Author: RR

Less Frequent Mammography after Curative Treatment in Older Women with Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S.

Currently, the major national health care organizations in the US have different recommendations for screening mammography which has led to some confusion and emotional counterarguments. These several different recommendations include 1) Annual screening at ages 40 to 84 years 2) Annual screening at ages 45 to 54 years and then biennially at ages 55 to 79 years 3) Biennial screening at ages 50 to 74 years.
Elderly women with a history of breast cancer have a higher risk for a second breast cancer diagnosis. However, appropriate mammographic surveillance methods for this patient group, remains unclear. The widespread practice of annual surveillance mammograms for an unspecified period of time after treatment for early breast cancer can be a significant burden of health care costs in the US.

Mammo-50 trial is a multicenter, randomized Phase III study conducted to assess annual mammography versus less frequent mammography for up to 9 years, in women 50 years or older at the time of their diagnosis with breast cancer. The goal of this study was to determine the optimum frequency and duration of mammographic surveillance. In this study 5,235 women were randomly assigned 1:1 to undergo annual mammograms (N=2618) or less frequent mammograms (N=2617). Less frequent mammography was defined as every 2 years in patients who underwent breast-conservation surgery (N=2099) and every 3 years in patients who had a mastectomy (N=518). Eligible enrolled patients were 50 years of age or older, had undergone curative-intent treatment for invasive or non-invasive breast cancer, and were 3 years post-surgery. Approximately 83% of women were aged 55-75 years, and 87% had invasive disease between the two cohorts. The compliance rates were 83% for the annual mammogram group and 69% for the less frequent mammography group. Approximately 35% of patients missed mammograms due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Primary study outcomes were Breast Cancer-specific survival and cost effectiveness, whereas Secondary outcomes included Recurrence Free Interval and Overall Survival.

The researchers noted that the efficacy outcomes with regards to breast cancer-specific survival, 5-year recurrence-free interval and OS were similar between the two cohorts of patients. The breast cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 98.1% among patients in the annual mammography cohort and 98.3% among patients in the less frequent mammography cohort. The 5-year Recurrence Free interval rates were 94.1% for the annual mammography group and 94.5% among patients in the less frequent mammography cohort. The 5-year Overall Survival was 94.7% in the annual mammography cohort and 94.5% in the less frequent mammography cohort. Even though compliance in the less frequent mammography group was lower, a sensitivity analysis confirmed this had no effect on the outcomes.

It was concluded from this trial that less frequent mammograms were no worse than undergoing annual mammograms for this group of women,

Mammographic surveillance in early breast cancer patients aged 50 years or over: Results from the Mammo-50 non-inferiority trial of annual versus less frequent mammography. Dunn JA, Donnelly P, Elbeltagi N, et al. Presented at SABCS 2023. December 5-9, 2023. San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS03-02.

Biomarker Driven ELAHERE® in FR alpha-Positive, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: It is estimated that in the United States, approximately 19,710 women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2023, and 13,270 women will die of the disease. Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women, and accounts for more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. Approximately 75% of the ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. About 85% of all ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin, and 70% of all epithelial ovarian cancers are High-Grade serous adenocarcinomas. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy following primary surgical cytoreduction. Approximately 70% of these patients will relapse within the subsequent 3 years and are incurable, with a 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rate of about 20-30%. Treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer are limited, and patients are often treated with single-agent chemotherapy, with an Overall Response Rate (ORR) of between 4% and 13%, short duration of response, and significant toxicities.

Approximately 35-40% of ovarian cancer patients express high levels of Folate Receptor alpha (FR alpha), and this expression correlates with advanced stages of disease and more malignant phenotypes. There is limited expression of Folate Receptor alpha in normal tissues and is limited to the choroid plexus, proximal renal tubules, placenta, and endometrium. Testing for Folate Receptor alpha can be performed on fresh or archived tissue.

ELAHERE® (Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx) is a first-in-class Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), directed against FR alpha, a cell-surface protein highly expressed in ovarian cancer. It is comprised of a Folate Receptor alpha-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid payload DM4, which is a potent tubulin inhibitor, disrupting microtubule formation, and thereby designed to kill the targeted cancer cells. Microtubules are major components of the cytoskeleton that give shape and structure to cells. ELAHERE® is the first FDA approved ADC for platinum-resistant disease. In the single-arm SORAYA trial, ELAHERE® demonstrated an ORR of 31.7% and median Duration of Response of 6.9 months, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and prior Bevacizumab exposure. These response rates were consistently seen regardless of the number of prior therapies or the use of a prior PARP inhibitor. As a result, the FDA in November 2022 granted accelerated approval to ELAHERE®.

