression Free Survival.

First-Line Venetoclax Combinations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Eichhorst B, Niemann CU, Kater AP, et al., for the GCLLSG, the HOVON and Nordic CLL Study Groups, the SAKK, the Israeli CLL Association, and Cancer Trials Ireland. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1739-1754

Interrupting Endocrine Therapy to Attempt Pregnancy after Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. Majority of these patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and are often cured with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However approximately 20% of patients will experience local recurrence or distant relapse during the first 10 years of treatment.

The median age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in the US is 62 years. However approximately 5% of new diagnoses each year occur in those who are under 40 years. These young patients with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer receive modern adjuvant endocrine therapy and have excellent long-term outcomes. Nonetheless, 40-60% of patients who are diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger are concerned about their future fertility and pregnancy, as many have not completed their family planning at diagnosis due to delay in childbearing. Pregnancy is contraindicated during endocrine therapy and a delay in pregnancy for 5-10 years can further reduce the chance of a subsequent live birth due to age related declines in fertility.

The POSITIVE (Pregnancy Outcome and Safety of Interrupting Therapy for Women with Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer) trial is a multicenter, global, single-arm prospective study, designed to evaluate whether temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. This study included 516 women with Stage I-III Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer, 42 years or less, who had received 18-30 months of adjuvant endocrine therapy and wished to interrupt endocrine therapy for pregnancy. The study permitted treatment interruption for up to 2 years (after a 3 month endocrine therapy washout period) to allow pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding, followed by endocrine therapy resumption to complete the planned duration of 5-10 of adjuvant endocrine therapy. The median time from breast cancer diagnosis to enrollment was 29 months. The median age was 37 years, 75% were nulliparous, fertility preservation was used by 51% of women, 93% had Stage I/II disease, 66% were node negative and 62% had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen alone was the most prescribed endocrine therapy (42%), followed by Tamoxifen plus Ovarian Function Suppression (OFS) (35%).

The Primary endpoint of the study was Breast Cancer-Free Interval (BCFI), defined as the time from study enrollment to the first invasive breast cancer event (local/regional/distant recurrence or contralateral breast cancer). Three interim safety analyses were conducted by a Data Safety Monitoring Committee, and determined that the trial would be suspended if there were more than 46 breast cancer recurrences within approximately 3 years of average follow-up. This threshold however was not reached.

At a median follow up of 41 months, of the 497 patients evaluated for pregnancy status, 74% (N=368) had at least one pregnancy, with 70% of the pregnancies occurring within 2 years. Additionally, 63.8% (N=317) had at least one live birth, with a total of 365 babies born. Birth defects were low at 2% and the rates of conception and childbirth were similar to rates in the general public. The 3-year breast cancer recurrence rate among patients who halted therapy was 8.9%, similar to the 9.2% rate in an external control cohort from the SOFT/TEXT trials, which examined adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients. Long term follow up is ongoing to assess recurrence risk over time, and trial participants were strongly recommended to resume endocrine therapy following their pregnancy attempts or success.

The authors concluded that among select women with previous Hormone Receptor–positive early breast cancer, temporary interruption of endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy did not confer a greater short-term risk of breast cancer events, including distant recurrence, than that in the external control cohort. These data provide guidance to younger patients diagnosed with early breast cancer on endocrine therapy, who may be hoping to have children, and such decisions should be made in close consultation with health professionals.

Interrupting Endocrine Therapy to Attempt Pregnancy after Breast Cancer. Partridge AH, Niman SM, Ruggeri M, et al., for the International Breast Cancer Study Group, and the POSITIVE Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1645-1656.

LONSURF® Plus Bevacizumab Improves Overall Survival in Advanced Refractory Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 153,020 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2023 and about 52,550 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

Approximately 15-25% of the patients with CRC present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (synchronous metastases) and 50-60% of the patients with CRC will develop metastatic disease during the course of their illness. First line treatment of metastatic CRC include Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan, in combination with a Fluoropyrimidine and Leucovorin (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI), along with a VEGF targeting agent such as Bevacizumab or EGFR targeting agents such as Cetuximab and Panitumumab. Patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer are now routinely analyzed for extended RAS and BRAF mutations. KRAS mutations are predictive of resistance to EGFR targeted therapy. Patients who progress following these therapies are considered to have refractory disease. These patients sometimes are rechallenged with previously administered chemotherapeutic agents, but often receive STIVARGA® (Regorafenib), an oral multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity, or LONSURF® (a fixed dose combination of Trifluridine and Tipiracil).

