The FDA on August 11, 2022, granted accelerated approval to ENHERTU® (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have activating human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 HER2 (ERBB2) mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test, and who have received a prior systemic therapy. This is the first drug approved for HER2-mutant NSCLC. ENHERTU® is a product of Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Author: RR
TABRECTA® (Capmatinib)
The FDA on August 10, 2022, granted regular approval to TABRECTA® (Capmatinib) for adult patients with metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have a mutation leading to Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET) exon 14 skipping, as detected by an FDA-approved test. TABRECTA® is a product of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Long Term Lung Cancer Survival Rates with Low Dose CT Screening
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.
In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) with Low Dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer, there was a 20% reduction in mortality. Following the publication of the results of NLST, the NCCN issued guideline in 2011, and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended lung cancer screening with Low Dose CT scan in high-risk patients. The CMS in 2015 determined that there was sufficient evidence to reimburse for this preventive service. The USPSTF expanded the criteria for lung cancer screening in 2021 and recommended annual screening with Low-Dose CT for adults aged 50-80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.
Approximately 15% of patients present with early stage (T1-2 N0) disease, and these numbers are likely to increase with the implementation of lung cancer screening programs. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC who present with early Stage (I–IIIA) disease. Despite the favorable stage shift as a result of lung cancer screening, low Health Care Provider knowledge of the lung cancer screening guidelines represents a potential barrier to implementation.
The Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP) in 1992 initiated a study of the early diagnosis of lung cancer in cigarette smokers using annual spiral CT screening. This study showed that more than 80% of individuals diagnosed with lung cancer as a result of annual CT screening had clinical Stage I cancer (Lancet 1999;354:99-105). In a subsequent large collaborative study (International Early Lung Cancer Action Program-IELCAP), 31,567 asymptomatic individuals at risk for lung cancer were screened with Low-Dose CT from 1993 through 2005. This study suggested that for those participants with Stage I lung cancer, the estimated 10-year survival rate was 88%, and among those with clinical Stage I lung cancer who underwent surgical resection within 1 month after the diagnosis, the survival rate was 92%. This study provided strong evidence that annual spiral CT screening can detect lung cancer that is curable (N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1763-1771).
The researchers herein provided the 20-year lung cancer-specific survival of participants, IELCAP enrolled, since its start in 1992. This prospective, international, multicenter study enrolled 87,416 participants, current, former and never smokers, 40 years of age and older, as of December 31, 2021. Participants were screened for lung cancer using Low-Dose CT for early detection of lung cancer with particular attention to lung cancer manifesting on CT images as solid, part solid and nonsolid consistency.
The 20-year lung cancer-specific survival for patients who underwent CT screenings and were diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer was 80%. The lung cancer-specific survival for patients with nonsolid and part-solid consistency cancerous lung nodules who underwent CT screenings was 100%, and 73% for patients with solid nodules. The lung cancer-specific survival for clinical Stage IA participants was 86%, regardless of consistency. For participants with pathologic Stage IA lung cancers 10 mm or less in average diameter, the 20-year lung cancer-specific survival was 92%.
The researchers concluded that after 20 years, their previous estimates of lung cancer survival rates are now confirmed, and this study adds further evidence of the high curability of lung cancer diagnosed by CT screening. These data demonstrate the importance of routine and early lung cancer screening.
20-year Lung Cancer Survival Rates in the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (IELCAP). Henschke C, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, et al. Presented at: Radiological Society of North America; November 27-December 1, 2022; Chicago, IL.
FDA Approves REZLIDHIA® for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
SUMMARY: The FDA on December 1, 2022, approved REZLIDHIA® (Olutasidenib) capsules for adult patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with a susceptible IDH1 mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test. The FDA on the same day also approved the Abbott RealTime IDH1 Assay to select patients for REZLIDHIA®.
The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 20,050 new cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) will be diagnosed in the United States and 11,540 patients will die of the disease. AML can be considered as a group of heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior and outcomes. Cytogenetic analysis has been part of routine evaluation when caring for patients with AML. By predicting resistance to therapy, tumor cytogenetics will stratify patients, based on risk and help manage them accordingly. Even though cytotoxic chemotherapy may lead to long term remission and cure in a minority of patients with favorable cytogenetics, patients with high risk features such as unfavorable cytogenetics, molecular abnormalities, prior Myelodysplasia and advanced age, have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy alone. AML mainly affects older adults and the median age at diagnosis is 68 years. A significant majority of patients with AML are unable to receive intensive induction chemotherapy due to comorbidities and therefore receive less intensive, noncurative regimens, with poor outcomes.