MIRASOL is a confirmatory randomized Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ELAHERE® versus Standard-of-Care chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated, platinum-resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer, whose tumors express high levels of FR alpha. In this study, 453 eligible patients (N=453) were randomized 1:1 to receive ELAHERE® 6 mg/kg (based on adjusted ideal body weight) IV infusion once every three weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (N=227), or investigators choice of single-agent chemotherapy – Paclitaxel, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, or Topotecan (N=226)). Both treatment groups were well balanced. Approximately 13% of patients had BRCA mutations, 14% of patients had one prior line of therapy, 39% had two prior lines and 47% had three prior lines of therapy. About 62% received prior Bevacizumab and 55% received prior therapy with PARP inhibitors. The Primary efficacy endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR), Overall Survival (OS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes in hierarchical order, as well as Safety and tolerability. The median follow up was 13.1 months.

This study met its Primary and key Secondary endpoints with statistically significant improvement in PFS, ORR and OS. The PFS in the ELAHERE® group was 5.62 months compared to 3.98 months in the chemotherapy group (HR=0.65; P<0.0001). The ORR was also higher in the ELAHERE® group at 42% compared with 16% in the chemotherapy group (P<0.0001). The median Overall Survival rate was 16.46 months among patients who received ELAHERE® compared with 12.75 months among those who received single-agent chemotherapy (HR=0.67; P=0.005). The PFS and OS outcomes favored the ELAHERE® group, irrespective of prior exposure to Bevacizumab. Treatment with ELAHERE® was associated with a lower rate of Grade 3 or more Adverse Events and a lower discontinuation rate (9% compared with 16% for the chemotherapy group). The most common adverse reactions including laboratory abnormalities associated with ELAHERE® were vision impairment, keratopathy, fatigue, nausea, peripheral neuropathy, increase in ALT and AST and cytopenias. Product labeling includes a boxed warning for ocular toxicity. The ocular events were reversible and primarily included low-grade blurred vision and keratopathy, which were managed with protocol-defined dose modifications. Approximately 60% of patients with symptoms had resolution prior to their next cycle of treatment, and less than 1% of patients discontinued therapy due to an ocular event.

It was concluded that treatment with ELAHERE® demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in Progression Free Survival and Overall survival, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and high FR alpha expression, independent of Bevacizumab use, and may be the new standard-of-care for this patient group. ELAHERE® is the first FDA-approved Antibody Drug Conjugate and biomarker directed therapy for ovarian cancer, since the approval of PARP inhibitors.

Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in FRα-Positive, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. Moore KN, Angelergues A, Konecny GE, et al. N. Engl J Med 2023;389:2162-2174

Omitting Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Younger Low Risk Postmenopausal Patients

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype.

Patient undergoing breast conserving surgery, often receive adjuvant breast radiation therapy to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Radiation therapy however is inconvenient, expensive and can be associated with acute and late toxicities. Several previously published trials explored the omission of radiotherapy in low risk patients, following Breast Conservative Surgery. In the CALGB 9343 trial involving women 70 years or older with Stage I, ER-positive breast cancer, treated with Breast Conservative Surgery, locoregional recurrence at 10 years was 10% among those randomly assigned to omission of radiotherapy group and 2% among those assigned to radiotherapy. Similarly, in the PRIME II trial, women 65 years and older with node-negative tumors 3 cm or smaller in size, treated with Breast Conservative Surgery and Endocrine Therapy, had a local recurrence rate of 10% at 10 years when radiation was omitted versus 1% among those assigned to radiotherapy. In the LUMINA trial, women 55 years of age and over with low grade Luminal A breast cancer following Breast Conserving Surgery, Endocrine Therapy and without radiotherapy, had a local recurrence rate of 2.3% at 5 years. These trials provided a new option to elderly patients who wished to avoid radiotherapy

The IDEA (Individualized Decisions for Endocrine therapy Alone) study is a prospective, multicenter cohort trial, initiated at 13 US institutions in 2015. This single-arm study was designed to explore the feasibility of omitting radiotherapy in younger postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer, based on genomic assay, in addition to clinicopathologic risk factors. The IDEA study was inspired by the desire to expand treatment options for de-escalation of therapy for patients with low molecular risk early stage breast cancer, based on prospective clinical data. In this study 200 eligible patients (N=200) were enrolled. This trial included postmenopausal patients 50-69 years of age, with pT1N0 unifocal invasive breast cancer, with margins 2 mm or more after lumpectomy, whose tumors were ER-positive, PR-positive and HER2-negative, with Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence score of 18 or less. Patients consented to at least 5 years of Endocrine Therapy after lumpectomy and omitting radiotherapy. The mean age was 62 years, mean tumor size was 10 mm and mean 21-gene recurrence score was 11. Histology was ductal in 85% and lobular in 10%, 42.5% had Grade I, 54.5% had Grade II, and 3% had Grade III tumors, respectively, and lymphovascular invasion was present in 14% of tumors. Patients with bilateral disease, a previous personal history of breast cancer, previous radiotherapy to the breast region, or a known carrier of a mutation that predisposes toward breast cancer development (including BRCA-1 and BRCA-2), were excluded. The Primary end point was the rate of locoregional recurrence, 5 years after Breast Conserving Surgery.