LONSURF® is a combination of two agents – a novel thymidine-based nucleoside analogue, Trifluridine and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, Tipiracil. Trifluridine incorporates into DNA resulting in DNA damage and cell death. Trifluridine however is rapidly metabolized when taken orally and this is prevented by Tipiracil, which increases the bioavailability of Trifluridine. LONSURF® was approved by the FDA in 2015 for the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC, who have been previously treated with Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-VEGF biological therapy and if RAS wild-type, an anti-EGFR therapy. This approval was based on the RECOURSE study, which is a pivotal, global, phase III trial in which LONSURF® significantly improved Overall Survival as well as Progression Free Survival, when compared to placebo in this patient population.

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF, a cytokine secreted by tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. VEGF is responsible for neoangiogenesis, proliferation, and metastasis, through its effects on endothelial cells. Bevacizumab was approved for the treatment of CRC in 2004. Maintenance of VEGF inhibition with Bevacizumab beyond disease progression has shown clinical activity in patients with metastatic CRC. A combination of LONSURF® in combination with Bevacizumab improved Overall Survival in several single-group and randomized Phase II trials.

SUNLIGHT trial is a multinational, multicenter, randomized Phase III study, designed to assess the efficacy and safety of LONSURF® in combination with Bevacizumab, as compared with LONSURF® alone, in patients with refractory metastatic CRC. In this study, a total of 492 patients with refractory metastatic CRC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LONSURF® along with Bevacizumab (N=246) or LONSURF® alone (N=246). Patients received LONSURF® 35 mg/m2 orally, twice daily, on days 1-5 and on days 8-12 every 28 days. Bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 15. The 28-day treatment cycle was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Bevacizumab monotherapy was not allowed. The two treatment groups were well balanced. Most patients (92%) had received two previous treatment regimens for metastatic disease, all patients had received previous Fluoropyrimidine-based therapy, 72% had received previous anti-VEGF therapy, 94% of the patients with RAS wild-type disease had received previous anti-EGFR therapy, and 30% had RAS wild-type disease. The Primary end point was Overall Survival. Secondary end points included Progression Free Survival, Objective Response and Disease Control Rate, Quality of Life and Safety. The median follow up was 14.2 months in the LONSURF® combination group and 13.6 months in the LONSURF® alone group.

The median Overall Survival was 10.8 months in the combination group and 7.5 months in the LONSURF® alone group (HR=0.61; P<0.001), suggesting a 39% reduction in the risk of death with the combination regimen. The median Progression Free Survival was 5.6 months in the combination group and 2.4 months in the LONSURF® alone group (HR=0.44; P<0.001). These benefits of LONSURF® plus Bevacizumab with respect to Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival were observed in all subgroups examined, including patients with poor prognostic factors. Survival benefits with the combination regimen were observed regardless of age, sex, location of primary disease, number of metastatic sites, RAS mutation status and previous treatment with Bevacizumab. The Objective Response Rate was 6.1% in the combination group versus 1.2% in the LONSURF® alone group. The median time to worsening of the ECOG PS from 0 or 1 to 2 or more was 9.3 months in the combination group and 6.3 months in the LONSURF® alone group (HR=0.54). The addition of Bevacizumab to LONSURF® did not increase the risk of serious adverse events or treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia, nausea, and anemia.

It was concluded from this study that among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment with LONSURF® plus Bevacizumab resulted in longer Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival, compared to LONSURF® alone, and this benefit was noted in all subgroups of patients.

Trifluridine–Tipiracil and Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Prager GW, Taieb J, Fakih M, et al., for the SUNLIGHT Investigators. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1657-1667

HER2DX Genomic Assay Predicts Pathological Response in Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence.

The HER or ERBB family of receptors, consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer are often treated with anti-HER2 targeted therapy along with chemotherapy, irrespective of hormone receptor status, and this has resulted in significantly improved treatment outcomes.

HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2. It binds to the extracellular subdomain IV of the receptor and disrupts ligand independent HER2 downstream cell signaling pathways. PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) is a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody that binds to the HER2 subdomain II and blocks ligand dependent HER2 heterodimerization with other HER receptors, ie., HER3, HER1 and HER4. Thus Trastuzumab along with Pertuzumab provide a more comprehensive blockade of HER2 driven signaling pathways, which has been attributed to differing mechanisms of action and synergistic interaction.

