Category: Hem/Onc Updates

FDA Approves JAYPIRCA® for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on December 1, 2023, granted accelerated approval to Pirtobrutinib (JAYPIRCA®) for adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, including a BTK inhibitor and a BCL-2 inhibitor. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 18,740 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4490 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children. Patients with CLL often receive continuous therapy with either Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor, time limited therapy with BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax given along with anti-CD20 antibody Obinutuzumab, or under certain circumstances, chemoimmunotherapy.

Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor, and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. BTK inhibitors inhibit cell proliferation and promote programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling. BTK is a validated molecular target found across numerous B-cell leukemias and lymphomas including Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), and Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM).

The 3 covalent BTK inhibitors presently approved by the FDA for CLL/SLL include IMBRUVICA® (Ibrutinib), CALQUENCE® (Acalabrutinib), and BRUKINSA® (Zanubrutinib). Although covalent BTK inhibitors have dramatically improved outcomes for patients with CLL or SLL, they are not curative. Despite the efficacy of covalent BTK inhibitors, treatment failure often occurs through development of resistance or intolerance.

Pirtobrutinib (JAYPIRCA®) is a highly selective, reversible (non-covalent) BTK inhibitor, developed to reversibly bind BTK, deliver consistently high target coverage regardless of BTK turnover rate, and preserve activity in the presence of the C481 acquired resistance mutations. Pirtobrutinib is 300 times more selective in BTK inhibition versus 98% of other kinases tested in preclinical studies, and inhibits both wild type and C481-mutant BTK with equal low nM potency, and has favorable oral pharmacology. Pirtobrutinib is well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with poor-prognosis B-cell malignancies following prior therapy, including prior covalent BTK inhibitors (Mato et al. Lancet, 2021).

The present FDA approval was based on BRUIN trial, which is an open-label, international, single-arm, multicohort, Phase I-II trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Pirtobrutinib in patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-cell cancers. The trial involved patients receiving Pirtobrutinib monotherapy in either the Phase I or Phase II portion. In the Phase I portion, patients received Pirtobrutinib at doses ranging from 25 to 300 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. In the Phase II portion, patients received the recommended dose of 200 mg once daily. Majority of patients (85%) received the recommended dose of 200 mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. This analysis included 247 patients (N=247) with CLL or SLL, who had previously received a BTK inhibitor, among who the median number of previous lines of therapy was 3, and 100 patients (40.5%) had also received a B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor such as Venetoclax. This efficacy cohort (N=247) consisted of 86 patients from the Phase I portion and 161 patients from the Phase II portion. The median age was 69 years and in addition to previous BTK inhibitor therapy and BCL2 inhibitors, patients had also received anti-CD20 antibody (87.9%), chemotherapy (78.9%), PI3K inhibitors (18.2%), Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (5.7%), and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation (2.4%). In those who received previous BTK inhibitor therapy, treatment was discontinued due to disease progression in 77% of patients and 23% discontinued due to toxicities or other reasons. High-risk molecular features were common in this patient group, and when present included the presence of a del(17p) or TP53 mutation or both (46.6%), complex karyotype (42%), and unmutated IGHV (84.8%). The Primary endpoint was Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival and Safety.

Among the patients who had previously received a BTK inhibitor, the ORR with Pirtobrutinib was 73.3% which were mostly Partial Responses. In the subset of patients who had previously received both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL2 inhibitor, the ORR was 70%. In the overall efficacy cohort, the median Progression Free Survival (PFS) at a median follow up of 19.4 months was 19.6 months. The median PFS was 22.1 months among patients who had received a BTK inhibitor but not a BCL2 inhibitor, and the median PFS was 16.8 months in the subset of patients who had previously received both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL2 inhibitor. The most common adverse events were infections, bleeding and neutropenia, and some adverse events that are typically associated with BTK inhibitors such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter and major hemorrhage occurred less frequently, and only 2.8% discontinued Pirtobrutinib due to a treatment-related adverse event.

It was concluded that Pirtobrutinib showed efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated CLL or SLL and these data continue to reinforce the ability of Pirtobrutinib to extend the benefit of BTK inhibition for patients with CLL or SLL, following treatment with a covalent BTK inhibitor.

Pirtobrutinib after a Covalent BTK Inhibitor in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Mato AR, Woyach JA, Brown JR, et al. N Engl J Med 2023;389:33-44.

FDA Approves TRUQAP® with Fulvestrant for Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 16, 2023, approved Capivasertib (TRUQAP®) with Fulvestrant for adult patients with Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with one or more PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-alterations, as detected by an FDA-approved test, following progression on at least one endocrine-based regimen in the metastatic setting or recurrence on or within 12 months of completing adjuvant therapy. FDA also approved the FoundationOne® CDx assay as a companion diagnostic device to identify patients with breast cancer for treatment with Capivasertib with Fulvestrant.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. The most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer is HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (65% of all metastatic breast tumors), and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 36 months. With the development of Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay, for the management of HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, as first line therapy. Even with this therapeutic combination, most patients will eventually experience disease progression due to resistance to endocrine therapy. A therapy overcoming endocrine resistance is an area of active research in the breast cancer space.

