SUMMARY: Mantle cell lymphomas constitute approximately 5% of all Non Hodgkins lymphomas and have a high relapse rate following dose-intensive therapies. Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is approved for the treatment of relapsed mantle cell myeloma (MCL) and has a response rate of 30%. This open label, phase II trial, evaluated the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®) in 134 patients with MCL who have had prior therapy with Rituximab (RITUXAN®), Cyclophosphamide, Anthracycline and had relapsed or progressed in less than 12 months or were refractory to VELCADE®. Patients had a median of 4 prior treatments. Treatment consisted of single agent REVLIMID® 25 mg/day given on days 1 thru 21 of a 28-day cycle, given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. The secondary endpoints included complete response (CR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), time to progression, overall survival (OS) and safety. In this heavily pretreated patient population the ORR was 28% and the median duration of response of 16.6 months. The CR was 8%, PFS was 4.0 months, and OS was 19.0 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were cytopenias. The authors concluded that REVLIMID® resulted in rapid and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Goy A, Sinha R, Williams ME, et al. 54th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition 2012, Abstract 905
Category: Hem/Onc Updates
Results of a randomized phase 2 study of PD 0332991, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, in combination with letrozole vs letrozole alone for first-line treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (BC)
SUMMARY: PD 0332991 is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4/6 kinases. This agent interrupts cellular DNA synthesis by inhibiting the progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase and thus prevents tumor cell growth. The results presented, includes the pooled data from the study of 2 cohorts of patients. Both groups included postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer and ER positive, HER2 negative tumors. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either letrozole (FEMARA®) along with PD 0332991 or FEMARA® alone. Group 1 enrolled 66 patients and Group 2 enrolled 99 patients. Group 2 patient tumors were also evaluated for the biomarkers cyclinD1 amplification and/or loss of p16, by FISH analysis. For both these study groups, the primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included response rates, overall survival, safety, and biomarker correlates. Data from the pooled analysis which included 165 women from both the groups demonstrated a median PFS of 26.1 months for the combination compared to 7.5 months with FEMARA® alone. This represented a 63% reduction in risk of progression (hazard ratio =0.37; P < 001). The most common adverse events noted in the combination group included uncomplicated neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue. Biomarkers expression (cyclinD1 amplification and/or loss of p16) had no impact on outcomes suggesting that the biomarker for PD0332991 may be the estrogen receptor itself rather than CDK4/6 kinases. Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2012; Abstract S1-6.
Prospective study of treatment pattern, effectiveness, and safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) therapy beyond 24 months subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic bone disease (MBD) from breast cancer (BC)
SUMMARY:There is not much data on the effectiveness and safety of Zoledronic acid (ZOMETA®) beyond 2 years. Two studies one from Belgium and the other from Japan shed some light on this issue. In the prospective multicenter Belgian trial, 108 women with breast cancer prior to enrollment had received at least 24 months of therapy with ZOMETA® infusions given every 3 to 4 weeks and 21% had received at least 48 months of therapy. They were followed for 18 months and monitored for Skeletal Related Events (SRE’s), Osteo Necrosis of the Jaw bone (ONJ), renal failure and hypocalcemia. During this follow up period, SRE’s were low and 83% of the women were free of SRE’s. ONJ was seen in 7 patients (4.5%). The rate of ONJ however rose to 11% after any invasive dental procedure. The risk of renal failure was low but increased to 12%when the dose of ZOMETA® was not adjusted for renal function. The Japanese study was a retrospective analysis of 83 patients who had been treated with ZOMETA® for at least 24 months (median 33 months). SRE’s were low and the frequency of ONJ was 3.6% compared to 2.4% for those patients who had been ZOMETA® for shorter periods. Both these studies demonstrated that longer duration of therapy with ZOMETA® resulted in increased rate of ONJ. Therefore, particular attention should be paid to prevent this complication by adhering to proper dental hygiene and avoiding dental trauma and extractions. Van den Wyngaert T, Delforge M, Doyen C, et al. and Suzuki Y, Saito Y, Ogiya R, et al. CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2012; Poster P3-13-01 and P3-13-02.