In the NeoSphere Phase II trial, among patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer, the addition of Pertuzumab to Trastuzumab and Docetaxel led to a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 16.8% increase in pathologic Complete Response rate (pCR) in the breast and a 17.8% increase in total pCR in the breast and axilla. Further, the addition of one year of Pertuzumab to Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy improved invasive Disease Free Survival, but this benefit was restricted to patients with node-positive disease and no Overall Survival benefit was observed. The benefits of Pertuzumab in early-stage HER2-positive disease were modest. Biomarkers beyond HER2 status are therefore needed, to guide the use of Pertuzumab in the treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

HER2DX (Reveal Genomics) is a novel clinically available genomic test that measures the expression of 27 genes from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) breast cancer tissues. This assay integrates biologic information such as Immune infiltration, luminal differentiation, tumor cell proliferation and HER2 amplicon expression from 4 gene signatures, with clinical data such as tumor stage and nodal stage.

The present study was conducted to determine if the use of HER2DX genomic assay in pretreatment baseline tissue samples of patients with early-stage ERBB2-positive breast cancer, predicted response to neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without Pertuzumab. This analysis is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in Spain from 2018 to 2022. In addition, a combined analysis with 2 previously reported trials of neoadjuvant cohorts, with results from the assay (DAPHNe and I-SPY2) was performed. All patients had Stage I-III ERBB2 (HER2) positive breast cancer, and clinical T1- T2 and node-positive disease was present in 72.9% and 63.9% patients, respectively, and 67.7% tumors were hormone receptor positive. The mean age was 50 years and all patients had Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded tumor specimens available prior to starting therapy. Patients received Trastuzumab, 8 mg/kg IV as a loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks in combination with Docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks and Carboplatin AUC of 6 IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, or this regimen plus Pertuzumab, 840 mg IV as a loading dose, followed by an 420 mg IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. HER2DX genomic assay was evaluated in 155 patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer. The main outcome measures were the association of baseline assay-reported pathologic Complete Response (pCR) score with pCR in the breast and axilla, as well as association of baseline assay-reported pCR score with response to Pertuzumab.

The overall pCR rate was 57.4%. The assay-reported pathologic Complete Response (pCR) score showed statistically significant association with pCR in the breast and axilla following Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy independent of Pertuzumab use. The pCR rates in the breast and axilla in the assay-reported pCR-high and pCR-low groups were 75.0% and 28.3%, respectively (Odds Ratio=7.85; P<0.001). In the combined analysis of DAPHNe and I-SPY2 trials (N=282), assay-reported pCR-high tumors had an increase in pCR rate in the breast and axilla with the use of Pertuzumab (Odds Ratio=5.36; P<0.001), and this benefit was not seen in the assay-reported pCR-low tumors (Odds Ratio=0.86; P=0.77). A statistically significant interaction was observed between the assay-reported pCR score and the effect of Pertuzumab on pCR in the breast and axilla.

It was concluded that HER2DX genomic assay provides clinically meaningful information to guide therapeutic decisions, and can predict pCR following neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without Pertuzumab, independent of known clinical-pathological variables and intrinsic subtype. This assay could guide therapeutic decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant Pertuzumab and can reliably identify patients who might be ideal candidates for neoadjuvant taxane, Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab.

Assessment of a Genomic Assay in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Based Chemotherapy With or Without Pertuzumab. Bueno-Muiño C, Echavarría I, López-Tarruella S, et al. JAMA Oncol. Published online April 27, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0187

Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO/ESTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

RR

SUMMARY: The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) convened a task force to review evidence and provide recommendations on the use of local therapy in the management of extracranial oligometastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Local therapy is defined as definitive comprehensive treatment of all known cancer (primary tumor, regional nodal metastases, and metastases). This joint guideline by ASTRO and ESTRO addressed 5 important questions focused on the use of local (radiation, surgery, other ablative methods) and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic NSCLC. The questions addressed clinical scenarios for using local therapy, sequencing and timing when integrating local with systemic therapies, radiation techniques critical for oligometastatic disease targeting and treatment delivery, and the role of local therapy for oligoprogression or recurrent disease.