Isocitrate DeHydrogenase (IDH) is a metabolic enzyme that helps generate energy from glucose and other metabolites, by catalyzing the conversion of Isocitrate to Alpha-Ketoglutarate. Alpha-ketoglutarate is required to properly regulate DNA and histone methylation, which in turn is important for gene expression and cellular differentiation. IDH mutations lead to aberrant DNA methylation and altered gene expression, thereby preventing cellular differentiation, with resulting immature undifferentiated cells. IDH mutations can thus promote leukemogenesis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and tumorigenesis in solid tumors and can result in inferior outcomes. There are three isoforms of IDH. IDH1 is mainly found in the cytoplasm, as well as in peroxisomes, whereas IDH2 and IDH3 are found in the mitochondria, and are a part of the Krebs cycle.
Approximately 20-25% of patients with AML, 70% of patients with Low-grade Glioma and secondary Glioblastoma, 50% of patients with Chondrosarcoma, 20% of patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, 30% of patients with Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma and 8% of patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes/Myeloproliferative neoplasms, are associated with IDH mutations. IDH2 mutations are more common than IDH1 mutations, occurring in approximately 15% to 20% of patients with AML. The presence of IDH mutations has both prognostic and predictive value. Patients with an IDH mutation and a Nucleo¬phosmin (NPM1) mutation usually have a better prognosis whereas patients with mutations in IDH and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) do not. Further IDH mutations predict response to specific IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors in the Relapsed and Refractory setting. The presence of an IDH mutation is therefore not only prognostic, but also predictive of response to certain therapies.
The two IDH inhibitors presently available in the US include IDHIFA® (Enasidenib), approved for the treatment of patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML with IDH2 mutation and TIBSOVO® (Ivosidenib), approved for AML patients with the IDH1 mutation who have Relapsed/Refractory disease, as well as monotherapy for newly diagnosed AML patients 75 years or older with comorbidities that preclude the use of intensive induction chemotherapy. IDHIFA® can be associated with indirect hyperbilirubinemia, which is of no clinical consequence, whereas with TIBSOVO® there is a small risk of QT interval prolongation. Both agents can lead to Differentiation Syndrome in 10-15% of patients which requires systemic steroids and hemodynamic monitoring for at least 3 days.
REZLIDHIA® is a potent, selective, oral, brain-penetrant, small molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1, that has exhibited favorable tolerability and clinical activity in high-risk AML patients in a Phase 1 trial (Watts JM, et al. Blood 2019). The present FDA approval was based on the Phase 1/2 Study 2102-HEM-101 trial (NCT02719574), which included 147 adult patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML with an IDH1 mutation, confirmed using the above now approved assay. Enrolled patients had pathologically proven AML, except those with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia with the t(15;17) translocation, or intermediate high, or very high-risk MDS as defined by the WHO criteria or Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. REZLIDHIA® 150 mg was given orally, twice daily, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. The median treatment duration was 4.7 months. Sixteen (11%) patients underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation following treatment with REZLIDHIA®. The Primary end points included the rate of Complete Remission (CR) plus Complete Remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). Secondary end points included time to response, Duration of Response, Event-Free Survival, Overall Survival, and Relapse-Free Survival.
The Complete Remission plus Complete Remission with partial hematologic recovery rate with REZLIDHIA® was 35%, with 32% CR and 2.7% CRh. The median time to CR+CRh was 1.9 months and the median duration of CR+CRh was 25.9 months. Among the 86 patients who were Red Blood Cell (RBC) and/or platelet transfusions dependent at baseline, 34% became RBC and platelet transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period. Of the 61 patients who were RBC and platelet transfusions independent at baseline, 64% remained transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period. The most common adverse reactions were nausea, diarrhea, constipation, mucositis, fatigue/malaise, arthralgia, fever, rash, leukocytosis, dyspnea, and transaminitis. Health care professionals and patients should be aware of the risk of Differentiation Syndrome, which can be fatal.
