Author: RR

Lung Cancer Screening with Low Dose CT Associated with Favorable Stage Shift and Improved Survival

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers and Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) with Low Dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer, there was a 20% reduction in mortality. Following the publication of the results of NLST, and NCCN issued guideline in 2011, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended Lung Cancer screening with Low Dose CT scan in high risk patients. The CMS in 2015 determined that there was sufficient evidence to reimburse for this preventive service. The USPSTF expanded the criteria for Lung Cancer screening in 2021 and recommended annual screening with Low-Dose CT for adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. The new USPSTF 2021 criteria were given a B recommendation, as there was additional research needed, to improve uptake of LDCT screening and to develop biomarkers to more accurately identify individuals, who would benefit from screening.

Approximately 15% of patients present with early stage (T1-2 N0) disease, and these numbers are likely to increase with the implementation of Lung Cancer screening programs. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC who present with early Stage (I–IIIA) disease. In spite of the favorable stage shift as a result of lung cancer screening, low Health Care Provider knowledge of the lung cancer screening guidelines represents a potential barrier to implementation, and no clinical trials have shown these favorable benefits in a real world setting.

The authors in this study evaluated whether the introduction of Low Dose CT screening in 2013 resulted in an increase in the percentage of Stage I NSCLC diagnosed among patients potentially eligible for screening, along with an increase in median all cause survival among these patients, and whether any effects on stage extend to the entire study population or only select population groups. The researchers analyzed data from two large comprehensive US cancer registries-the National Cancer Database and the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) program database using a quasi-experimental observational design. A total of 763 474 patients were identified for analysis in this study. They included those who were diagnosed as having NSCLC between 2010 and 2018 and who would have been eligible for screening by age criteria (age 55-79 years) and a comparator NSCLC patient cohort who would have been ineligible for screening (age 45-55). The authors then compared the rate of change in the percentage of patients with Stage I cancer at diagnosis between 2010 and 2018.

It was noted that among the screen eligible cohort of NSCLC patients, the percentage of patients with Stage I disease at diagnosis increased by 3.9% each year from 2014, following a minor change from 2010 to 2013. The rate of increase in Stage I diagnoses was more rapid in high lung cancer screening states. These findings however were not seen in the younger, screening ineligible patients. These results consistently noted across multiple analyses.

The median all cause survival of screening eligible patients aged 55-80 years increased at 11.9% per year from 2014 to 2018 (from 19.7 to 28.2 months). In multivariable adjusted analysis, the hazard of death decreased significantly faster after 2014 compared with before 2014 (P<0.001).

Disparities were however noted, and the benefits from this significant shift in the stage of the disease was not realized in racial or ethnic minority groups and those living in lower income or less educated regions. By 2018, Stage I NSCLC was the predominant diagnosis among non-Hispanic white people, whereas the economically deprived group of patients, were more likely to have Stage IV disease at diagnosis. Increases in the detection of early stage lung cancer in the US from 2014 to 2018 led to an estimated 10,100 averted deaths.

It was concluded from this study that although the adoption of lung cancer screening has been slow nationwide, this study indicated the beneficial effect of lung cancer screening and a recent stage shift toward Stage I NSCLC, with improved survival, following the introduction of lung cancer screening. This study also highlighted the disparities in the stage of lung cancer diagnosed between patient populations, reinforcing the need for equitable access to screening in the US.

Association of computed tomography screening with lung cancer stage shift and survival in the United States: quasi-experimental study. Potter AL, Rosenstein AL, Kiang MV, et al. BMJ 2022; 376 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069008 (Published 30 March 2022)

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) for the Adjuvant Treatment of High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma*

RR

*Urothelial carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection.
Written by: Terence Friedlander, MD
Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco

Content sponsored by: Bristol Myers Squibb
Dr Friedlander is a paid consultant for BMS and was compensated for his contribution in drafting this content.

Overview of High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma*
Currently, radical resection with or without perioperative therapy is the standard of care for treating high-risk urothelial carcinoma (UC).1* However, there is still a high chance of recurrence within 2 years of radical resection, with less favorable survival rates for the high-risk patient population.1 While neoadjuvant therapy has an established role in treating high-risk UC,* data are less clear regarding the role of adjuvant therapy.2 In a retrospective observational cohort study of patients 65 years or older with UC at high risk of recurrence after radical resection, including patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, median disease-free survival (mDFS) was determined to be 13.5 months.1 Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the neoadjuvant standard of care, but prior to 2021 there were no FDA-approved adjuvant therapy options.1-3 Studies have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy may delay recurrence and improve overall survival (OS), but these studies have not definitively shown a survival benefit, largely due to inadequate sample sizes.2 Additionally, approximately 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin-based treatment.1 As a result, there is a high unmet need for this difficult-to-treat population, and it is important for the urologist, oncologist, and patient to discuss and align on perioperative treatments at the time of diagnosis and early in the patient journey.1,2,4 Entering the adjuvant treatment landscape, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be an additional treatment option for HCPs to consider for their patients with high-risk UC.1,2*

Adjuvant OPDIVO in High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma*
OPDIVO is approved and indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with UC who are at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection, regardless of prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nodal involvement, or PD-L1 status.5 The approval is based on Checkmate 274, a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of adjuvant OPDIVO versus placebo.6 More information on the study design can be found in the images below. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment arms.6
Checkmate 274Important Safety Information
Select Important Safety Information
In Checkmate 274, serious adverse reactions occurred in 30% of OPDIVO patients. The most frequent serious adverse reaction reported in ≥2% of patients was urinary tract infection. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1% of patients; these included events of pneumonitis (0.6%). The most-common adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of patients were rash, fatigue, diarrhea, pruritus, musculoskeletal pain, and UTI. OPDIVO was discontinued or delayed due to adverse reactions in 18% and 33% of patients, respectively.5

OPDIVO is associated with the following Warnings and Precautions: severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis and hepatotoxicity, endocrinopathies, nephritis with renal dysfunction, dermatologic adverse reactions, other immune-mediated adverse reactions; infusion-related reactions; complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; embryo-fetal toxicity; and increased mortality in patients with multiple myeloma when OPDIVO is added to a thalidomide analogue and dexamethasone, which is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.