With a clinical follow up of at least 56 months among 186 patients, the Overall Survival (OS) and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival rates at 5 years were both 100%. The 5-year freedom from any recurrence was 99%. Crude rates of Ipsilateral Breast Events for the entire follow up period for patients age 50-59 years and age 60-69 years were 3.3% and 3.6%, respectively, and crude rates of overall recurrence were 5.0% and 3.6%, respectively. No distant recurrences were observed.

It was concluded from this study that high disease control can be accomplished at 5 years after omission of radiotherapy, in postmenopausal patients with pT1N0 unifocal invasive breast cancer with favorable biologic features. The authors added that the IDEA study is the first prospective trial to incorporate a genomic assay of low molecular risk, to identify appropriate candidates for omission of breast radiotherapy.

Omission of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Women With Breast Cancer With Low Clinical and Genomic Risk: 5-Year Outcomes of IDEA. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Harris EE, et al. Published online December 07, 2023. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.02270 Journal of Clinical Oncology.

FDA Approves KEYTRUDA® with Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Gastric or GE Junction Adenocarcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 16, 2023, approved Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) with Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum containing chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal Junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The American Cancer Society estimates that in the US about 26,500 new Gastric cancer cases will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 11,130 people will die of the disease. It is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world. Several hereditary syndromes such as Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC), Lynch syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer) and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) have been associated with a predisposition for Gastric cancer. Additionally, one of the strongest risk factor for Gastric adenocarcinoma is infection with Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), which is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped microaerophilic bacterium.

Patients with localized disease (Stage II and Stage III) are often treated with multimodality therapy and 40% of the patients may survive for 5 years or more. However, majority of the patients with Gastric and GastroEsophageal junction Adenocarcinoma have advanced disease at the time of initial presentation and have limited therapeutic options with little or no chance for cure. These patients frequently are treated with Platinum containing chemotherapy along with a Fluoropyrimidine and, if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy. This can however be associated with significant toxicities impacting patient’s quality of life. The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy has been demonstrated in Gastric and GastroEsophageal cancer.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. It thereby reverses the PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells.

The present FDA approval was based on KEYNOTE-859, which is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the benefit of adding Pembrolizumab to Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal cancer. In this study, 1,579 patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal adenocarcinoma, with known a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS), were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV (N=790) or placebo (N=789), every 3 weeks for 35 cycles or less, given along with investigator’s choice of 5-FU plus Cisplatin or Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin (CAPOX). Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups and randomization was stratified by region, PD-L1 CPS (less than 1 versus 1 or more), and choice of chemotherapy. At baseline, 78% of patients had PD-L1 CPS 1 or more, while 35% had tumors with CPS 10 or more. The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS) by blinded Independent Central Review. Secondary end points included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR) and Safety. The researchers provided the data from the interim analysis, at a median follow up of 31.0 months.

The median Overall Survival was 12.9 months with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus 11.5 months with chemotherapy alone (HR=0.78, P<0.0001). The median PFS was 6.9 months versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR=0.76, P<0.0001). The benefit with Pembrolizumab was consistent across subgroups, including those by PD-L1 CPS. The risk reduction was especially notable among patients with MicroSatellite Instability (MSI)-High status, who had a 66% relative reduction in the risk of death, and patients with PD-L1 CPS 10 or more, whose risk was reduced by 36%. The Objective Response Rate was 51.3% in the Pembrolizumab group and 42.0% in the control group (P=0.00009), and the median Duration of Response was 8.0 months versus 5.7 months, respectively. Immune-related toxicities, especially hypothyroidism, were more common with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and no new safety signals were seen.

It was concluded that treatment with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival and Objective Response Rate, among patients with locally advanced or metastatic, HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal adenocarcinoma of any PD-L1 expression level, thus providing a new treatment option for this patient group.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-859): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Rha SY, Oh D-Y, Yanez P, et al. The Lancet Oncology 2023; 24:1181-1195.