REZLIDHIA® is the third IDH inhibitor currently approved for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-olutasidenib-relapsed-or-refractory-acute-myeloid-leukemia-susceptible-idh1-mutation.
FDA Approves Biomarker-Driven ELAHERE® for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
SUMMARY: The FDA on November 14, 2022, granted accelerated approval to ELAHERE® (mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx) for adult patients with Folate Receptor alpha (FR alpha) positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who have received one to three prior systemic treatment regimens. The FDA also on the same day approved the VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR-2.1) RxDx Assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), as a companion diagnostic device to select patients for the above indication.
It is estimated that in the United States, approximately 19,880 women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2022, and 12,810 women will die of the disease. Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women, and accounts for more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. Approximately 75% of the ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Approximately 85% of all ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin, and approximately 70% of all epithelial ovarian cancers are High-Grade Serous adenocarcinomas. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy following primary surgical cytoreduction. Approximately 70% of these patients will relapse within the subsequent 3 years and are incurable, with a 5-year Overall Survival rate of about 20-30%. Treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer are limited, and patients are often treated with single-agent chemotherapy, with an Overall Response Rate of between 4% and 13%, short duration of response, and significant toxicities.
Approximately 35-40% of ovarian cancer patients express high levels of Folate Receptor alpha, and this expression correlates with advanced stages of disease and more malignant phenotypes. There is limited expression of Folate Receptor alpha in normal tissues and is limited to the choroid plexus, proximal renal tubules, placenta, and endometrium. Testing for Folate Receptor alpha can be performed on fresh or archived tissue.
ELAHERE® (mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx) is a first-in-class Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), directed against FR alpha, a cell-surface protein highly expressed in ovarian cancer. It is comprised of a Folate Receptor alpha-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid payload DM4, which is a potent tubulin inhibitor, disrupting microtubule formation, and thereby designed to kill the targeted cancer cells. Microtubules are major components of the cytoskeleton that give shape and structure to cells. ELAHERE® is the first FDA approved ADC for platinum-resistant disease.
The FDA approval was based on the pivotal SORAYA trial, which is a single-arm study in 106 patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, whose tumors expressed high levels of Folate Receptor alpha, and who had been treated with 1-3 prior lines of systemic treatment regimens. All patients were required to have received prior treatment with AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab). Enrolled patient’s tumors were positive for FR alpha expression as determined by the above-mentioned FDA approved assay. Patients were eligible for the study if at least 75% of cells had 2+ staining intensity or greater, based on immunohistochemistry-based scoring. Patients were excluded if they had corneal disorders, ocular conditions requiring ongoing treatment, more than Grade 1 peripheral neuropathy, or noninfectious interstitial lung disease. Patients received ELAHERE® 6 mg/kg (based on adjusted ideal body weight) IV infusion every three weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Assessments were made for tumor response every six weeks for the first 36 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed Overall Response Rate (ORR), and key Secondary endpoint was Duration of Response (DOR).
The confirmed ORR was 31.7% including five Complete Responses, and the median Duration of Response was 6.9 months. Response rates were consistently seen regardless of the number of prior therapies or the use of a prior PARP inhibitor. The most common adverse reactions including laboratory abnormalities, were vision impairment, keratopathy, fatigue, nausea, peripheral neuropathy, increase in ALT and AST and cytopenias. Product labeling includes a boxed warning for ocular toxicity. The authors reported that the ocular events were reversible and primarily included low-grade blurred vision and keratopathy, which were managed with protocol-defined dose modifications. Approximately 60% of patients with symptoms had resolution prior to their next cycle of treatment, and less than 1% of patients discontinued therapy due to an ocular event.
It was concluded that ELAHERE® had impressive anti-tumor activity, durability of response, and overall tolerability, and may be a new therapeutic option for patients with Folate Receptor alpha-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Efficacy and safety of mirvetuximab soravtansine in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with high folate receptor alpha expression: Results from the SORAYA study. Matulonis UA, Lorusso D, Oaknin A, et al: 2022 SGO Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Abstract 242. Presented March 19, 2022.
XTANDI® Monotherapy versus Active Surveillance in Patients with Low-risk or Intermediate-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 268,490 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2022, and 34,500 men will die of the disease.