Oligorecurrence refers to the general growth of limited numbers of metastatic deposits in patients off systemic therapy. For patients with oligometastates receiving active systemic treatment, they are considered as having oligoprogressive disease if current imaging establishes progression of disease in a limited number of existing and/or new sites, and oligopersistent disease if current imaging establishes stable disease or partial response to therapy, of the existing limited disease. The following recommendations were based on a systematic literature review, and created using ASTRO guidelines methodology. These recommendations focus on the management of extracranial disease with local therapy. This guideline and its recommendations with respect to the multimodally treatment strategy do not differentiate between patients with and without brain metastases.

Key Questions and Recommendations
What are the optimal patient/disease characteristics to select patients with oligometastatic NSCLC for definitive treatment combining systemic and local therapies?
1. Treatment decisions should be made using a patient-centered multidisciplinary team approach.
2. The integration of definitive local therapy is only recommended if technically feasible and clinically safe for all disease sites.
3. A discussion of definitive local therapy as a component of multimodality treatment approach is recommended irrespective of presence of activating driver mutations.
4. Definitive local therapy is recommended only for patients having up to 5 distant metastases, diagnosed with appropriate imaging. Implementation remark: Despite some prospective trials including patients with up to 5 extracranial metastases, most patients enrolled had 1-2 treated oligometastatic lesions, which should be factored into decision-making.
5. For patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, definitive local therapy to all cancer sites in addition to standard of care systemic therapy is conditionally recommended.
6. For patients with metachronous oligorecurrent NSCLC, definitive local therapy to all oligorecurrent cancer sites in addition to standard of care systemic therapy is conditionally recommended.
7. For patients with induced oligopersistent NSCLC, definitive local therapy to all persistent cancer sites in addition to standard of care systemic therapy is conditionally recommended.
8. For patients with induced oligoprogressive NSCLC receiving systemic therapy, definitive local therapy to all progressive cancer sites is conditionally recommended while continuing the current line of systemic therapy.

What are the selection criteria for choice of local treatment modality in the management of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC?
1. A patient-centered multidisciplinary discussion of the most appropriate local treatment strategy of RT and/or surgery, either alone or in combination, is recommended.
2. RT and/or surgery are recommended as definitive local treatment modalities for the locoregional primary and all oligometastases.
3. Highly conformal RT approaches and minimally invasive techniques for surgery are recommended to minimize morbidity.
4. Deciding between RT and surgery as the definitive local treatment modality should a) Favor RT when multiple organ systems are being treated b) Favor RT when the clinical prioritization is to minimize breaks from systemic therapy c) Favor surgery when large tissue sampling is needed for molecular testing, to guide systemic therapy.

What are the appropriate sequencing and timing of systemic therapy and definitive local therapies for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC?
1. For patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, 3 months or more of systemic therapy is recommended prior to definitive local therapy.
2. For patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, up-front definitive local treatment for symptomatic lesions should be prioritized. Implementation remark: Symptomatic disease sites (eg, brain metastases) are treated with up-front definitive local therapy.
3. For patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, the temporary pause of systemic therapy during definitive local therapy versus concomitant treatment should be discussed using a multidisciplinary team approach.
4. For patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, maintenance systemic therapy is conditionally recommended after completion of definitive local therapy.

What are the optimal dose-fractionation regimens, planning, and delivery technique of RT for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC?
1. Appropriate staging with FDG PET, cranial MRI, and MRI in cases of suspect or proven spine or liver metastases are recommended.
2. Individual assessment of respiratory motion for targets in the lungs and upper abdomen using 4-D CT, fluoroscopy, or MR-cine with appropriate motion compensation is recommended.
3. Highly conformal RT using inverse dose planning, appropriate motion management strategies and image-guided RT delivery are recommended.
4. A risk adapted approach using stereotactic RT (preferred), hypofractionated RT, or alternatively definitive chemoradiation based on the location and burden of disease is recommended.
5. Definitive local RT should use doses and fractionations which achieve durable local control.
Implementation remarks: a) Durable local control defined as minimum 85% local control at 2 years b) Higher BED10 (typically >75 Gy) with SBRT alone is associated with optimal local control c) Lower BED10 (50-75 Gy range) is associated with acceptable local control, typically in the setting of combination systemic therapy and SBRT.

After a definitive local therapy approach for oligometastatic NSCLC, what are the indications for additional local therapy upon disease progression?
1. Systemic therapy is recommended as the preferred treatment option.
2. Additional local therapy should be discussed using a multidisciplinary team approach.
3. Local therapy is conditionally recommended.
4. In patients previously treated with definitive local therapy for oligometastatic NSCLC who subsequently develop repeat oligoprogression or recurrence at sites previously treated with local therapy, re-treatment is conditionally recommended if systemic treatment options are limited, and local therapy can be delivered with toxicity acceptable to the multidisciplinary team and patient.

Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO/ESTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Iyengar P, All S, Berry MF, et al. Published:April 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2023.04.004

ORSERDU® for ESR-1 Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Approximately 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors. The most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer is Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer (65% of all metastatic breast tumors), and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 36 months. With the development of Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay, for the management of ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, as first line therapy. Even with this therapeutic combination, most patients will eventually experience disease progression, including the development of ESR1 (Estrogen Receptor gene alpha) mutations.

ESR1 (Estrogen Receptor 1) gene mutation is the most common acquired mutation noted in breast tumors as they progress from primary to metastatic setting. These mutations promote ligand independent Estrogen Receptor activation and have been shown to promote resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy. It appears that ESR1 mutations are harbored in metastatic ER-positive breast cancers with prior Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) therapy, but not in primary breast cancers, suggesting that ESR1 mutations may be selected by prior therapy with an AI in advanced breast cancer. In a previously published study (JAMA Oncol.2016;2:1310-1315), ESR1 mutations Y537S and D538G mutations detected in baseline plasma samples from ER+/HER- advanced breast cancer patients, was associated with shorter Overall Survival. In this study it was noted that there was a three-fold increase in the prevalence of these mutations in patients who had failed first line hormonal therapy for metastatic disease, compared with those who were initiating first line therapy for advanced breast cancer (33% versus 11%). It is estimated that 40% of ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients have tumors that harbor ESR1 mutations. It is best to test for ESR1 mutations with a liquid biopsy following progression on an AI and CDK 4/6 inhibitor.

Fulvestrant (FASLODEX®) is a parenteral, Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) and is the only SERD approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, acquired ESR1 mutations can also occur following Fulvestrant treatment, possibly because of poor bioavailability and incomplete ER blockade when administered intramuscularly. There is therefore an urgent unmet need for an alternate SERD that has activity in tumors harboring ESR1 mutations, and has improved bioavailability allowing oral administration.

ORSERDU® (Elacestrant) is an oral, nonsteroidal, Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) that degrades the Estrogen Receptor (ER) in a dose-dependent manner and inhibits estradiol-dependent functions of ER target gene transcription induction and breast cancer cell proliferation. Estradiol-stimulated tumor growth was diminished by ORSERDU® in the HR-positive xenograft models derived from heavily pretreated patients, including models resistant to CDK 4/6 inhibitors, Fulvestrant and those harboring ESR1 mutations Y537S and D538G. In an early Phase I trial, ORSERDU® was noted to have an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent activity with confirmed Partial Responses in heavily pretreated patients with HR-positive metastatic breast cancer.

EMERALD trial is a multicenter, International, randomized, open-label, Phase III study, designed to evaluate the benefit of ORSERDU® in patients with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer. In this study, 478 postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either ORSERDU® 400 mg orally daily (N=239) or the Standard of Care which included investigator’s choice of Fulvestrant or an Aromatase Inhibitor including Anastrozole, Letrozole, or Exemestane (N=239). Treatment was given until disease progression. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 63 years, and patients must have progressed or relapsed on or after 1 or 2 lines of endocrine therapy for advanced disease, one of which was given in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, had 1 or fewer lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease, and had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. ESR1 mutational status was determined by blood circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) using the Guardant360 CDx assay and was limited to ESR1 missense mutations in the ligand binding domain. In the study, 48% (N=228) had tumors with mutated ESR1 and 43% received two prior endocrine therapies. These patients were evenly distributed in both treatment groups. Patients were stratified by ESR1-mutation status, prior treatment with Fulvestrant, and visceral metastases. The co-Primary end points were Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the overall population, and in those with ESR1 mutations. Overall Survival (OS) was a Secondary end point.

This study met both co-Primary endpoints and treatment with ORSERDU® resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, compared with Standard of Care treatment. In the group of patients whose tumors had ESR1 mutations, the median PFS was 3.8 months in the ORSERDU® group and 1.9 months in the Standard of Care group (HR=0.55; P=0.0005), reducing the risk of progression or death by 45%. A post-hoc analysis of the PFS results based on the duration of prior CDK4/6 inhibitors usage was presented at San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) in December 2022. The median PFS was 8.6 months in the ORSERDU® group versus 1.9 months in the Standard of Care group, in those patients whose tumors harbored ESR1 mutations and had been treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitors for at least 12 months.