OPDIVO may cause severe infusion-related reactions. In patients who received OPDIVO as a 60-minute intravenous infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients.5 For additional information regarding infusion-related reactions, please see Important Safety Information for OPDIVO.
Checkmate-274-Defined-High-Risk-PatientsDouble-median-DFS-with-OPDIVOCheckmate 274 was not powered to detect differences in the treatment effect at extended follow-up analysis; therefore, results from this exploratory analysis should be interpreted with caution.

Adjuvant OPDIVO demonstrated superior disease-free survival (DFS) compared with placebo at the primary analysis (minimum follow-up of 5.9 months).5,6 Median DFS was 20.8 months with OPDIVO versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR=0.70 [95% CI: 0.57–0.86];P=0.0008).5 OS was also evaluated as a secondary endpoint, but at the time of the planned interim analysis, these data were immature with 33% of deaths in the ITT population; in the UTUC subpopulation, 37 deaths occurred, 20 of which occurred with OPDIVO versus 17 with placebo.5 Although the subgroup analyses were not statistically powered, for patients with prior neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy (n=308), the DFS hazard ratio was 0.52 [95% CI: 0.38–0.71] and for patients without prior neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy (n=401), the DFS hazard ratio was 0.92 [95% CI: 0.69–1.21].6 In additional exploratory subgroup analyses, no improvement in DFS was observed with nivolumab compared to placebo in patients with UTUC (n=149) the unstratified DFS hazard ratio was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.74–1.80); in patients with PD-L1 expression of <1% (n=414), the unstratified DFS hazard ratio was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.64–1.08).5

At the extended follow-up analysis (minimum follow-up of 11.0 months), mDFS was doubled with adjuvant OPDIVO compared with placebo. Median DFS was 22.0 months with OPDIVO versus 10.9 months with placebo (HR=0.70 [95% CI: 0.57–0.85]).12

Summary/conclusions
Given the high unmet need in this difficult-to-treat population, the call for approved adjuvant treatment options continues to rise.1,2 Adjuvant OPDIVO offers a chance to change the future for patients with high-risk UC as the only FDA-approved adjuvant option for adult patients with UC at high risk of recurrence after radical resection regardless of prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nodal involvement, or PD-L1 status.5,6,12 In Checkmate 274, OPDIVO significantly extended mDFS at the time of primary analysis and doubled mDFS at the time of extended follow-up analysis.5,6,12 Further data will be generated for the secondary endpoint of OS, which may provide greater insight into the efficacy of OPDIVO in this context.6,8 Given the clinical profile of Checkmate 274 and subsequent FDA approval, OPDIVO may help extend DFS for appropriate patients in need of treatment in the adjuvant UC setting.5,6,12

*Urothelial carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection.

Additional Definitions
CI=confidence interval; HCP=healthcare provider; HR=hazard ratio; ITT=intent to treat; PD-L1=programmed death ligand 1; UTUC=upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Indication
OPDIVO® (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection of UC.

Important Safety Information
Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions
Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed herein may not include all possible severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue. While immune-mediated adverse reactions usually manifest during treatment, they can also occur after discontinuation of OPDIVO. Early identification and management are essential to ensure safe use of OPDIVO. Monitor for signs and symptoms that may be clinical manifestations of underlying immune-mediated adverse reactions. Evaluate clinical chemistries including liver enzymes, creatinine, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during treatment with OPDIVO. In cases of suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, initiate appropriate workup to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.

Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). In general, if OPDIVO interruption or discontinuation is required, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose immune-mediated adverse reactions are not controlled with corticosteroid therapy. Toxicity management guidelines for adverse reactions that do not necessarily require systemic steroids (e.g., endocrinopathies and dermatologic reactions) are discussed below.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis
OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. The incidence of pneumonitis is higher in patients who have received prior thoracic radiation. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.9%), and Grade 2 (2.1%).

Immune-Mediated Colitis
OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated colitis. A common symptom included in the definition of colitis was diarrhea. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.7%) and Grade 2 (1%).

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis and Hepatotoxicity
OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (1.3%), and Grade 2 (0.4%).

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies
OPDIVO can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune- mediated thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus, which can present with diabetic ketoacidosis. Withhold OPDIVO depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). For Grade 2 or higher adrenal insufficiency, initiate symptomatic treatment, including hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Hypophysitis can present with acute symptoms associated with mass effect such as headache, photophobia, or visual field defects. Hypophysitis can cause hypopituitarism; initiate hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Thyroiditis can present with or without endocrinopathy. Hypothyroidism can follow hyperthyroidism; initiate hormone replacement or medical management as clinically indicated. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes; initiate treatment with insulin as clinically indicated.

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994), including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.6%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (0.3%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, thyroiditis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (<0.1%) and Grade 2 (1.2%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism occurred in 8% (163/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (4.8%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.3%), and 2 cases of diabetic ketoacidosis.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis with Renal Dysfunction
OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated nephritis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.5%), and Grade 2 (0.6%).

Immune-Mediated Dermatologic Adverse Reactions
OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis. Exfoliative dermatitis, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) has occurred with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate nonexfoliative rashes.

Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.1%) and Grade 2 (2.2%).

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions
The following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred at an incidence of <1% (unless otherwise noted) in patients who received OPDIVO monotherapy or were reported with the use of other PD-1/PD- L1 blocking antibodies. Severe or fatal cases have been reported for some of these adverse reactions: cardiac/vascular: myocarditis, pericarditis, vasculitis; nervous system: meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis and demyelination, myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis (including exacerbation), Guillain-Barré syndrome, nerve paresis, autoimmune neuropathy; ocular: uveitis, iritis, and other ocular inflammatory toxicities can occur; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis to include increases in serum amylase and lipase levels, gastritis, duodenitis; musculoskeletal and connective tissue: myositis/polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, and associated sequelae including renal failure, arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica; endocrine: hypoparathyroidism; other (hematologic/immune): hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sarcoidosis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ transplant rejection.