FDA Approves XTANDI® for Non-Metastatic Castrate-Sensitive Prostate Cancer with Biochemical Recurrence

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 16, 2023, approved Enzalutamide (XTANDI®) for non-metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (nmCSPC) with biochemical recurrence, at high risk for metastasis. Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 288,300 new cases of Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and 34,700 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of Prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced Prostate cancer, and is the first treatment intervention.

The major source of PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) is the prostate gland, and the PSA levels are therefore undetectable within 6 weeks after Radical Prostatectomy. Similarly, following Radiation Therapy there is a gradual decline in PSA, before reaching a post treatment nadir. A detectable PSA level after Radical Prostatectomy, or a rising PSA level following Radiation Therapy, is considered PSA failure or biochemical recurrence. Approximately 35% of the patients with prostate cancer will experience PSA only relapse within 10 years of their primary treatment, and a third of these patients will develop documented metastatic disease within 8 years following PSA only relapse. Rising PSA is therefore a sign of recurrent disease. Patients with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer following local therapy, and a short PSA doubling time, are at risk for distant metastases.

Enzalutamide is a potent oral Androgen Receptor signaling inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in patients with both localized and advanced prostate cancer. The present FDA approval is based on results from the EMBARK trial.

EMBARK is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-national, Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Enzalutamide plus Leuprolide and Enzalutamide monotherapy, as compared with Leuprolide alone, in patients with non-metastatic Hormone/Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (nmHSPC or nmCSPC) prostate cancer, who have had high-risk biochemical recurrence. In this study, a total of 1068 eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive Enzalutamide at 160 mg orally once daily plus Leuprolide every 12 weeks (N=355), single agent Enzalutamide at 160 mg orally once daily (N=355) or Leuprolide alone (N=358). All patients had received prior definitive therapy with radical prostatectomy and/or radiotherapy with curative intent. High risk disease was defined as a PSA doubling time of 9 months or less and a PSA level of 2 ng/ml above nadir after radiation therapy, or 1 ng/ml or more after radical prostatectomy with or without postoperative radiation therapy. The baseline characteristics were well balanced among the treatment groups. The median age was 69 years, the median PSA doubling time was 4.9 months and the median PSA level was 5.2 ng/ml. The Primary end point was Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS), as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in the combination group, as compared with the Leuprolide-alone group. MFS is defined as the duration of time in months between randomization and the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression by central imaging or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. A key Secondary end point was Metastasis-Free Survival in the Enzalutamide monotherapy group, as compared with the Leuprolide-alone group. Other Secondary end points were Patient-Reported Outcomes and Safety.

At a median follow up 60.7 months, the 5 year MFS was 87.3% in the Enzalutamide combination group and 71.4% in the Leuprolide-alone group (HR for metastasis or death 0.42; P<0.001). This represented a 58% lower risk of metastasis or death in the combination group than in the leuprolide-alone group. The 5 year MFS with Enzalutamide monotherapy versus Leuprolide alone was 80% versus 71.4% respectively (HR=0.63; P=0.005), suggesting a 37% lower risk of metastasis or death in the Enzalutamide monotherapy group than in the Leuprolide-alone group. At the time of this analysis, Overall Survival data were immature. No new safety signals were reported, and there was no substantial difference in Quality of Life measures between the treatment groups.

It was concluded that in patients with prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence, both Enzalutamide plus Leuprolide and Enzalutamide monotherapy resulted in significantly longer Metastasis-Free Survival and a longer time to PSA progression and receipt of next antineoplastic therapy, compared to Leuprolide alone, while maintaining overall Quality of Life.

Improved Outcomes with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Freedland SJ, de Almeida Luz M, De Giorgi U, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1453-1465.

FDA Approves JAYPIRCA® for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on December 1, 2023, granted accelerated approval to Pirtobrutinib (JAYPIRCA®) for adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, including a BTK inhibitor and a BCL-2 inhibitor. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 18,740 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4490 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children. Patients with CLL often receive continuous therapy with either Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor, time limited therapy with BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax given along with anti-CD20 antibody Obinutuzumab, or under certain circumstances, chemoimmunotherapy.

Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor, and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. BTK inhibitors inhibit cell proliferation and promote programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling. BTK is a validated molecular target found across numerous B-cell leukemias and lymphomas including Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), and Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM).

The 3 covalent BTK inhibitors presently approved by the FDA for CLL/SLL include IMBRUVICA® (Ibrutinib), CALQUENCE® (Acalabrutinib), and BRUKINSA® (Zanubrutinib). Although covalent BTK inhibitors have dramatically improved outcomes for patients with CLL or SLL, they are not curative. Despite the efficacy of covalent BTK inhibitors, treatment failure often occurs through development of resistance or intolerance.