Approximately 70% of patients with a new diagnosis of prostate cancer have localized disease. Active Surveillance (AS) is a recommended management option according to the NCCN treatment guidelines, for patients with clinically localized very low-risk, low-risk, or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Eligible Active Surveillance patients who opt for definitive therapy, such as radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or brachytherapy, may experience adverse effects, including sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence. The addition of Dutasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor as an adjunct to Active Surveillance significantly reduced the risk of progression by 38% in the REDEEM trial, among men with low-risk prostate cancer. Additional systemic therapies are however needed to reduce the risk of disease progression in this patient group.
The development and progression of prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced Prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention. Androgen Deprivation Therapies have included bilateral orchiectomy or Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues, with or without first generation Androgen Receptor (AR) inhibitors such as CASODEX® (Bicalutamide), NILANDRON® (Nilutamide) and EULEXIN® (Flutamide) or with second-generation, anti-androgen agents, which include ZYTIGA® (Abiraterone), XTANDI® (Enzalutamide), ERLEADA® (Apalutamide) and NUBEQA® (Darolutamide). Enzalutamide is a potent oral androgen receptor inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in patients with both localized and advanced prostate cancer.
The ENACT study is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase II exploratory clinical trial, conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with Enzalutamide monotherapy plus Active Surveillance, versus Active Surveillance alone, in patients with clinically localized low-risk or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In this study a total of 227 eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 1 year of treatment with Enzalutamide 160 mg orally daily plus Active Surveillance (N=114), or Active Surveillance alone (N=113). Enrolled patients had a diagnosis of histologically proven low-risk or intermediate-risk (defined per National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines) clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (with 10 or more core biopsies) within 6 months of screening. Patients with very low-risk disease (T1c, PSA less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason score of 6 or less; less than 3 cancer-positive cores, 50% or less cancer in any core, and a PSA density of less than 0.15 ng/mL/g) were not eligible. The mean age was 66 years and baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups. Patients were monitored during 1 year of treatment and up to 2 years of follow up. The Primary end point was time to pathological or therapeutic prostate cancer progression. Pathological progression was defined as an increase in primary or secondary Gleason pattern by 1 or more, or a higher proportion of cancer-positive cores (15% or more increase). Therapeutic progression was defined as the earliest occurrence of primary therapy such as prostatectomy, radiation, focal therapy, or any systemic therapy for prostate cancer. Incidence of pathological or therapeutic prostate cancer progression at 1 and 2 years was also assessed. Secondary end points included incidence of negative biopsy results, percentage of cancer-positive cores and incidence of a secondary rise in serum PSA levels at 1 and 2 years, as well as time to PSA progression. Median follow up was 492 days for patients receiving Enzalutamide and 270 for patients undergoing Active Surveillance. The median Enzalutamide treatment duration was 352 days.
Treatment with Enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression by 46% versus Active Surveillance (HR=0.54; P=0.02). The odds of a negative biopsy result at 1 year were significantly increased and were 3.5 times higher with Enzalutamide treatment versus Active Surveillance (Odds Ratio=3.5; P<0.001). There was a significant reduction in the percentage of cancer-positive cores, and the odds of a secondary rise in serum PSA levels at 1 year with Enzalutamide treatment, although no significant difference was observed at 2 years. Treatment with Enzalutamide also significantly delayed PSA progression by 6 months vs Active Surveillance (HR=0.71; P=0.03). The most reported adverse events during Enzalutamide treatment were fatigue (55.4%) and gynecomastia (36.6%). Worsening of sexual and physical function resolved by month 24 after treatment cessation.
In a follow up analysis of the ENACT trial, the researchers were able to demonstrate that RNA biomarkers PAM50 (Luminal versus Basal subtypes), Androgen Receptor Activation, and Decipher score were of prognostic value. Higher Decipher signature scores were associated with greater risk of disease progression, thereby providing a better understanding of who would be a better candidate for Active Surveillance versus who would benefit from treatment intervention (Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S616-S652. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1070).
It was concluded that Enzalutamide monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated a significant treatment response in patients with low-risk or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. The authors added that ENACT trial represents the first study to compare the effects of a novel Androgen Receptor antagonist as monotherapy vs Active Surveillance, in patients with low-risk or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer, and the results suggest that Enzalutamide may offer an alternative short-term treatment option for this patient population, potentially reducing the need for more aggressive treatment approaches.