Some ocular IMAR cases can be associated with retinal detachment. Various grades of visual impairment, including blindness, can occur. If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada–like syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO, as this may require treatment with systemic corticosteroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.

Infusion-Related Reactions
OPDIVO can cause severe infusion-related reactions. Discontinue OPDIVO in patients with severe (Grade 3) or life-threatening (Grade 4) infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with mild (Grade 1) or moderate (Grade 2) infusion-related reactions. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60- minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients. In a separate trial in which patients received OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion or a 30-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.2% (8/368) and 2.7% (10/369) of patients, respectively. Additionally, 0.5% (2/368) and 1.4% (5/369) of patients, respectively, experienced adverse reactions within 48 hours of infusion that led to dose delay, permanent discontinuation or withholding of OPDIVO.

Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Fatal and other serious complications can occur in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before or after being treated with OPDIVO. Transplant-related complications include hyperacute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after reduced intensity conditioning, and steroid-requiring febrile syndrome (without an identified infectious cause). These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between OPDIVO and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for evidence of transplant-related complications and intervene promptly. Consider the benefit versus risks of treatment with OPDIVO prior to or after an allogeneic HSCT.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Based on its mechanism of action and findings from animal studies, OPDIVO can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with OPDIVO and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Increased Mortality in Patients with Multiple Myeloma when OPDIVO is Added to a Thalidomide Analogue and Dexamethasone
In randomized clinical trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of OPDIVO to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.

Lactation
There are no data on the presence of OPDIVO in human milk, the effects on the breastfed child, or the effects on milk production. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed children, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment and for 5 months after the last dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions
In Checkmate 274, serious adverse reactions occurred in 30% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=351). The most frequent serious adverse reaction reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO was urinary tract infection. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1% of patients; these included events of pneumonitis (0.6%).

Common Adverse Reactions
In Checkmate 274, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=351) were rash (36%), fatigue (36%), diarrhea (30%), pruritus (30%), musculoskeletal pain (28%), and urinary tract infection (22%).

Please see US Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO.

References
1. Drakaki A, Pantuck A, Mhatre SK, et al. “Real-world” outcomes and prognostic indicators among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2021;39:76.e15-76.e22.
2. Referenced without permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Bladder Cancer V.2.2022. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed August 4, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guidelines, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.
3. Apolo AB, Msaouel P, Niglio S, et al. Evolving Role of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Kidney and Urothelial Cancers. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:1-16. doi:10.1200/EDBK_350829.
4. Nayan M, Bhindi B, Yu JL, et al. The initiation of a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic and the uptake of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A time-series analysis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10(1-2):25-30.
5. OPDIVO [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
6. Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102-2114.
7. Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. First results from the phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial of adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in patients who underwent radical surgery for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Oral presentation at ASCO GU 2021. Abstract 391.
8. Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102-2114 [supplementary appendix].
9. American Cancer Society. Bladder cancer early detection, diagnosis, and staging. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/CRC/PDF/Public/8559.00.pdf.
10. Data on file. NIVO 639. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2021.
11. Witjes JA, Bajorin DF, Galsky MD, et al. Results for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the CheckMate 274 trial. Poster presentation at ASCO 2022. Abstract 4585.
12. Galsky MD, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Disease-free survival with longer follow-up from the phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial of adjuvant nivolumab in patients who underwent surgery for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Oral presentation at the American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting 2022. Abstract 22-3807.

© 2022 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. OPDIVO® and the related logos are trademarks of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. 1506-US-2200368 8/22

FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to LYTGOBI® for Cholangiocarcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on September 30, 2022, granted accelerated approval to LYTGOBI® (Futibatinib) for adult patients with previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene fusions or other rearrangements. Bile Tract cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) is a rare, heterogenous cancer, and comprises about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. Klatskin tumor is a type of Cholangiocarcinoma that begins in the hilum, at the junction of the left and right bile ducts. It is the most common type of Cholangiocarcinoma, accounting for more than half of all cases. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma each year and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection. The 5-year survival among those with advanced stage disease is less than 10%, with limited progress made over the past two decades.

Approximately 75% of patients are diagnosed with late-stage disease, and are often treated with Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin, based on the findings of the ABC-02 study. Second line treatment options include FOLFOX regimen, which is associated with a Response Rate of about 5%, median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of about 4 months, and median Overall Survival (OS) of about 6 months. There is therefore an unmet need for new effective therapies.

FGFRs (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors) play an important role in tumor cell proliferation and survival, migration, and angiogenesis. Activating fusions, rearrangements, translocations, and gene amplifications in FGFRs result in dysregulation of FGFR signaling, and may contribute to the pathogenesis of various cancers, including Cholangiocarcinoma. FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occur almost exclusively in intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, where they are observed in 10-20% of patients, and have been identified as oncogenic drivers. Futibatinib is a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, and demonstrated tolerability and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

The present FDA approval was based on the results from the pivotal FOENIX-CCA2 trial (NCT02052778), which is a global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study that enrolled 103 patients with previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, harboring a FGFR2 gene fusion or other rearrangement. The presence of FGFR2 fusions or other rearrangements was determined using Next Generation Sequencing testing. Patients received Futibatinib 20 mg orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median age was 58 years, 53% had an ECOG Performance Status of 1, all patients had prior anticancer therapy, with 27% receiving prior radiotherapy. FGFR2 fusions were observed in 78% of patients and 22% had a rearrangement. The median time from prior anticancer therapy to the first Futibatinib dose was 1.5 months. The Primary endpoint was Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review. Secondary endpoints were Duration of Response (DOR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. At the primary analysis of this trial, an Objective Response Rate of 41.7% was observed, with a median Duration of Response of 9.7 months. The researchers herein reported updated efficacy, including mature Overall Survival, and safety data from the final analysis, with an additional 8 months of follow up.

