SUMMARY: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is one of the hard-to-treat cancers for which chemotherapy has not demonstrated any survival benefit – that is, until now. In a recently presented randomized phase III trial at the ASCO 2010 meeting, 250 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were assigned to receive either single agent Gemcitabine (GEMZAR®) or a combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, Irinotecan (CAMPTOSAR®) , and Oxaliplatin (ELOXATIN®) – (FOLFIRINOX regimen). Following an interim analysis, this trial had to be closed earlier than planned, based on the significantly positive results noted with the combination regimen. The median overall survival for patients in the FOLFIRINOX was 11.1 months compared with 6.8 months for those receiving single agent GEMZAR®. At one year, 48% of patients in the FOLFIRINOX group were alive compared to 20% for those in the GEMZAR® group. The median progression free survival was 6.4 months for the patients treated with FOLFIRINOX compared to 3.3 months for those treated with single agent GEMZAR®. Quality of life was also superior in the FOLFIRINOX group compared to those who were treated with GEMZAR®. For the very first time, we now have a combination chemotherapy regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer that confers survival benefit. J Clin Oncol 28:303s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 4010)
Author: RR
Phase III trial of bevacizumab (BEV) in the primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC) A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
SUMMARY: The role of Bevacizumab (AVASTIN®) in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer was evaluated in a large randomized double blind phase III trial. One thousand eight hundred and seventy three (1873) patients with stage III or IV disease, who were treatment naïve, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups – standard chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin given along with a placebo followed maintenance treatment with a placebo, standard chemotherapy given along with AVASTIN® followed by maintenance treatment with a placebo or standard chemotherapy given along with AVASTIN® followed by maintenance treatment with AVASTIN®. Patients receiving standard chemotherapy along with AVASTIN® followed by maintenance AVASTIN® had a median Progression Free Survival of 14.1 months compared to 10.3 months for those who received standard chemotherapy alone. Interestingly, outcomes in patients receiving standard chemotherapy along with AVASTIN® followed by placebo maintenance did no better than those who received standard chemotherapy alone. To date, addition of AVASTIN® to standard chemotherapy followed by AVASTIN® maintenance has not resulted in significant improvement in overall survival. J Clin Oncol 28:18s, 2010 (suppl; abstr LBA1)
Nilotinib versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
SUMMARY: ENESTnd (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients) is a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of Nilotinib (TASIGNA®), either 300 mg or 400 mg bid with GLEEVEC® (Imatinib) 400mg qd, in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML in chronic phase. Of the 846 patients enrolled, 282 patients received TASIGNA® 300 mg bid, 281 patients received TASIGNA® 400 mg bid and 283 patients received GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd. With a median follow up of 18 months, the MMR (Major Molecular Response) was 66% for the TASIGNA® 300 mg bid group and 62% for the TASIGNA® 400 mg bid group compared with 40% for the GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd group. The median time to MMR amongst the patients who achieved MMR was faster for TASIGNA® 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and TASIGNA® 400 mg bid (5.8 months) groups of patients compared with GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd (8.3 months). The rates of complete cytogenetic response at 18 months were also significantly higher for both TASIGNA® groups – 85% in the TASIGNA® 300 mg bid group, 82% in the TASIGNA® 400 mg bid group and 74% in the GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd group. Fewer patients in the TASIGNA® groups progressed to accelerated phase or blast crises compared with GLEEVEC® group. Adverse effects more often seen with TASIGNA® included skin rash, headache, liver function abnormalities, high cholesterol, hyperglycemia, increased serum lipase, abnormal electrolyte levels and prolongation of the QT interval. The authors concluded that TASIGNA® at both 300 mg bid and 400 mg bid induced significantly higher and faster rates of MMR and complete cytogenetic remission compared with GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd. J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 6501)
Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment a randomised open-label trial
SUMMARY: The TROPIC trial (Treatment of Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a docetaxel (TAXOTERE®)- Containing Regimen) involved 755 men in 26 countries with metastatic prostate cancer who were castration resistant. Patients were randomized to receive either Cabazitaxel (JEVTANA®) 25 mg/m2 or Mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 three times a week and both groups received prednisone 10 mg daily through out the course of their treatment. The combination of JEVTANA® and prednisone resulted in median overall survival of 15.1 months compared to 12.7 months for the Mitoxantrone group. There was a 30% reduction in the risk of death for the JEVTANA® group. This led to the approval of JEVTANA® for the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer, previously treated with a TAXOTERE® containing regimen. Lancet 2010;376:1147-1154
Results of a randomized, phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) and carboplatin (C) compared with cremophor-based paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