It can be concluded from this study that ORSERDU® is the first oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader for ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients with ESR1 mutations, and offers a novel therapeutic option for this patient group.

Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial. Bidard F-C, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, et al. J Clin Oncol, 1;40(28):3246-3256. DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.00338.

 

BRUKINSA® for First Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 18,740 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4490 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children.

Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. BTK inhibitors inhibit cell proliferation and promotes programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling.

Zanubrutinib (BRUKINSA®) is an irreversible, potent, next-generation, small molecule inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase, designed to deliver targeted and sustained inhibition of the BTK protein by optimizing bioavailability, half-life, and selectivity, while minimizing off-target inhibition of TEC- and EGFR-family kinases. It has been hypothesized that the increased selectivity of BRUKINSA® may minimize toxicities, (such as those often associated with Ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA®) and improve efficacy outcomes. BRUKINSA® demonstrated promising efficacy among patients with CLL/SLL (Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma), in early phase trials.

SEQUOIA is a randomized, multicenter, global Phase III trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BRUKINSA® compared to Bendamustine plus Rituximab in patients with treatment naïve CLL or SLL. This trial consists of three cohorts:
Cohort 1 (N=479): Patients NOT harboring del(17p) were randomized 1:1 to receive BRUKINSA® (N=241) or Bendamustine plus Rituximab (N=238) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with del(17p) were not randomized to Bendamustine plus Rituximab, as they experience poor clinical outcomes and poor response to chemoimmunotherapy. Data from this group comprise the Primary endpoint
Cohort 2 (N=110): Patients WITH del(17p) received BRUKINSA® as a monotherapy.
Cohort 3 (enrollment ongoing): Patients WITH del(17p) or pathogenic TP53 variant receiving BRUKINSA® in combination with Venetoclax.

Treatment in Cohort 1 consisted of BRUKINSA® 160 mg orally twice daily as 28-day cycles or Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 for six cycles plus Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV, the day before or on Day 1 of Cycle 1, and 500 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6. Both treatment groups were well balanced, with more than 50% with unmutated IGHV gene and 18% with del(11q) in each group. Eligible patients had untreated CLL or SLL requiring treatment as per International Workshop on CLL criteria, were 65 years or older, or 18 years or older with comorbidities, WITHOUT del(17p), and had an ECOG PS of 0-2. The Primary endpoint of the SEQUOIA trial was Progression Free Survival (PFS) per Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment in the randomized Cohort 1 group of patients. Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rates (ORR), Overall Survival (OS) and Safety.

At the interim analysis, with a median follow-up of 26.2 months, BRUKINSA demonstrated superiority in PFS over Bendamustine plus Rituximab. The median PFS was Not Reached in the BRUKINSA® group and was 33.7 months in the Bendamustine plus Rituximab group. The 24-month PFS rate was 85.5% in the BRUKINSA® group, compared to 69.5% in in the Bendamustine plus Rituximab group (HR=0.42; P<0.0001). This PFS benefit was consistently observed across key patient subgroups, including patients with del(11q), unmutated IGHV status, Binet Stage C, and bulky disease.

In a separate non-randomized group of patients in Cohort 2 of SEQUOIA trial, BRUKINSA® monotherapy was evaluated in 110 patients with previously untreated CLL/SLL, WITH 17p deletion. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) per IRC was 88% and the median Duration of Response (DOR) was not reached after a median follow-up of 25.1 months. The 18-month PFS in this group was 90.6%. Across clinical trials of BRUKINSA® the most common adverse events were neutropenia, upper respiratory tract infection, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage, and musculoskeletal pain. Atrial fibrillation or flutter were reported in 3.7% of patients.

The researchers from this study concluded that BRUKINSA® significantly improved Progression Free Survival compared to Bendamustine plus Rituximab, in patients with untreated CLL and SLL with an acceptable safety profile, like what has been reported in other BRUKINSA® clinical trials, with consistently low rates of atrial fibrillation. They added that BRUKINSA® as a highly selective BTK inhibitor, can potentially provide a chemo-free treatment option for CLL patients.

Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Tam CS, Brown JR, Kahl BS, et al. The Lancet Oncology 2022;23:1031-1043

FDA Approves POLIVY® for Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on April 19, 2023, approved Polatuzumab vedotin-piiq (POLIVY®) with a Rituximab product, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (R-CHP) for adult patients who have previously untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified (NOS), or High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma (HGBL) and who have an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 2 or greater.