At a median follow up of 25 months, the median number of treatment cycles was 13.0 and the median treatment duration was 9.1 months. The confirmed Objective Response Rate was 41.7%, like what was noted at the time of primary analysis, and this benefit was consistent across patient subgroups. The Disease Control Rate of 82.5% and was similar as well. The median Duration of Response was 9.5 months, and 74% of responses lasted 6 months or more. The median PFS was 8.9 months, with a 12-month PFS rate of 35%. The median Overall Survival was 20 months, with a 12-month Overall Survival rate of 73%. The most common treatment-related adverse events included hyperphosphatemia (85%), alopecia (33%), dry mouth (30%), diarrhea (28%), dry skin (27%), and fatigue (25%). Approximately 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

The authors concluded that the final analysis of FOENIX-CCA2 study confirmed the results of the primary analysis and reinforced the durable efficacy and continued tolerability of Futibatinib in previously treated patients with advanced/metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangements. They added that the mature Overall Survival far exceeded historical data in this patient population.

Updated results of the FOENIX-CCA2 trial: Efficacy and safety of futibatinib in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Goyal L, Meric-Bernstam F, Hollebecque A, et al. J ClinOncol. 2022;40(suppl 16):4009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.4009

Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile beyond Breast and Ovarian Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

RR

SUMMARY: DNA damage is a common occurrence in daily life by UV light, ionizing radiation, replication errors, chemical agents, etc. This can result in single and double strand breaks in the DNA structure which must be repaired for cell survival. The vital pathways for DNA repair in a normal cell are BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes recognize and repair double strand DNA breaks via Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Homologous Recombination is a type of genetic recombination, and is a DNA repair pathway utilized by cells to accurately repair DNA double-stranded breaks during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and thereby maintain genomic integrity. Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) is noted following mutation of genes involved in HR repair pathway.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes located on chromosome 17 and chromosome 13 respectively and functional BRCA proteins repair damaged DNA, and play an important role in maintaining cellular genetic integrity. They regulate cell growth and prevent abnormal cell division and development of malignancy. Mutations in these genes predispose an individual to develop malignant tumors.

BRCA mutations can either be inherited (Germline) and present in all individual cells or can be acquired and occur exclusively in the tumor cells (Somatic). Somatic mutations account for a significant portion of overall BRCA1 and BRCA2 aberrations. Loss of BRCA function due to frequent somatic aberrations likely deregulates HR pathway, and other pathways then come in to play, which are less precise and error prone, resulting in the accumulation of additional mutations and chromosomal instability in the cell, with subsequent malignant transformation. Homologous Recombination Deficiency therefore indicates an important loss of DNA repair function.

Pathogenic Variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are well known to be associated with increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer in women, and reliable risk estimates are also available and can be as high as 85% and 40% respectively. However, the association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants with cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers remain uncertain, and these associations have been based on studies with relatively small sample sizes, resulting in imprecise cancer risk estimates. It is therefore important that precise risk estimates are available, in order to optimize clinical management strategies and guidelines for cancer risk management in female and male BRCA1/2 carriers. The NCCN and other guidelines recommend breast and ovarian cancer screening for BRCA1/2 carriers, prostate cancer screening for BRCA2 carriers. Screening is also recommended for pancreatic cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers, but only in the presence of a positive family history of the disease.

The researchers conducted this study to evaluate the association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, with additional cancer types and their clinical characteristics associated with pathogenic variant carrier status. For this study, a large-scale registry based sequencing study was performed across 14 common cancer types in 63, 828 patients and 37, 086 controls, whose data were drawn from a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional hospital-based biobank, between 2003 and 2018. In the study group, the median age was 64 years and 42% were female, whereas the median age was 62 years and 47% were female in the control group. Germline pathogenic variants were identified in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by a multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-based target sequence method. Associations of (likely) pathogenic variants with each cancer type were assessed by comparing pathogenic variant carrier frequency between patients in each cancer type and controls. Compared with the researchers previous publications for breast, colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, this study included 14,448 additional controls and 8247 additional cancer cases. These data thus provided a broad view of cancer risks associated with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 were significantly associated with increased risk for three other types of cancer types, Biliary tract (Odds Ratio–OR=17.4), Gastric (OR=5.2), and Pancreatic cancer (OR=12.6), in addition to female Breast (OR=16.1) and Ovarian cancer (OR=75.6). Pathogenic variants in BRCA2 increased risk for seven cancer types which included female Breast (OR=10.9), male Breast (OR=67.9), Gastric (OR=4.7), Ovarian (OR=11.3), Pancreatic (OR=10.7), Prostate (OR=4.0), and Esophageal cancer (OR=5.6). Further, Biliary tract, female Breast, Ovarian, and Prostate cancers showed enrichment of carrier patients according to the increased number of reported cancer types in relatives.

The results of this large study suggested that pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 are associated with increased risk of biliary tract, gastric, and esophageal cancers, higher than for European populations, granted that these cancers are known to have a higher incidence rate in East Asian countries. Conversely in this study, the cumulative risk of prostate cancer for BRCA2 carriers was lower than that estimated in the UK and Ireland, suggesting that the cumulative risk for each cancer type may be associated with the different incidence rate in each country.

The authors concluded that this study suggested that pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with the risk of 7 cancer types and is likely broader than that determined from previous analysis of largely European ancestry cohorts. It would therefore be useful to expand indications for genetic testing of individuals with family history of these cancer types.

Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants. Momozawa Y, Sasai R, Usui Y, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Apr 14: e220476. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0476 [Epub ahead of print]

FDA Grants Tumor-Agnostic Accelerated Approval to RETEVMO®

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on September 21, 2022, granted accelerated approval to Selpercatinib (RETEVMO®) for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a Rearranged during Transfection (RET) gene fusion that have progressed on or following prior systemic treatment, or who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. The FDA on the same day also granted Regular approval to Selpercatinib for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with a Rearranged during Transfection (RET) gene fusion, as detected by an FDA-approved test. FDA also approved the Oncomine Dx Target (ODxT) Test as a companion diagnostic for Selpercatinib.

In addition to the well characterized gene fusions involving ALK and ROS1 in NSCLC, genetic alterations involving other kinases including EGFR, BRAF, RET, NTRK, are all additional established targetable drivers. These genetic alterations are generally mutually exclusive, with no more than one predominant driver in any given cancer. The hallmark of all these genetic alterations is oncogene addiction, in which cancers are driven primarily, or even exclusively, by aberrant oncogene signaling, and are highly susceptible to small molecule inhibitors.

RET kinase is a transmembrane Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and plays an important role during the development and maintenance of a variety of tissues, including neural and genitourinary tissues. RET signaling activates downstream pathways such as JAK/STAT3 and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and leads to cellular proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis. Oncogenic alterations to the RET proto-oncogene result in uncontrolled cell growth and enhanced tumor invasiveness. RET alterations include RET rearrangements, leading to RET fusions, and activating point mutations occurring across multiple tumor types. RET fusions have been identified in approximately 2% of NSCLCs, 10-20% of non-medullary thyroid cancers. Activating RET point mutations account for approximately 60% of sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancers (MTC) and more than 90% of inherited MTCs. Other cancers with documented RET alterations include colorectal, pancreas, breast, and several hematologic malignancies.

Selpercatinib is a highly selective and potent, oral anti-RET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) designed to inhibit native RET signaling, as well as anticipated acquired resistance mechanisms. Selpercatinib selectively targets wild-type RET as well as various RET mutants and RET-containing fusion products. Additionally, Selpercatinib inhibits Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 (VEGFR1), VEGFR3, Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1), FGFR2, and FGFR3. This results in inhibition of cell growth of tumors that exhibit increased RET activity.

The LIBRETTO-001 is the largest open-label, multicenter, Phase I/II trial in patients with advanced solid tumors, including RET fusion-positive solid tumors, RET-mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancers, and other tumors with RET activation, treated with a RET inhibitor. To investigate the efficacy of Selpercatinib, the trial was conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1 (dose escalation) and Phase II (dose expansion). Patients with advanced cancer were eligible, if they have progressed on or were intolerant to available standard therapies, or no standard or available curative therapy existed, or in the opinion of the Investigator, they would be unlikely to tolerate or derive significant clinical benefit from appropriate standard of care therapy, or they declined standard therapy. A dose of 160 mg BID was the recommended Phase II dose. Up to about 850 patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a RET gene alteration in tumor and/or blood were enrolled in 6 different Phase II cohorts, based on tumor type, RET alteration and prior therapy. Identification of RET gene alterations were prospectively determined in local laboratories using either Next Generation Sequencing, Polymerase Chain Reaction, or Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. The Phase II portion of the trial had a Primary endpoint of Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) and Secondary endpoints of Duration of Response, CNS Objective Response Rate, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and safety.

RET Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors
This group included 41 patients and the most common cancers were pancreatic adenocarcinoma (27%), colorectal (24%), salivary (10%), and unknown primary (7%). Majority of the patients (90%) received 2 prior systemic therapies and 32% had received 3 or more. The median age of patients was 50 years, 54% were female, 68% were White, 24% were Asian, and 95% had metastatic disease. RET fusion-positive status was detected in 98% of patients using NGS and 2% using FISH.

The Objective Response Rate was 44%, with 5% Complete Response and 39% Partial Response. The median Duration of response was 24.5 months and 67% of patients had a Duration of Response of 6 months or more.

The NSCLC Cohort
Selpercatinib was previously granted accelerated approval in May 2020 for patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC based on initial Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) among 144 patients enrolled in the LIBRETTO-001 trial. The conversion to regular and traditional FDA approval was based on data from an additional 172 patients and 18 months of additional follow up, to assess durability of response. Patients received Selpercatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and efficacy was evaluated in a total of 316 patients with locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC. The median age of patients was 61 years, 58% were female, 49% were White, 41% were Asian and 97% had metastatic disease. Previously treated patients received a median of two prior systemic therapies and 58% had received prior anti PD 1/PD-L1 therapy.

Among the 69 treatment-naïve patients, the ORR was 84%, with 6% Complete Response and 78% Partial Response. The median Duration of Response was 20.2 months and 50% of patients had a Duration of Response of 12 months or more. Among the 247 previously treated patients, the ORR was 61%, with 7% Complete Response and 54% Partial Response. The median Duration of Response was 28.6 months and 63% of patients had a Duration of Response of 12 months or more.

It is estimated that up to 50% of RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients can have brain metastases, and in the subset of patients with brain metastases (N=21), treatment with Selpercatinib demonstrated a CNS Objective Response Rate of 85%, and 38% of responders had an intracranial Duration of Response of 12 months or greater. The most common toxicities in patients were edema, diarrhea, fatigue, dry mouth, hypertension, abdominal pain, constipation, rash, nausea, and headache.

LIBRETTO-001 is the largest trial ever reported in RET-altered cancer patients and represents an important milestone in the Precision Medicine arena. Selpercatinib is the first and only RET inhibitor to receive both tumor-agnostic accelerated approval and traditional approval in NSCLC, reinforcing its benefits across diverse tumor types.

Selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion–positive non–small-cell lung cancer: updated safety and efficacy from the registrational libretto-001 phase I/II trial.Published September 19, 2022. Drilon A, Subbiah V, Gautschi O, et al. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00393

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-selpercatinib-locally-advanced-or-metastatic-ret-fusion-positive-solid-tumors

Avoiding Radioiodine Therapy following Thyroidectomy in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that about 43,800 new cases of thyroid cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2022 and about 2,230 patients will die of the disease. Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy and includes Papillary, Follicular, and Hürthle-cell cancers, with Papillary thyroid cancers accounting for 80% of them. Majority of patients with DTC have clinical Stage I or Stage II disease, with a recurrence rate of less than 5% and cancer-related death rates even lower. Risk factors for recurrence include tumor size, multifocality, capsular or angioinvasion, degree of cervical lymph node involvement, existence of BRAF V600E Mutation, and thyroglobulin levels more than 0.5 ng/mL, after thyroidectomy.

Even though Radioiodine (iodine-131) therapy is not recommended for patients with a unifocal microcarcinoma (10 mm or less in diameter) following thyroidectomy, Radioiodine therapy is generally offered to a majority of patients with low-risk thyroid cancer, both to ablate residual normal thyroid tissue and to treat unresectable persistent disease. The benefits of this intervention however remain controversial. .

The authors conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, Phase III Essai Stimulation Ablation 2 (ESTIMABL2) trial involving patients with low-risk thyroid cancer, to assess the non-inferiority of observation versus postoperative Radioiodine therapy, following thyroidectomy. In this study, a total of 776 patients with low-risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer who were undergoing thyroidectomy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ablation with postoperative Radioiodine therapy at a dose of 1.1 GBq (N=389) or no Radioiodine therapy (N=387). Enrolled patients had Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (Papillary, Follicular, or Oncocytic/Hürthle-cell cancer), with a multifocal pT1a tumor or a pT1b tumor. None of the patients had regional lymph node involvement, extrathyroidal extension or aggressive histologic subtypes (tall-cell, clear-cell, columnar-cell, and diffuse sclerosing variants of Papillary thyroid cancer, poorly differentiated). The mean patient age was 52 years, and 83% were women, 96% had papillary tumors 81% had pT1b N0 or Nx disease. All patients had normal results on postoperative neck ultrasonography. The follow-up protocol consisted of the measurement of thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin antibodies in all patients at 10 months and yearly thereafter. Ultrasonography of the neck was performed in all patients 10 months and 3 years after randomization. Disease-related events included residual or recurrent disease on neck ultrasonography and a serum thyroglobulin level of more than 1 ng/mL in the group receiving radioiodine and a level of more than 5 ng/mL in the nontreated group. No diagnostic Radioiodine scanning was performed after the whole-body scanning that was performed after therapy. The Primary objective was to assess whether no Radioiodine therapy was noninferior to Radioiodine therapy, with respect to the absence of a composite end point that included functional, structural, and biologic abnormalities, indicating residual or recurrent disease at 3 years.

After 3 years of follow up, there were no clinically meaningful differences in any of the end points between the two groups and the percentage of patients without an event was 95.6% in the no-Radioiodine therapy group and 95.9% in the Radioiodine therapy group, a result that met the noninferiority criteria. Events were more frequent in patients with a postoperative serum thyroglobulin level of more than 1 ng/mL during thyroid hormone treatment. BRAF V600E molecular alterations, which are associated aggressive tumor characteristics, were found in approximately 50% of the samples in each treatment group. The mutational status did not influence event rates in these low-risk patients. No treatment-related adverse events were reported and there was no difference in Quality-of-Life scores between the two groups.

It was concluded that in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer undergoing thyroidectomy, follow up without the use of Radioiodine therapy was noninferior to an ablation strategy with Radioiodine therapy, suggesting that patients with low-risk disease generally do well, regardless of whether they receive Radioiodine therapy.

Thyroidectomy without Radioiodine in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer. Leboulleux S, Bournaud C, Chougnet CN, et al. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:923-932

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2022: PADCEV® plus KEYTRUDA® in Previously Untreated Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States for 2022, about 81,180 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed and approximately 17,100 patients will die of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but it is less common in women. A third of the patients initially present with locally invasive or metastatic disease. Patients with urothelial carcinoma are currently treated in the first line setting with a Platinum based chemotherapy regimen, and a checkpoint Inhibitor (PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor) in the second line setting. Approximately 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma are ineligible for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There is therefore a critical need for effective and tolerable first line treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (PADCEV®) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets Nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule highly expressed in urothelial cancers and other solid tumors. Nectin-4 has been implicated in tumor cell growth and proliferation. Following binding to Nectin-4 on the cell surface, Enfortumab vedotin becomes internalized and is processed by lysosomes, with the liberation of its cytotoxic payload, Monomethyl auristatin E, which in turn disrupts microtubule assembly, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Enfortumab vedotin resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, and a higher Overall Response Rate, than standard chemotherapy, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who had previously received Platinum-based treatment and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Preclinical studies with Enfortumab vedotin have shown hallmarks of immune cell death potentially augmented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and the rationale for this clinical trial was based on results from a previous cohort study.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. Pembrolizumab is the first agent to improve Overall Survival over chemotherapy, in the second line setting, for patients with recurrent, advanced urothelial carcinoma, and a significant proportion of patients who respond, have very durable responses.

EV-103 is a clinical trial conducted to examine the safety and efficacy of Enfortumab vedotin given as monotherapy, and in combination with other anticancer therapies, as first line and second line treatment, for patients with urothelial cancer. This study was conducted in multiple parts for both locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and muscle invasive bladder cancer.

EV-103/KEYNOTE-869 Cohort K is a randomized cohort investigating Enfortumab vedotin alone or in combination with Pembrolizumab as first line treatment in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, who are ineligible to receive Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In this Phase Ib/II randomized study, 149 eligible patients (N=149) were randomly assigned to receive a combination of Enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg given intravenously on days 1 and 8, and Pembrolizumab 200 mg given intravenously on day 1, every 21 days (N=76) or Enfortumab vedotin monotherapy given on the same schedule (N=73). Ineligibility for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy could be due to at least one of the following: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min, ECOG Performance Status of 2, Grade 2 or more hearing loss, or New York Heart Association Class III heart failure. No prior systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease, and adjuvant/neoadjuvant Platinum-based therapy within 12 months prior to randomization, were allowed. The Primary endpoint was confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR (Blinded Independent Central Review). Secondary endpoints included Duration of Response (DOR), Safety, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS).