Enzalutamide Monotherapy vs Active Surveillance in Patients with Low-risk or Intermediate-risk Localized Prostate Cancer. The ENACT Randomized Clinical Trial. Shore ND, Renzulli J, Fleshner NE, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(8):1128-1136. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1641.
FDA Approves LIBTAYO® in Combination with Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
SUMMARY: The FDA on November 8, 2022, approved LIBTAYO® (Cemiplimab-rwlc) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for adult patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.
Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the T cells of the immune system. Immuno-Oncology (IO) therapies unleash the T cells by blocking the Immune checkpoint proteins, thereby resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. Immunotherapy with PD-1 (Programmed cell Death 1) and PD-L1 (Programmed cell Death Ligand 1) inhibitors have demonstrated a clear survival benefit both as a single agent or in combination, compared with standard chemotherapy, in both treatment-naive and previously treated patients for advanced NSCLC. It is now standard therapy for patients with lung cancer.
KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab; anti PD-1) and TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab; anti PD-L1) are both approved in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC. The FDA approval of TECENTRIQ® with platinum-doublet chemotherapy is however limited to non-squamous histology.
LIBTAYO® is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1. LIBTAYO® monotherapy was approved by the FDA in 2021 after it demonstrated significantly improved Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival compared with chemotherapy, in patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%. The researchers in EMPOWER-Lung 3 evaluated the efficacy of first line LIBTAYO® in combination with investigator’s choice of platinum-doublet chemotherapy, among patients with advanced NSCLC, with either squamous or non-squamous histology, and any level of PD-L1 expression.
EMPOWER-Lung 3 is a randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, active-controlled Phase III trial in which 466 patients with advanced NSCLC who had not received prior systemic treatment were randomized (2:1) to receive either Cemiplimab 350 mg IV once every 3 weeks (N=312) or placebo (N=154) every 3 weeks, in combination with four cycles of chemotherapy. Investigators’ choice of histology-specific chemotherapy options included Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin, Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin, Pemetrexed plus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed plus Cisplatin. Patients were treated for a maximum of 108 weeks, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For patients with non-squamous histology assigned to a Pemetrexed-containing regimen, maintenance Pemetrexed was mandatory. Patients were enrolled irrespective of PD-L1 expression or tumor histology and had advanced or metastatic NSCLC, with no ALK, EGFR or ROS1 aberrations. Among those enrolled, 43% had tumors with squamous histology, 67% had tumors with less than 50% PD-L1 expression, 15% had inoperable locally advanced disease not eligible for definitive chemoradiation, and 7% had pretreated and clinically stable brain metastases. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Response Rate (ORR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR).
The trial was stopped early upon recommendation by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) after the LIBTAYO® combination demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in Overall Survival, compared to placebo plus chemotherapy. The median OS was 21.9 months in the LIBTAYO® plus chemotherapy group and 13.0 months in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR=0.71; P=0.0140). This represented a 21% relative reduction in the risk of death in the LIBTAYO® plus chemotherapy group. The 12-month probability of survival was 66% for the LIBTAYO® combination versus 56% for chemotherapy.
The median PFS per BICR was 8.2 months in the LIBTAYO® plus chemotherapy group and 5.0 months in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR=0.56; p<0.0001). This represented a 44% reduction in the risk of disease progression in the LIBTAYO® plus chemotherapy group. The 12-month probability of PFS for the LIBTAYO® combination was 38%, versus 16% for chemotherapy. The confirmed ORR per BICR was 43% and 23% in the respective treatment groups and the median Duration of Response was 16 months versus 7 months respectively. The most common (15% or more) adverse reactions were alopecia, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and decreased appetite.
It was concluded that LIBTAYO® is only the second anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent to show efficacy in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer either as monotherapy in those with PD-L1 expression 50% or more, or in combination with chemotherapy, irrespective of PD-L1 expression or tumor histology.
Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Gogishvili M, Melkadze T, Makharadze T, et al. Nature Medicine 2022;(28):2374-2380.
TAFINLAR® and MEKINIST® versus OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® for Patients with Advanced BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 99,780 new cases of melanoma of the skin will be diagnosed in the United States and 7,650 people are expected to die of the disease. The rates of melanoma have been rising rapidly over the past few decades, but this has varied by age.