Pirtobrutinib (JAYPIRCA®) is a highly selective, reversible (non-covalent) BTK inhibitor, developed to reversibly bind BTK, deliver consistently high target coverage regardless of BTK turnover rate, and preserve activity in the presence of the C481 acquired resistance mutations. Pirtobrutinib is 300 times more selective in BTK inhibition versus 98% of other kinases tested in preclinical studies, and inhibits both wild type and C481-mutant BTK with equal low nM potency, and has favorable oral pharmacology. Pirtobrutinib is well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with poor-prognosis B-cell malignancies following prior therapy, including prior covalent BTK inhibitors (Mato et al. Lancet, 2021).

The present FDA approval was based on BRUIN trial, which is an open-label, international, single-arm, multicohort, Phase I-II trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Pirtobrutinib in patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-cell cancers. The trial involved patients receiving Pirtobrutinib monotherapy in either the Phase I or Phase II portion. In the Phase I portion, patients received Pirtobrutinib at doses ranging from 25 to 300 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. In the Phase II portion, patients received the recommended dose of 200 mg once daily. Majority of patients (85%) received the recommended dose of 200 mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. This analysis included 247 patients (N=247) with CLL or SLL, who had previously received a BTK inhibitor, among who the median number of previous lines of therapy was 3, and 100 patients (40.5%) had also received a B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor such as Venetoclax. This efficacy cohort (N=247) consisted of 86 patients from the Phase I portion and 161 patients from the Phase II portion. The median age was 69 years and in addition to previous BTK inhibitor therapy and BCL2 inhibitors, patients had also received anti-CD20 antibody (87.9%), chemotherapy (78.9%), PI3K inhibitors (18.2%), Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (5.7%), and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation (2.4%). In those who received previous BTK inhibitor therapy, treatment was discontinued due to disease progression in 77% of patients and 23% discontinued due to toxicities or other reasons. High-risk molecular features were common in this patient group, and when present included the presence of a del(17p) or TP53 mutation or both (46.6%), complex karyotype (42%), and unmutated IGHV (84.8%). The Primary endpoint was Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival and Safety.

Among the patients who had previously received a BTK inhibitor, the ORR with Pirtobrutinib was 73.3% which were mostly Partial Responses. In the subset of patients who had previously received both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL2 inhibitor, the ORR was 70%. In the overall efficacy cohort, the median Progression Free Survival (PFS) at a median follow up of 19.4 months was 19.6 months. The median PFS was 22.1 months among patients who had received a BTK inhibitor but not a BCL2 inhibitor, and the median PFS was 16.8 months in the subset of patients who had previously received both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL2 inhibitor. The most common adverse events were infections, bleeding and neutropenia, and some adverse events that are typically associated with BTK inhibitors such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter and major hemorrhage occurred less frequently, and only 2.8% discontinued Pirtobrutinib due to a treatment-related adverse event.

It was concluded that Pirtobrutinib showed efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated CLL or SLL and these data continue to reinforce the ability of Pirtobrutinib to extend the benefit of BTK inhibition for patients with CLL or SLL, following treatment with a covalent BTK inhibitor.

Pirtobrutinib after a Covalent BTK Inhibitor in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Mato AR, Woyach JA, Brown JR, et al. N Engl J Med 2023;389:33-44.

FDA Approves TRUQAP® with Fulvestrant for Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 16, 2023, approved Capivasertib (TRUQAP®) with Fulvestrant for adult patients with Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with one or more PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-alterations, as detected by an FDA-approved test, following progression on at least one endocrine-based regimen in the metastatic setting or recurrence on or within 12 months of completing adjuvant therapy. FDA also approved the FoundationOne® CDx assay as a companion diagnostic device to identify patients with breast cancer for treatment with Capivasertib with Fulvestrant.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. The most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer is HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (65% of all metastatic breast tumors), and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 36 months. With the development of Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay, for the management of HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, as first line therapy. Even with this therapeutic combination, most patients will eventually experience disease progression due to resistance to endocrine therapy. A therapy overcoming endocrine resistance is an area of active research in the breast cancer space.

The P13K/Akt pathway is a growth-regulating cellular signaling pathway, which in many human cancers is overactivated. Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. A wide range of solid and hematological malignancies show dysregulated PI3K/AKT/mTOR/PTEN signaling due to mutations in the genes involved. Overactivation of the PI3K-AKT-PTEN signaling pathway occurs in approximately 50% of HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers by means of activating mutations in PIK3CA and AKT1 and inactivating alterations in PTEN. These alterations may be present at the time of cancer recurrence, and can also be acquired following previous treatment including with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Further, AKT signaling may also be activated in the absence of genetic alterations in patients with endocrine resistance.