At a median follow up of 14.2 months, the confirmed Objective Response Rate was 64.5% with the Enfortumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab combination, with 10.5% of patients experiencing a Complete Response and 53.9% of patients experiencing a Partial Response. The median Duration of Response was not reached. The most common Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (55.6%), fatigue (51.1%), and alopecia (48.9%).

It was concluded that in Cisplatin-ineligible patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, treatment with Enfortumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab combination in chemo naïve patients, resulted in high Overall Response Rate, along with a safety profile that was tolerable. The authors added that Antibody-Drug Conjugates have the potential to make a greater impact in treating bladder cancer, especially in combination with checkpoint inhibitors, as shown in this trial and these data support ongoing investigations of first line Enfortumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Study EV-103 Cohort K: Antitumor activity of enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in previously untreated cisplatin-ineligible patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). Rosenberg JE, Milowsky M, Ramamurthy C, et al. Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S808-S869. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1089. LBA73

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2022: Neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA® with Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the US for 2022, about 54,000 new cases of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer will be diagnosed and about 11,230 patients will die of the disease. Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the head and neck, frequently present with locoregionally advanced disease.

The treatment paradigm for Head and Neck cancer has been rapidly evolving with the recognition and better understanding of immune evasion and the role of immune checkpoints or gate keepers in suppressing antitumor immunity. Blocking the immune checkpoints unleashes the T cells, resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. Checkpoint inhibitors administered in a neoadjuvant setting activates both the priming phase of immunity within tumor tissue, and the effector phase within the tumor microenvironment. It has been shown that neoadjuvant immunotherapy expands more T-cell clones than adjuvant treatment. Preclinical models have also demonstrated that both radiation therapy and Cisplatin chemotherapy increase the PD-L1 expression on the tumor, suggesting that combining radiotherapy with anti-PD-1 therapy could improve the outcomes.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, monoclonal antibody and checkpoint inhibitor, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the tumor-specific effector T cells. Pembrolizumab has been shown to improve Overall Survival in patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

KEYNOTE-412 is a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiation versus placebo in combination with chemoradiation, in treatment naïve patients with locally advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell carcinoma. In this study, 804 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks plus chemoradiation (70Gy in 35 fractions along with Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks) followed by Pembrolizumab (N=402), or placebo every 3 weeks plus chemoradiation, followed by placebo (N=402). Patients received Pembrolizumab /placebo priming dose 1 week before chemoradiation, followed by 2 doses during chemoradiation and 14 doses of maintenance therapy after chemoradiation, for a total of 17 doses. Enrolled patients had newly diagnosed, pathologically proven, treatment naive locally advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell carcinoma (T3-T4, N0-N3 or any N2a-3, T1-T4 larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity/p16-negative oropharynx cancers, or T4 or N3 p16-positive oropharynx cancer). Both treatment groups were well balanced. The Primary endpoint was Event Free Survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), and Safety.

At the time of data cutoff, with a median follow up of 47.7 months, there was a favorable trend toward improved Event Free Survival (EFS) with the addition of Pembrolizumab vs placebo to chemoradiation (HR 0.83, P=0.04), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The 2-year EFS was 63.2% in the Pembrolizumab group and 56.2% in the placebo group. In an exploratory analysis however, the 2-year EFS among patients with high expression of PD-L1 (CPS 20 or higher) was 71% in the Pembrolizumab group and 62% in the placebo group. A favorable of Overall Survival benefit was also observed among these patients, with a 3-year OS of 79% in Pembrolizumab group and 73% in the placebo group.

It was concluded that Pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiation was associated with a favorable trend toward improved Event Free Survival, compared with placebo plus chemoradiation, in patients with locally advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell carcinoma, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The researchers added that perhaps patients with high CPS score on the tumor could benefit with this treatment approach.

Primary results of the phase III KEYNOTE-412 study: Pembrolizumab (pembro) with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) vs placebo plus CRT for locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Machiels J, Tao Y, Burtness B, et al. Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S808-S869. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1089. LBA5

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2022: Abemaciclib plus Transtuzumab versus Chemotherapy in HR-positive, HER2-positive Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 290,560 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and about 43,780 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and approximately 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors. The most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer is Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer (65% of all metastatic breast tumors), and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is reported in about 15%-20% of primary breast carcinomas and is associated with poor prognosis, and nearly half of HER2-positive breast cancers are also HR-positive. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancers are generally treated with HER2-targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy. Patients with HER2-positive and HR-positive breast cancer are additionally treated with long-term hormone therapy.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDKs) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib) is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase activity, and prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein, thereby inducing G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell proliferation. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2 oncogene. FASLODEX® (Fulvestrant) is a parenteral, Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) and is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR-positive metastatic breast cancer.

monarcHER (NCT02675231) is an International, randomized, multicenter, open-label, three-group, Phase 2 trial, conducted to compare the efficacy of Abemaciclib plus Trastuzumab with or without Fulvestrant, with standard-of-care chemotherapy of physician’s choice plus trastuzumab, in women with advanced breast cancer. In this study, 237 patients were enrolled. Eligible patients had Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease, and had previously received at least two HER2-targeted therapies for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to Group A (Abemaciclib, Trastuzumab, and Fulvestrant) N=79, Group B (Abemaciclib and Trastuzumab) N=79, or Group C (standard-of-care chemotherapy and trastuzumab) N=79. Treatment consisted of Abemaciclib 150 mg orally twice daily on days 1-21 of a 21-day cycle, Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg IV on cycle 1, day 1, followed by 6 mg/kg IV on day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle, and Fulvestrant 500 mg IM on days 1, 15, and 29 and once every 4 weeks thereafter. Standard-of-care chemotherapy was administered as specified by the product label. Patients were stratified by number of previous systemic therapies for advanced breast cancer and measurable versus non-measurable disease. An exploratory biomarker analysis of breast cancer molecular subtypes was conducted by RNA sequencing. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS), first testing Group A versus Group C, and if this result was significant, then Group B versus Group C. Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate, Patient Reported Outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. Safety was assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment.