Final analysis of overall survival for the phase III CONFIRM trial fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg
SUMMARY: Fulvestrant (FASOLODEX®) is an Estrogen Receptor (ER) antagonist and downregulates the cellular levels of ER in a dose-dependent manner. The CONFIRM trial is a phase III study in which postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive advanced breast cancer, who had progressed after prior endocrine therapy, were randomized to be treated with either FASLODEX® 500 mg (n=362) or FASLODEX® 250 mg (n=374) every 28 days. The primary end point for this study was Progression Free Survival (PFS). In the primary analysis, FASLODEX® 500 mg was associated with a statistically significant increase in PFS compared with FASLODEX® 250 mg. Even though there was a trend towards improved overall survival (OS) with the higher dose, this was not statistically significant. In the updated second survival analysis presented at this symposium, the median OS trend prevailed with FASLODEX® 500mg compared with FASLODEX® 250mg, given every 28 days (26.4 months vs 22.3 months, P=0.16). This translated into a 4 month increase in median overall survival and a 19% reduction in the risk of death. The authors concluded that the higher dose of FASLODEX® may indeed confer some survival benefit to this patient subsets. Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2012; Abstract S1-4.
Neurocognitive impact in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer linked to fatigue a prospective functional MRI study
SUMMARY: Cognitive impairment in patients with breast cancer has been frequently attributed to chemotherapy (Chemo Brain) without any data supporting this hypothesis. Utilizing functional magnetic resonance imaging, brain function was tested while the patients were performing a working memory task in the scanner, before adjuvant treatment and then one month after adjuvant treatment. Sixty six breast cancer patients with Stages 0-IIIA were studied and their cognitive function was compared with 32 healthy controls. Patients on treatment were receiving either an anthracyline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (n = 29) or radiotherapy (n = 37). Patients self-reported on levels of cognitive functioning and fatigue after each imaging study. Pretreatment brain imaging revealed decreased functioning in the frontal lobe of the brain (responsible for memory and cognition), compared to the controls and this cognitive impairment was most severe in patients awaiting chemotherapy, whereas the radiotherapy group fell between the pre-chemotherapy and control group. Of Interest, the decreased functioning in the frontal lobe area before treatment predicted the severity of fatigue. Further, those with greater fatigue experienced greater cognitive impairment over time. The authors concluded that the cognitive problems are probably related to worry and fatigue prior to treatment intervention rather than the treatment itself. They recommend identifying patients at risk and early intervention. Cimprich B, Hayes DF, Askren MK, et al. CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2012; Abstract S6-3.
ATLAS 10 v 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) in ER+ disease effects on outcome in the first and in the second decade after diagnosis
SUMMARY: Historically, adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen beyond five years has not been recommended, as the benefit of tamoxifen beyond five years was unknown but there was an increased risk of endometrial cancer. (Tamoxifen Treatment for Breast Cancer and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Case-Control Study, J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 375-384). The ATLAS trial has now shed some light on the duration of tamoxifen treatment. In this study, 6846 women with ER positive breast cancer were enrolled between 1996 and 2005 and following five years of adjuvant tamoxifen were randomized to five additional years of tamoxifen or observation. Women who continued on tamoxifen had a 25% lower recurrence rate and 29% lower breast cancer mortality rate compared with women who stopped tamoxifen after five years. This significant benefit was seen in the second decade after diagnosis with little benefit seen in the 5-9 year period after diagnosis. There was a higher cumulative risk of death from endometrial cancer for those who continued tamoxifen beyond 5 years compared to those who did not (0.4% vs 0.2%). It appears that the reduction in breast cancer deaths outweigh the risk of endometrial cancer and other adverse events associated with longer duration of tamoxifen use. This new information will help physicians make appropriate treatment recommendations for those patients on adjuvant tamoxifen. Davis C, Hongchao P, Godwin J, et al. CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2012; Abstract S1-2.