Capivasertib is a novel, first-in-class, orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of the serine/threonine protein kinase AKT (protein kinase B), with potential antineoplastic activity. It is a potent, selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of all three AKT isoforms (AKT1/2/3). By targeting AKT, the key node in the PIK3/AKT signaling network, Capivasertib potentially may be used as monotherapy or combination therapy, for a variety of human cancers. In the Phase II FAKTION trial, Capivasertib in combination with Fulvestrant significantly improved Progression Free and Overall Survival as compared with Fulvestrant alone, among postmenopausal women with HR-positive advanced breast cancer, who had previously received endocrine therapy. The researchers conducted the CAPItello-291 trial to determine whether the addition of Capivasertib to Fulvestrant would improve outcomes in patients with HR-positive breast cancer whose tumors had developed resistance to an Aromatase Inhibitor and CDK4/6 inhibitor.

CAPItello-291 is a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in which 708 adult patients with histologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-low or negative breast cancer, whose disease has recurred or progressed during or after Aromatase Inhibitor therapy, with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant (N=355) arm or the placebo plus Fulvestrant arm (N=353). Patients in the study group received Capivasertib 400 mg orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off along with Fulvestrant 500 mg IM on days 1 and 15 during cycle 1, then every 4 weeks thereafter. The present dosing of Capivasertib was chosen based on tolerability and the degree of target inhibition in early phase trials. The control group received matched placebo along with Fulvestrant. Patients received therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In this trial, patients could have received up to two prior lines of endocrine therapy and up to 1 line of chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Approximately 40% of tumors (N=289) had PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations. Both treatment groups were well balanced. Stratification factors included liver metastases and prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the overall patient population and in a subgroup of patients whose tumors have qualifying alterations in the PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN genes. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR).

The trial met both Primary endpoints, improving PFS in the overall patient population and in a prespecified biomarker subgroup of patients whose tumors had qualifying alterations in the AKT pathway genes. In the overall trial population, patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant had a median PFS of 7.2 months, compared to 3.6 months in patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant (HR=0.60; P<0.001). This amounted to a 40% lower risk of disease progression among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant. Among patients with AKT pathway mutations treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant, the median PFS was 7.3 months versus 3.1 months in the placebo group (HR=0.50; P<0.001), reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 50%, versus placebo plus Fulvestrant. An exploratory analysis of PFS in the 313 patients whose tumors did not have a PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN-alteration showed a HR of 0.79, suggesting that the difference in the overall population was primarily attributed to the results seen in the population of patients whose tumors have PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN-alteration. The benefit from Capivasertib was consistent across key clinically relevant subgroups, including patients previously treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and patients with liver metastases.
The Objective Response Rate in the overall trial population was 22.9% among patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant compared with 12.2% for patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant, and was 28.8% and 9.7% respectively in the biomarker altered population. Although the Overall Survival data were immature at the time of the analysis, early data are encouraging and follow up is ongoing. The most frequent Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurring in 5% or more of patients were diarrhea (9.3%) and rash (12.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 13% among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant versus 2.3% among patients who received placebo plus Fulvestrant.

It was concluded that a combination of Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant is a new treatment option with significantly improved Progression Free Survival, in patients who have Hormone Receptor–positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who had progressed on, or have become resistant to endocrine therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. Turner N, Oliveria M, Howell SJ, et al., for the CAPItello-291 Study Group. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2058-2070.

Osimertinib Plus Chemotherapy Superior to Osimertinib Alone in Advanced EGFR Mutated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 238,340 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 127,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Approximately 10-15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations and 90% of these mutations are either Exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation in Exon 21. Approximately 25% of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC have brain metastases at diagnosis, increasing to approximately 40% within two years of diagnosis. The presence of brain metastases often reduces median survival to less than eight months. EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as TARCEVA® (Erlotinib), IRESSA® (Gefitinib) and GILOTRIF® (Afatinib), have demonstrated a 60-70% response rate as monotherapy when administered as first line treatment, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who harbor the sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, majority of these patients experience disease progression within 9-14 months. This resistance to frontline EGFR TKI therapy has been attributed to the most common, acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation in EGFR, identified in 50-60% of patients.

Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a highly selective third-generation, irreversible Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor TKI, presently approved by the FDA, for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors have Exon 19 deletions or Exon 21 L858R mutations, as well as treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR-TKI therapy. Further, Osimertinib has higher CNS penetration and is therefore able to induce responses in 70-90% of patients with brain metastases.

In the Phase III FLAURA trial, among patients with metastatic, EGFR-mutant NSCLC, first-line treatment with Osimertinib significantly improved median Overall Survival, compared with Erlotinib and Gefitinib, and Osimertinib therefore has been the preferred regimen in this patient group. The FLAURA2 trial builds on the favorable results observed in the Phase III FLAURA trial.
FLAURA2 is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, ongoing Phase III trial, in which 557 enrolled treatment naïve patients (N=557), with nonsquamous locally advanced (Stage IIIB-IIIC) or metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Osimertinib plus chemotherapy (N=279) or Osimertinib monotherapy (N=278). Patients in the combination group received Osimertinib 80 mg oral tablets once daily in combination with chemotherapy consisting of Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV plus Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV or Carboplatin (AUC5), every three weeks for four cycles, followed by Osimertinib with Pemetrexed maintenance every three weeks. The median patient age was 62 years, approximately 62% were women and 64% were Asian. About 61% had Exon 19 deletion and 38% had L858R substitution mutation in Exon 21, 40% had CNS metastases and 53% had extrathoracic metastases. Approximately 76% of patients completed four cycles of platinum therapy. The Primary end point was investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Safety. The median follow-up for progression-free survival was 19.5 months in the osimertinib–chemotherapy group and 16.5 months in the osimertinib group.

In this final analysis of the Primary endpoint of PFS, results from this study showed a significant improvement in PFS with the Osimertinib plus chemotherapy combination versus Osimertinib alone (HR=0.62; P<0.001). The median PFS was 25.5 months versus 16.7 months respectively. This represented a 38% reduction in disease progression risk, compared to Osimertinib monotherapy. The PFS benefit with Osimertinib plus chemotherapy was consistent across prespecified subgroups, including the subgroups defined according to EGFR mutation type and the presence or absence of CNS metastases at baseline. The Objective Response Rate with the combination regimen was 83%, compared to 76%, in the Osimertinib monotherapy group. The median response duration was 24 months and 15.3 months respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination regimen group and were manageable. Data for Overall Survival were immature at the time of the analysis, and this ongoing trial will continue to assess the Secondary endpoint of Overall Survival.

The authors concluded that FLAURA2 provides compelling evidence that the addition of chemotherapy to Osimertinib in the first line treatment of nonsquamous, locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC, can significantly improve outcomes, compared to Osimertinib alone, and can delay resistance to therapy and disease progression.

Osimertinib with or without Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. Planchard D, Jänne PA, Cheng Y, et al. for the FLAURA2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1935-1948

FDA Approves Pembrolizumab with Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on October 31, 2023, approved Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) to be used with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Bile Tract cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) is a rare and highly aggressive heterogenous cancer, and is the second most common type of primary liver cancer after Hepatocellular carcinoma. It comprises about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. It is estimated that approximately 211,000 patients are diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer and 174,000 patients will die of the disease each year globally. Biliary Tract cancer is most frequently diagnosed in patients between 50 to 70 years old, and 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Klatskin tumor is a type of Cholangiocarcinoma that begins in the hilum, at the junction of the left and right bile ducts. It is the most common type of Cholangiocarcinoma, accounting for more than half of all cases. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma each year and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection. Patients diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer have a very poor prognosis, and the 5-year survival among those with advanced stage disease is less than 10%, with limited progress made over the past two decades. There is therefore an urgent unmet need for new effective therapies.

Patients with advanced Biliary Tract cancers often receive chemotherapy in the first and second line settings, with limited benefit. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination is currently the first line standard-of-care treatment. With the recognition of immunogenic features displayed by Biliary Tract cancers, the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for improving disease control and prolonging survival has been increasingly explored.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

KEYNOTE-966 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, conducted to determine whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab to first line standard chemotherapy, would impact survival outcomes in patients with metastatic or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers. In this study, 1069 patients (N=1069) with advanced and/or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers were randomly assigned to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (N=533) or placebo (N=536). Both treatment groups received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks without preset maximum number of cycles, and Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles. The median age was 63.5 years, majority of patients had metastatic disease (88%) and more than half had intrahepatic disease. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response and Safety. The median follow up was 25.6 months.