Previous analyses from this trial revealed that after a median follow up of 19.0 months, the Primary endpoint was met, with significantly superior PFS in Group A compared to Group C (8.3 months versus 5.7 months, respectively, HR=0.67; P=0.051), with a reduction in the risk for disease progression or death of 33%. (Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:763–775). The researchers herein reported the results, after a median follow up of 52.9 months.

The median Overall Survival was 31.1 months in Group A, 29.2 months in Group B and 20.7 months in Group C. When Group A was compared with Group C, the triplet regimen with Abemaciclib, Trastuzumab, and Fulvestrant (Group A) induced a statistically significant improvement in Overall Survival, compared with Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (Group C). There was a numerically improved Overall Survival benefit with Abemaciclib, in combination with HER2-targeted therapy (Trastuzumab) with or without hormonal therapy (Fulvestrant), compared with chemotherapy plus Trastuzumab, and there was a consistent benefit observed with the addition of Abemaciclib across all pre-specified subgroups. Updated Progression Free Survival and safety findings were consistent with the primary analysis. An exploratory biomarker analysis by RNA sequencing suggested that Luminal subtypes were associated with longer Progression Free Survival (8.6 versus 5.4 months, HR=0.54) and Overall Survival (31.7 versus 19.7 months, HR=0.68), compared to non-Luminal subtypes. The most common serious adverse events in Group A were pyrexia, diarrhea, urinary tract infection, and acute kidney injury (3% each); in Group B were diarrhea and pneumonitis (3% each); and in Group C were neutropenia (6%) and pleural effusion (3%).

The authors concluded that based on this final analysis, a triple-agent, chemotherapy-free treatment regimen consisting of Abemaciclib plus Trastuzumab, with or without Fulvestrant, numerically improved Overall Survival in women with Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer, compared to chemotherapy plus Trastuzumab.

Final overall survival (OS) for abemaciclib plus trastuzumab +/- fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer (monarcHER): A randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Andre F, Nadal JC, Denys H, et al. Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S808-S869. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1089. LBA18

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2022: CABOMETYX®, OPDIVO® and YERVOY® in Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 79,000 new cases of kidney cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2022 and about 13,920 people will die from this disease. Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five-year survival of patients with advanced RCC is about 14% and there is a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease.

OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, whereas YERVOY® (Ipilimumab) is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks Immune checkpoint protein/receptor CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152). Blocking the Immune checkpoint proteins unleashes the T cells, resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. The FDA in 2018, granted approvals to OPDIVO® and YERVOY® in combination, for the treatment of Intermediate or Poor-risk, previously untreated advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

CABOMETYX® (Cabozantinib) is an oral, small-molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), which targets Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors (VEGFR), as well as tyrosine kinases MET and AXL. Both MET and AXL are upregulated in Renal Cell Carcinoma as a consequence of VHL inactivation, and increased expression of MET and AXL is associated with tumor progression and development of resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Further, CABOMETYX® promotes an immune-permissive environment, which may enhance response to checkpoint inhibitors. CABOMETYX® was approved by the FDA in 2016 for the treatment of advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

COSMIC-313 is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, ongoing Phase III pivotal trial, conducted to evaluate the triplet combination of Cabozantinib, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab versus the doublet combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, in patients with previously untreated advanced Intermediate or Poor-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma. COSMIC-313 was designed to answer whether adding Cabozantinib to dual checkpoint inhibition can improve outcomes among patients with Intermediate and Poor-risk advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

In this trial, 855 treatment naïve, advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma patients of IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) Intermediate or Poor risk were randomized 1:1 to receive Cabozantinib plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (N=428) or placebo plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (N=427). Patients in the study group received Cabozantinib 40 mg, orally once daily in combination with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV and Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks for 4 doses total followed by Cabozantinib 40 mg orally once daily and Nivolumab 480 mg/kg flat dose IV, once every 4 weeks for up to 2 years. Patients in the control group received the same regimen, but instead of Cabozantinib, received a matched placebo. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 60 years, 75% were men, 63% had PD-L1 expression of less than 1%, 75% had Intermediate-risk disease, 25% were Poor risk, and 65% had prior nephrectomy. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS), as assessed by Blinded Independent Radiology Committee (BIRC). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Safety. The median follow up was 20.2 months.

The study met the Primary endpoint and the median PFS was not reached in the Cabozantinib group and was 11.3 months in the placebo group (HR=0.73; P=0.013). Patients treated with the Cabozantinib three-drug combination had a 27% lower risk of disease progression or death compared to those on the two drug immunotherapy combination. This PFS benefit was predominantly noted in the Intermediate-risk group. The Objective Response Rate was 43% with the Cabozantinib combination versus 36% in the placebo plus dual immunotherapy group, with 3% of patients achieving a Complete Response in both treatment groups. The Disease Control Rate was 86% and 72%, respectively. The median Duration of Response was not reached in either treatment group. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 73% of patients treated with the combination of Cabozantinib, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, and in 41% of patients treated with the Nivolumab and Ipilimumab combination. Discontinuation of all treatment agents due to adverse events occurred in 12% and 5% of patients, respectively.

The authors concluded that this is the first study to show that a TKI added to dual checkpoint inhibition significantly improved Progression Free Survival, in patients with untreated, Intermediate or Poor risk advanced kidney cancer, compared to doublet immunotherapy. Follow-up for Overall Survival is ongoing.

Phase III study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) of IMDC intermediate or poor risk (COSMIC-313). Choueiri TK, Powles TB, Albiges L, et al. Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S808-S869. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1089. LBA8