The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase pathway (MAPK pathway) is an important signaling pathway which enables the cell to respond to external stimuli. This pathway plays a dual role, regulating cytokine production and participating in cytokine dependent signaling cascade. The MAPK pathway of interest is the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. The RAF family of kinases includes ARAF, BRAF and CRAF signaling molecules. BRAF is a very important intermediary of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. BRAF mutations have been detected in 6-8% of all malignancies. The most common BRAF mutation in melanoma is at the V600E/K site and is detected in approximately 50% of melanomas, and results in constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway.
Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options by improving Overall Response Rate (ORR) and prolongation of survival across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell Death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system. Over 50% of patients treated with a combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors are alive after five years.
TAFINLAR® (Dabrafenib), is a selective oral BRAF inhibitor and MEKINIST® (Trametinib) is a potent and selective inhibitor of MEK gene, which is downstream from RAF in the MAPK pathway. TAFINLAR® plus MEKINIST® led to long-term survival benefit in approximately one third of the patients who had unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation, from two randomized Phase III COMBI-d and COMBI-v trials.
A combination of OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) plus YERVOY® (Ipilimumab) showed durable improved outcomes among patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and approximately 50% of patients were alive at 6.5 years (J Clin Oncol 39, 2021. suppl 15; abstr 9506). The FDA granted approval for this combination in 2015 for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, regardless of tumor BRAF mutation status.
It has been noted that BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy tends to produce high tumor response rates and prolonged median Progression Free Survival (PFS), whereas OPDIVO® /YERVOY® tends to have its major impact on Duration of Response. However, the optimal treatment sequence for patients with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, between combination OPDIVO®/YERVOY® checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and combination TAFINLAR® plus MEKINIST® molecularly targeted therapy, has remained unclear. Recently published tumor biology studies have suggested that resistance to BRAF/MEK-inhibitor therapy results in an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that is void of functional CD103+ dendritic cells, preventing effective antigen presentation to the immune system, and that immunotherapy may enhance BRAF-mutated melanoma responsiveness to targeted therapy.
DREAMseq (EA6134) is a two-arm, two-step, open-label, randomized Phase III trial, which investigated the anti PD-1/CLTA-4 immunotherapy combination of OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® followed by the anti-BRAF/MEK targeted therapy combination of TAFINLAR® plus MEKINIST®, versus the reverse sequence, in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. This study was conducted to determine which treatment sequence produced the best efficacy.
In this study, 265 patients with treatment-naive BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® (arm A=133) or TAFINLAR® plus MEKINIST® (arm B=132) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, TAFINLAR® plus MEKINIST® (arm C=27) or OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® (arm D=46). The two initial treatment arms were balanced and more patients on arm B had BRAF V600K-mutant tumors than those on arm A (25.2% versus 12.1%). The median patient age was 61 years and eligible patients had histologically confirmed, BRAF V600-mutant unresectable Stage III or IV melanoma with measurable disease. The Primary end point was 2-year Overall Survival (OS). Secondary end points included 3-year OS, Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, Progression Free Survival (PFS), crossover feasibility, and Safety.
The study was stopped early by the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because statistical significance was achieved for the Primary endpoint. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% and arm B was 51.5% (P=0.01). Step 1 Progression Free Survival favored arm A (P=0.054). The Objective Response Rates were arm A: 46%, arm B: 43%, arm C: 47.8%, and arm D: 29.6%. The median Duration of Response was not reached for arm A, and 12.7 months for arm B (P<0.001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients following documented disease progression. Grade 3 or more toxicities occurred with similar frequency between treatment groups and adverse events related to regimens were as expected.
It was concluded from this study that for patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma, the treatment sequence beginning with the immune checkpoint inhibitor combination of OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® resulted in superior Overall Survival and longer Duration of Response, compared with the treatment sequence beginning with TAFINLAR® plus MEKINIST®, and should therefore be the preferred treatment sequence for most of these patients.
Combination Dabrafenib and Trametinib Versus Combination Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Patients with Advanced BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA6134. Atkins MB, Lee SJ, Chmielowski B, et al. J Clin Oncol. Published online September 27, 2022. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01763
Association of Gut Microbiome with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Advanced Melanoma
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2022, there will be an estimated 1.92 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 609,360 cancer deaths in the United States. Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell Death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system. Over 50% of patients treated with a combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors are alive after five years. Nonetheless, less than 50% of the patients respond to single-agent ICI and a higher response to targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4 is associated with significant immune-related Adverse Events.