The median OS was 12.7 months in the Pembrolizumab group and 10.9 months in the placebo group (HR=0.83; P=0.0034). This represented a 17% reduction in the risk of death in the Pembrolizumab group compared to the placebo group. The 12-month OS rate was 52% with the Pembrolizumab regimen versus 44% for chemotherapy alone and the 24-month OS rates were 24.9% versus 18.1%, respectively. The OS results were generally consistent across subgroups.

There was no significant difference in PFS between the treatment groups but there was a trend toward improved PFS with Pembrolizumab. The median PFS was 6.5 months in the Pembrolizumab arm and 5.6 months in the placebo group (HR=0.87; P=0.23). The estimated 12-month PFS was 25% and 20% respectively.The Objective Response Rates were similar between the two treatment groups – 28.7% in the Pembrolizumab group and 28.5% in the placebo arm.The safety profile of Pembrolizumab was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies and Grade 3-4 adverse events were similar between treatment groups.

The authors concluded that KEYNOTE-966 is the largest randomized Phase III trial in advanced Biliary Tract cancers to date, with more patients enrolled from non-Asian countries. First line treatment with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved Overall Survival, when compared with chemotherapy alone. The researchers added that one of the limitations of this study is that patients with intrahepatic bile duct cancers were overrepresented in the study population compared with the incidence of the disease in the general population, resulting in smaller sample sizes of patients with extrahepatic and gall bladder sites of origin.

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al. The Lancet. 2023;401:1853-1865.

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2023: WELIREG® Significantly Improves Outcomes in Advanced Pretreated Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 81,800 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2023 and about 14,890 people will die from this disease. Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five-year survival of patients with advanced RCC is about 14% and there is a significant need for improved therapies for this disease.

Patients with advanced RCC are often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, either in combination or sequentially. However upon progression on these therapies, there are limited treatment options and there is an unmet medical need.

The VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau) protein is a tumor suppressor gene located on the short arm of chromosome 3p. It is frequently mutated and inactivated in approximately 90% of clear cell Renal Cell Carcinomas (ccRCC). The VHL gene under normal conditions binds to Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) and facilitates degradation of this factor. Under hypoxic conditions and in patients having biallelic loss of function and mutation of VHL genes, HIFs are not degraded. High HIF levels and subsequent overproduction of VEGF, PDGF and TGF-alpha, resulting in increased angiogenesis, increased tumor cell proliferation and survival, as well as metastasis.

Belzutifan (WELIREG®) is a a first-in-class, oral, HIF-2alfa inhibitor approved in the US for adult patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease who require therapy for associated Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemangioblastomas, or Pancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (pNET), not requiring immediate surgery. This approval was based on the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) data from the Phase II LITESPARK-004 trial.

LITESPARK-005 is a randomized, open-label, Phase III trial in which Belzutifan was compared with Everolimus in pretreated advanced ccRCC. In this study, 746 enrolled patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma whose disease progressed after treatment with both an immune checkpoint inhibitor, such as a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, and VEGF-TKI, in sequence or in combination, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either Belzutifan 120 mg orally daily (N=374) or Everolimus 10 mg orally daily (N=372), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BICR and Safety.

At the first pre-specified interim analysis at a median follow up of 18.4 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 25% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.75; P<0.001). The results at the second pre-specified interim analysis were consistent with first interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 25.7 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 26% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.74; P<0.001). The estimated 12-month PFS rate was 33.7% for patients who received Belzutifan versus 17.6% for patients who received Everolimus, and the estimated 18-month PFS rate was 22.5% and 9.0%, respectively. The Overall Survival data favored Belzutifan compared to Everolimus at both the first and second interim analysis, but did not reach statistical significance and will be tested at a subsequent analysis.

There was a statistically significant improvement in ORR at both the first and second interim analysis, and the ORR was 22.7% with a Complete Response rate 3.5% for patients who received Belzutifan versus an ORR of 3.5% with no patients achieving a Complete Response for patients who received Everolimus (P<0.00001). The time to response with Belzutifan was about three months. Quality of Life favored Belzutifan.

Treatment-related adverse events and in particular Grade 3 adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 5.9% of patients who received Belzutifan and 14.7% among those who received Everolimus. The most common side effects associated with Belzutifan were anemia, fatigue, nausea, constipation, peripheral edema, dyspnea and arthralgia.

It was concluded that Belzutifan was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Progression Free Survival and Overall Response Rate compared to Everolimus in patients with advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, after immune checkpoint and anti-angiogenic therapies. They added that this is the first Phase III trial to show positive results in advanced RCC following standard therapies and the first drug with a new mechanism of action to demonstrate efficacy in this group of patients.

Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Randomized open-label phase III LITESPARK-005 study. Albiges L, Rini BI, Peltola K, et al. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.090. LBA88