Chemotherapy prolongs survival for isolated local or regional recurrence of breast cancer the CALOR trial (Chemotherapy as Adjuvant for Locally Recurrent breast cancer; IBCSG 27-02, NSABP B-37, BIG 1-02)
SUMMARY: Approximately 5% to 15% of all breast cancer patients present with local and/or regional recurrences. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of an isolated recurrence of breast cancer is unknown. To address this, in the CALOR trial, 162 patients with recurrent tumors underwent surgery and were then randomized to receive either four cycles of a multidrug chemotherapy regimen of investigator’s choice (n=85) or observation (n=77). The median age was 56 years. The treatment groups were well balanced and 68% and 58% of patients in the observation and treatment arms respectively received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. The median time to recurrence was 5 years in the treatment group and 6 years in the observation group. The primary end point was disease free survival (DFS). The 5-year DFS rate for the chemotherapy group and observation group was 69% vs 57% respectively. This translated into a relative risk reduction of 41% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; P = 0.045). The 5-year overall survival rate between the chemotherapy group and observation group was 88% vs 76% with a 59% reduction in the relative risk for death for patients treated with chemotherapy (HR, 0.41; P = 0.02). In patients with ER-negative tumors, the 5-year DFS was 67% in the treatment arm versus 35% in the control group (HR = 0.32; P = 0.007). This data supports the role of chemotherapy for patients with completely resected isolated locoregional recurrences of breast cancer. Aebi S, Gelber S, Láng I, et al. Presented at: CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2012. Abstract S3-2.
PX-171-003-A1, an open-label, single-arm, phase (Ph) II study of carfilzomib (CFZ) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) Long-term follow-up and subgroup analysis
SUMMARY: KYPROLIS® (Carfilzomib) is a second generation proteasome inhibitor. Unlike VELCADE® (Bortezomib), proteasome inhibition with KYPROLIS® is irreversible. The approval of KYPROLIS® was based on a phase 2b, single-arm, multicenter clinical study in which 266 patients with advanced refractory Multiple Myeloma who had progressed on 2 or more prior therapies were evaluated. Prior therapies included treatment with VELCADE® (Bortezomib), REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide) or THALOMID® (Thalidomide). The primary end point was Overall Response Rate (ORR). The ORR with single agent KYPROLIS® was 24%, with a median duration of response of 7.4 months. This benefit was seen regardless of unfavorable cytogenetics. Peripheral neuropathy was infrequent and the most common adverse events were primarily hematologic. Patients with resistant and refractory Multiple Myeloma now have a new treatment option after a six year hiatus. Siegel DSD, Martin T, Wang M, et al. J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 8027)
FDA approves STIVARGA® (Regorafenib) for Advanced Colorectal Cancer
SUMMARY: The FDA approved STIVARGA® (Regorafenib), an oral multi-kinase inhibitor for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have progressed on 5FU, ELOXATIN® (Oxaliplatin), CAMPTOSAR® (Irinotecan), anti- VEGF and anti-EGFR therapies. The approval was based on a phase III trial in which 760 patients with metastatic CRC who had progressed after approved standard therapies, were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either STIVARGA® plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. Patients receiving STIVARGA® had a statistically significant improvement in the overall survival and progression free survival compared to placebo, without any unexpected toxicities. The most common side effects of STIVARGA® were fatigue, loss of appetite, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, mucositis, elevated blood pressure, and dysphonia. This important study gives a new option for individuals with advanced colorectal cancer. Grothey A, F. Sobrero AF, Siena S, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 4; abstr LBA385)
Bosutinib as third-line therapy for chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) following failure with imatinib and dasatinib or nilotinib
SUMMARY: BOSULIF® (Bosutinib), an Abl and Src kinase inhibitor was approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with chronic, accelerated, or blast phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) with resistance, or intolerance to prior therapy. This trial included CML patients treated with imatinib followed by a second generation TKI. Five hundred and forty six (546) patients were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label, multi-center trial and these patients had either chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) CML and were previously treated with at least one prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The primary endpoints for patients with CP CML were the rate of major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at week 24 and the duration of MCyR. The primary endpoints for patients with AP or BP CML were the rate of confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR) and overall hematologic response (OHR) by week 48. The MCyR at week 24 was 34% for those CP CML patients who received prior therapy with one TKI and 27% for those who received prior therapy with more than one TKI. The duration of MCyR among 53% of the patients who achieved MCyR at any time during the trial was 18 months, for patients with CP CML who had been treated with one prior TKI. For those CP CML patients treated with more than one TKI, the duration of MCyR among 51% of the patients who achieved MCyR at any time during the trial was 9 months. The CHR and OHR for AP CML who received at least one prior TKI were 30% and 55% respectively at week 48 whereas the BP CML group had a CHR and OHR of 15% and 28% respectively at week 48. BOSULIF® will be a welcome addition for those CML patients who had progressed on one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Brummendorf TH, Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, et al. J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 6535)