Biomarkers predicting responses to ICIs include Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Mismatch Repair (MMR) status, and Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Other biomarkers such as Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), TIL- Interferon-gamma, Neutrophil-to-ratio, and peripheral cytokines, have also been proposed as predictors of response. It has been postulated that concomitant medications during therapy with ICIs such as baseline steroid use as well as treatment with antibiotics may negate or lessen the efficacy of ICIs.
Preclinical studies have suggested that immune-based therapies for cancer may have a very complex interplay with the host’s microbiome and there may be a relationship between gut bacteria and immune response to cancer. The gut microbiome is unique in each individual, including identical twins. The crosstalk between microbiota in the gut and the immune system allows for the tolerance of commensal bacteria (normal microflora) and oral food antigens and at the same time enables the immune system to recognize and attack opportunistic bacteria. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors strongly rely on the influence of the host’s microbiome, and the gut microbial diversity enhances mucosal immunity, dendritic cell function, and antigen presentation. Broad-spectrum antibiotics can potentially alter the bacterial composition and diversity of our gut microbiota, by killing the good bacteria. It has been postulated that this may negate the benefits of immunotherapy and influence treatment outcomes. It should be noted however that the relationship between gut bacteria and immune response is influenced by several factors and may be partially cancer type specific and it is unlikely that the same microbiome features can reflect the uniqueness of the genetic and immune characteristics of each tumor.
Even though the composition of the gut microbiome has been associated with clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, there is a lack of consistency of results between the published studies, and there is limited consensus on the specific microbiome characteristics linked to the clinical benefits of ICIs. The Predicting Response to Immunotherapy for Melanona with Gut Microbiome and Metabolomics (PRIMM) studies are two separate prospective observational cohort studies that has been recruiting patients in the UK (PRIMM-UK) and the Netherlands (PRIMM-NL) since 2018. These cohorts of previously ICI-naive patients with advanced melanoma have provided extensive biosamples, including stool, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, before and during ICI treatment, with detailed clinical and dietary data collected at regular intervals longitudinally.
The authors therefore performed a meta-analysis on existing publicly available datasets to produce the largest study to date. In order to study the role of the gut microbiome in ICI response, the researchers recruited ICI-naive patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma from the PRIMM cohorts, as well as three additional cohorts of ICI-naive patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma, originating from Barcelona, Leeds and Manchester (N = 165), and performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing on a total of 165 stool microbiome samples collected before initiating ICI treatment. Shotgun sequencing is a laboratory technique for determining the DNA sequence of an organism’s genome. This dataset was integrated with 147 metagenomic samples from smaller publicly available datasets. This methodology provided the largest assessment of the potential of the gut microbiome as a biomarker of response to ICI, in addition to allowing for investigation of specific microbial species or functions associated with response. Patient demographics including age, gender, BMI, previous non-immunotherapy treatments, previous drug therapies such as antibiotics, Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) and steroids, as well as dietary patterns, were collected in these cohorts for the majority of patients, and were considered in the multivariate analysis.
The researchers used machine learning analysis to understand the association between gut microbiome and response to ICIs. This analysis confirmed the link between the microbiome and Overall Response Rates (ORRs), as well as Progression Free Survival (PFS) with ICIs. This analysis also revealed limited reproducibility of microbiome-based signatures across cohorts. A panel of species, including Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Roseburia spp. and Akkermansiamuciniphila were associated with responders, but no single species could be regarded as a fully reliable biomarker across studies. Based on these findings from this large set of real-world cohorts, the authors noted that the relationship between human gut microbiome and response to ICIs is more complex than previously understood, and extends beyond the presence or absence of different microbial species in responders and nonresponders.
It was concluded that future studies should include large samples and take into account the complex interplay of clinical factors with the gut microbiome over the treatment course. Until then, the authors recommend high-quality, diverse, whole-foods diet to optimize gut health, rather than consumption of commercial probiotics.
Cross-cohort gut microbiome associations with immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced melanoma. Lee KA, Thomas AM, Bolte LA, et al. Nat Med. 2022;28:535-544.