SUMMARY: In this randomized phase III trial, the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®) and carboplatin was compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced NSCLC of all histologic types. Patients enrolled were chemonaïve, with stage IIIb and stage IV non small cell lung cancer. Five hundred and twenty one (521) received ABRAXANE® without any premedications at 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 along with carboplatin given on day 1 at an AUC of 6. The control group of 525 patients received standard Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 on day 1. The primary end point was overall response rate. The ABRAXANE® group had a response rate of 33% compared to 25% for the standard paclitaxel group. When broken down by histology, the response rates in those with squamous cell carcinoma was 41% in the ABRAXANE® group versus 24% in the standard paclitaxel arm and the non squamous subtypes had a response rate of 26% versus 25% in the ABRAXANE® and paclitaxel group respectively. It is hypothesized that the superior response rates in squamous cell histology may be due to the overexpression by this sub type of an albumin receptor called Caveolin–1. ABRAXANE® which is an albumin bound paclitaxel utilizes the albumin receptor Caveolin-1 (CAV1) pathway and thereby may achieve a higher intratumoral drug concentration. J Clin Oncol 28:18s, 2010 (suppl; abstr LBA7511)
New Biomarker to predict Cancer Recurrence or Metastasis
A protein variant of carboxypeptidase E has now been shown to induce tumor growth and metastases. By measuring the level of this protein in the tumor and surrounding tissue, we may soon be able to predict whether a tumor is likely to spread or has already spread. The predictability of tumor behavior, using this new novel biomarker, appears to trump the outcomes based on staging and grade of the tumor. The tempo of the disease even in patients with advanced cancer can be predicted measuring the levels of this biomarker, with tumors expressing high levels of this protein doing poorly. This may also help the clinician determine when to treat a patient with cancer and when to just monitor without pursuing aggressive chemotherapeutic intervention.
These findings were published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, Feb 2011.
Environment and Cancer
More than a third of Americans will develop some form of cancer during their life time. Interestingly 80-90% of the cancers in the western hemisphere has been attributed to environmental factors. With cancer being the second common cause of mortality in the USA, prevention of cancer related morbidity and mortality can be accomplished by avoiding environmental pollution with carcinogens and eliminating exposure to existing carcinogenic agents in the environment. This sentiment was eloquently verbalized by Dr. David Christiani in the March 3, 2011 issue of the NEJM.
Despite the progress made in cancer treatment and Genomics, we cannot lose sight of the fact that prevention is better than cure.
Breast Cancer – More is not necessarily better
It used to be that patients with breast cancer requiring surgery had Radical Mastectomy until the 1970’s. It subsequently became clear that Modified Radical Mastectomy, a less aggressive surgical procedure was just as effective as Radical Mastectomy. The next major surgical advance in Breast Cancer was breast preservation with Lumpectomy, Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) and Radiation. This has been proven to be as good as Modified Radical Mastectomy. Because of the morbidity associated with complete ALND, the technique of Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) was developed and it became clear that SLND by itself is as effective as ALND, in early breast cancer, without the complications associated with ALND.
A randomized clinical trial results published in JAMA this month demonstrated that in women with invasive breast cancer and limited sentinel lymph node metastases, SLND was as effective as ALND. With this data, women diagnosed with breast cancer hopefully will not have to endure the morbidity associated with ALND which include swelling, pain, paresthesias and restriction of movement of the arm.
This philosophy of ” more is not better” with regards to chemotherapy, held ground, after myeloablative therapy and transplantation for metastatic breast cancer patients showed no benefit. Hopefully newer “kinder and gentler” systemic agents will follow suit, just as the surgical techniques have evolved over the past 40 years.
Maintenance Rituximab
The FDA on Jan 31, 2011 approved Rituximab as a maintenance treatment for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma, who responded to initial treatment with Rituximab plus chemotherapy. Follicular lymphomas are a subset of Non Hodgkins Lymphomas and are very responsive to chemotherapy or chemotherapy with Rituximab. They are usually incurable however, despite treatment with Rituximab plus chemotherapy. So think of this condition as a chronic disease. For this reason, prolonging remission duration is important, as the length of remission tends to be shorter with each recurrence.
In the PRIMA trial, which was a phase III study, maintenance Rituximab for 2 years given to those who responded to induction treatment with chemotherapy and Rituximab, delayed the risk of recurrence and improved progression free survival. These findings are relevant for patients who essentially have a chronic disease and are willing to pursue interventions that would delay recurrence of their lymphoma and therefore improve their quality of lives.
PARP Inhibition in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Patients with triple negative breast cancer have inherent defects in several DNA repair pathways. These cancer cells therefore become increasing dependent on another DNA damage repair pathway called base excision repair (BER) pathway, for survival. It so happens that PARP 1(PolyAdenosine diphosphate Ribose Polymerase) is an important enzyme regulating the BER pathway. By inhibiting PARP1, the BER pathway is inhibited leading to extreme levels of DNA damage and eventual death of cancer cells.
In an article published in the Jan 20,2011 issue of the NEJM, the addition of a PARP inhibitor Iniparib to a combination of Carboplatin and Gemzar in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer, resulted in superior Response Rates, median Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival. This difficult -to -treat subtype of breast cancer may soon become extinct.