The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2023, about 80,550 people will be diagnosed with Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in the United States and about 20,180 individuals will die of this disease. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the United States, and the incidence has steadily increased 3-4% each year. More than half of patients are 65 or older at the time of diagnosis and the incidence is likely to increase with aging of the American population. The etiology of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma is unknown. Contributing risk factors include immunosuppression (AIDS, transplantation setting, autoimmune diseases), UltraViolet radiation, pesticides, hair dyes, and diet.

DLBCL is a neoplasm of large B cells and the most common chromosome abnormality involves alterations of the BCL-6 gene at the 3q27 locus, which is critical for germinal center formation. Two major molecular subtypes of DLBCL arising from different genetic mechanisms have been identified, using Gene Expression Profiling: Germinal Center B-cell-like (GCB) and Activated B-Cell-like (ABC). Patients in the GCB subgroup have a higher 5-year survival rate, independent of clinical IPI (International Prognostic Index) risk score, whereas patients in the ABC subgroup have a significantly worse outcome. Regardless, R-CHOP regimen (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone), given every 21 days, for 6 cycles, delivered with curative intent, is the current standard of care for patients of all ages, with newly diagnosed DLBCL, regardless of molecular subtype. Approximately 30-40% of patients experience disease progression or relapse, during the first 2 years and attempts to improve on R-CHOP regimen have not been successful. Maintenance treatment strategy following R-CHOP, to better control the disease, delay disease progression and improve long term survival, have included Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, maintenance treatment with agents such as oral protein kinase inhibitor Enzastaurin and Everolimus. Outcomes for transplant-ineligible patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL patients remain poor.

CD79b is a B-cell specific surface protein, which is a component of the B-cell receptor and is ubiquitously expressed on the surface of malignant B cells. POLIVY® (Polatuzumab vedotin) is a CD79b-directed Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) with activity against dividing B cells. It consists of three components: 1) the humanized ImmunoGlobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody specific for human CD79b; 2) the small molecule anti-mitotic agent MMAE (monomethyl auristatin E) and 3) a protease-cleavable linker that covalently attaches MMAE to the Polatuzumab antibody. Upon binding to CD79b, POLIVY® is internalized, and the linker is cleaved by lysosomal proteases thus enabling intracellular delivery of MMAE. MMAE then binds to microtubules and kills dividing cells by inhibiting cell division and inducing apoptosis. POLIVY® demonstrated efficacy in patients with Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL, resulting in significantly longer Overall Survival when combined with Bendamustine and Rituximab, compared to Bendamustine and Rituximab alone. Based on these finding, the FDA granted accelerated approval to POLIVY® in June 2019.

In a Phase Ib-II study POLIVY® in combination with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (pola-R-CHP) resulted in a 89% Overall Response rate and 77% Complete Responses when given as first line therapy, in patients with DLBCL. In this study, Vincristine was excluded from the regimen owing to the risk of overlapping neurotoxicities with POLIVY®. The present POLARIX trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pola-R-CHP as compared with R-CHOP, in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

The POLARIX is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, International Phase III trial in which a total of 879 treatment naïve, CD20-positive, intermediate or high-risk DLBCL patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 6 cycles of either pola-R-CHP (N=440) or R-CHOP (N=439). Patients on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle, received POLIVY® 1.8 mg/kg IV and a placebo matching Vincristine IV (pola-R-CHP group) or a placebo matching POLIVY® and intravenous Vincristine at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum of 2 mg) (R-CHOP group), along with Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV, Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV and Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV. All the patients also received Prednisone 100 mg orally once daily on Days 1-5 of each of the first six cycles. During cycles 7 and 8, patients in both treatment groups received Rituximab monotherapy at 375 mg/m2 IV. The median patient age was 65 years and stratification was based on IPI score and presence or absence of bulky disease, Subtypes of DLBCL were centrally evaluated and were balanced between the two treatment groups. Patients were eligible regardless of the Cell of Origin or the presence of rearrangements in MYC, BCL2, BCL6, or a combination of these. Approximately 84% of patients had de novo DLBCL, NOS and 11% had high grade B-Cell Lymphoma. Patients with known CNS involvement were excluded but CNS prophylaxis with intrathecal chemotherapy was permitted, in accordance with institutional practice guidelines. The use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) was required during the first six cycles of treatment for primary prophylaxis against neutropenia, and consolidative radiotherapy to initial sites of bulky disease or extranodal sites was allowed at the discretion of the investigator. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS) and Safety.