NUBEQA® Combination Improves Overall Survival in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer
SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 268,490 new cases of Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and 34,500 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of Prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced Prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention.
The first-generation NonSteroidal Anti-Androgen (NSAA) agents such as EULEXIN® (Flutamide), CASODEX® (Bicalutamide) and NILANDRON® (Nilutamide) act by binding to the Androgen Receptor (AR) and prevent the activation of the AR and subsequent up-regulation of androgen responsive genes. They may also accelerate the degradation of the AR. These agents have a range of pharmacologic activity from being pure anti-androgens to androgen agonists. CASODEX® is often prescribed along with GnRH (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone) agonists for metastatic disease, or as a single agent second line hormonal therapy for those who had progressed on LHRH agonists.
NUBEQA® (Darolutamide) is a potent second-generation Androgen Receptor (AR) inhibitor with a new chemical structure and has a high affinity to the AR. NUBEQA® does not cross the blood-brain barrier and for this reason has a favorable safety and tolerability profile in prespecified adverse events such as seizures, when compared with other second-generation AR inhibitors such as ERLEADA® (Apalutamide) and XTANDI® (Enzalutamide). It has been associated with increased Overall Survival (OS) among patients with non-metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) and has been approved by the FDA for this indication. Whether a combination of NUBEQA®, in combination with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), and Docetaxel would increase survival among patients with metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, is unknown.
ARASENS is an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of NUBEQA® (Darolutamide) added to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Docetaxel in patients with metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer. In this study, a total of 1306 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive NUBEQA® (N=651) or placebo (N=655), both in combination with ADT and Docetaxel. All the patients received ADT (either a Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone (LHRH} agonist or antagonist) or underwent Orchiectomy within 12 weeks before randomization and received six cycles of Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV given on Day 1 every 21 days, with Prednisone or Prednisolone. Patients received LHRH agonists along with a first-generation anti-androgen agent for at least 4 weeks before randomization to help prevent a tumor flare, and the anti-androgen agent was discontinued before randomization. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive either NUBEQA® 600 mg orally twice daily or matched placebo, and treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.
Eligible patients had biopsy proven prostate cancer with bone metastases and had to be candidates for ADT and Docetaxel. Patients with regional lymph node involvement only (N1, below the aortic bifurcation) or if they had received ADT more than 12 weeks before randomization, second-generation Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for prostate cancer before randomization, or radiotherapy within 2 weeks before randomization, were excluded. The median age was 67 years and both treatment groups were well balanced. All patients had metastatic disease at baseline, 78% of the patients had a Gleason score of 8 or greater, about 80% had bone metastases (Stage M1b) and 18% had visceral metastases (Stage M1c). The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS) and Secondary end points included were time to Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, time to pain progression, symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival and time to initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy, as well as Safety. The median follow up for Overall Survival was 43 months.
The median Overall Survival was not estimable in the NUBEQA® group versus 48.9 months in the placebo group. The addition of NUBEQA® to the combination with ADT and Docetaxel reduced the risk of death by 32%, compared to the placebo group (HR=0.68; P<0.001). This OS benefit was noted across most subgroups. Further, the significant OS benefit with the addition of NUBEQA® was observed, despite receipt of subsequent life-prolonging systemic therapies such as different Androgen-Receptor pathway inhibitors by 75.6% of patients in the placebo control group. The OS at 4 years was 62.7% in the NUBEQA® group and 50.4% in the placebo group.
With regard to Secondary endpoints, the addition of NUBEQA® to ADT and Docetaxel demonstrated consistent benefits. The time to development of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer was significantly longer in the NUBEQA® group (HR=0.36; P<0.001), the time to pain progression was also significantly longer in the NUBEQA® group (HR=0.79; P=0.01), as well as symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival (HR=0.61; P<0.001). Further, the time to the initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy was also significantly longer in the NUBEQA® group (HR=0.39; P<0.001). Adverse events were similar in the two groups.
The authors concluded that among patients with metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer, the addition of NUBEQA® to Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Docetaxel resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival, as well as improvement in key Secondary end points, with no increase in adverse events.
Darolutamide and Survival in Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Smith MR, Hussain Saad F, et al. for the ARASENS Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1132-1142.