At a median follow up of 28.2 months, the PFS was significantly higher in the pola-R-CHP group compared to the R-CHOP group. The PFS at 2 years was 76.7% in the pola-R-CHP group versus 70.2% in the R-CHOP group (stratified HR=0.73; P=0.02). Treatment with pola-R-CHP resulted in a risk of disease progression, relapse, or death that was 27% lower, compared to R-CHOP. Patient subgroups that did not show a clear benefit with pola-R-CHP included patients 60 years of age or younger, patients with the Germinal Center B-cell-like subtype of DLBCL, patients who had bulky disease, and patients who had lower IPI scores. Overall Survival at 2 years did not differ significantly between the treatment groups and the researchers attributed the lack of a significant difference between the two groups in Overall Survival, to the availability of new, effective treatments for relapsed or refractory DLBCL, as well as short duration of follow up at the time of this reporting. The safety profile was similar in the two treatment groups.

The authors concluded that among patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk DLBCL, the risk of disease progression, relapse, or death was lower among those who received pola-R-CHP than among those who received R-CHOP.

Polatuzumab Vedotin in Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Sehn LH, et al. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:351-363.

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Improves Overall Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Bile Tract cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) is a rare and highly aggressive heterogenous cancer, and is the second most common type of primary liver cancer after Hepatocellular carcinoma. It comprises about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. It is estimated that approximately 211,000 patients are diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer and 174,000 patients will die of the disease each year globally. Biliary Tract cancer is most frequently diagnosed in patients between 50 to 70 years old, and 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Klatskin tumor is a type of Cholangiocarcinoma that begins in the hilum, at the junction of the left and right bile ducts. It is the most common type of Cholangiocarcinoma, accounting for more than half of all cases. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma each year and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection. Patients diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer have a very poor prognosis, and the 5-year survival among those with advanced stage disease is less than 10%, with limited progress made over the past two decades. There is therefore an urgent unmet need for new effective therapies.

Patients with advanced Biliary Tract cancers often receive chemotherapy in the first and second line settings, with limited benefit. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination is currently the first line standard-of-care treatment. With the recognition of immunogenic features displayed by Biliary Tract cancers, the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for improving disease control and prolonging survival has been increasingly explored.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

KEYNOTE-966 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, conducted to determine whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab to first line standard chemotherapy, would impact survival outcomes in patients with metastatic or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers. In this study, 1069 patients (N=1069) with advanced and/or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers were randomly assigned to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (N=533) or placebo (N=536). Both treatment groups received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks without preset maximum number of cycles, and Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles. The median age was 63.5 years, majority of patients had metastatic disease (88%) and more than half had intrahepatic disease. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response and Safety. The median follow up was 25.6 months.

The median OS was 12.7 months in the Pembrolizumab group and 10.9 months in the placebo group (HR=0.83; P=0.0034). This represented a 17% reduction in the risk of death in the Pembrolizumab group compared to the placebo group. The 12-month OS rate was 52% with the Pembrolizumab regimen versus 44% for chemotherapy alone and the 24-month OS rates were 24.9% versus 18.1%, respectively. The OS results were generally consistent across subgroups.

There was no significant difference in PFS between the treatment groups but there was a trend toward improved PFS with Pembrolizumab. The median PFS was 6.5 months in the Pembrolizumab arm and 5.6 months in the placebo group (HR=0.87; P=0.23). The estimated 12-month PFS was 25% and 20% respectively.The Objective Response Rates were similar between the two treatment groups – 28.7% in the Pembrolizumab group and 28.5% in the placebo arm.The safety profile of Pembrolizumab was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies and Grade 3-4 adverse events were similar between treatment groups.

The authors concluded that KEYNOTE-966 is the largest randomized Phase III trial in advanced Biliary Tract cancers to date, with more patients enrolled from non-Asian countries. First line treatment with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved Overall Survival, when compared with chemotherapy alone. The researchers added that one of the limitations of this study is that patients with intrahepatic bile duct cancers were overrepresented in the study population compared with the incidence of the disease in the general population, resulting in smaller sample sizes of patients with extrahepatic and gall bladder sites of origin.

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al. Lancet. Published online April 16, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4.