The P13K/Akt pathway is a growth-regulating cellular signaling pathway, which in many human cancers is overactivated. Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. A wide range of solid and hematological malignancies show dysregulated PI3K/AKT/mTOR/PTEN signaling due to mutations in the genes involved. Overactivation of the PI3K-AKT-PTEN signaling pathway occurs in approximately 50% of HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers by means of activating mutations in PIK3CA and AKT1 and inactivating alterations in PTEN. These alterations may be present at the time of cancer recurrence, and can also be acquired following previous treatment including with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Further, AKT signaling may also be activated in the absence of genetic alterations in patients with endocrine resistance.

Capivasertib is a novel, first-in-class, orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of the serine/threonine protein kinase AKT (protein kinase B), with potential antineoplastic activity. It is a potent, selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of all three AKT isoforms (AKT1/2/3). By targeting AKT, the key node in the PIK3/AKT signaling network, Capivasertib potentially may be used as monotherapy or combination therapy, for a variety of human cancers. In the Phase II FAKTION trial, Capivasertib in combination with Fulvestrant significantly improved Progression Free and Overall Survival as compared with Fulvestrant alone, among postmenopausal women with HR-positive advanced breast cancer, who had previously received endocrine therapy. The researchers conducted the CAPItello-291 trial to determine whether the addition of Capivasertib to Fulvestrant would improve outcomes in patients with HR-positive breast cancer whose tumors had developed resistance to an Aromatase Inhibitor and CDK4/6 inhibitor.

CAPItello-291 is a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in which 708 adult patients with histologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-low or negative breast cancer, whose disease has recurred or progressed during or after Aromatase Inhibitor therapy, with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant (N=355) arm or the placebo plus Fulvestrant arm (N=353). Patients in the study group received Capivasertib 400 mg orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off along with Fulvestrant 500 mg IM on days 1 and 15 during cycle 1, then every 4 weeks thereafter. The present dosing of Capivasertib was chosen based on tolerability and the degree of target inhibition in early phase trials. The control group received matched placebo along with Fulvestrant. Patients received therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In this trial, patients could have received up to two prior lines of endocrine therapy and up to 1 line of chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Approximately 40% of tumors (N=289) had PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations. Both treatment groups were well balanced. Stratification factors included liver metastases and prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the overall patient population and in a subgroup of patients whose tumors have qualifying alterations in the PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN genes. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR).

The trial met both Primary endpoints, improving PFS in the overall patient population and in a prespecified biomarker subgroup of patients whose tumors had qualifying alterations in the AKT pathway genes. In the overall trial population, patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant had a median PFS of 7.2 months, compared to 3.6 months in patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant (HR=0.60; P<0.001). This amounted to a 40% lower risk of disease progression among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant. Among patients with AKT pathway mutations treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant, the median PFS was 7.3 months versus 3.1 months in the placebo group (HR=0.50; P<0.001), reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 50%, versus placebo plus Fulvestrant. An exploratory analysis of PFS in the 313 patients whose tumors did not have a PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN-alteration showed a HR of 0.79, suggesting that the difference in the overall population was primarily attributed to the results seen in the population of patients whose tumors have PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN-alteration. The benefit from Capivasertib was consistent across key clinically relevant subgroups, including patients previously treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and patients with liver metastases.
The Objective Response Rate in the overall trial population was 22.9% among patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant compared with 12.2% for patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant, and was 28.8% and 9.7% respectively in the biomarker altered population. Although the Overall Survival data were immature at the time of the analysis, early data are encouraging and follow up is ongoing. The most frequent Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurring in 5% or more of patients were diarrhea (9.3%) and rash (12.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 13% among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant versus 2.3% among patients who received placebo plus Fulvestrant.

It was concluded that a combination of Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant is a new treatment option with significantly improved Progression Free Survival, in patients who have Hormone Receptor–positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who had progressed on, or have become resistant to endocrine therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. Turner N, Oliveria M, Howell SJ, et al., for the CAPItello-291 Study Group. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2058-2070.

Osimertinib Plus Chemotherapy Superior to Osimertinib Alone in Advanced EGFR Mutated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 238,340 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 127,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Approximately 10-15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations and 90% of these mutations are either Exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation in Exon 21. Approximately 25% of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC have brain metastases at diagnosis, increasing to approximately 40% within two years of diagnosis. The presence of brain metastases often reduces median survival to less than eight months. EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as TARCEVA® (Erlotinib), IRESSA® (Gefitinib) and GILOTRIF® (Afatinib), have demonstrated a 60-70% response rate as monotherapy when administered as first line treatment, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who harbor the sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, majority of these patients experience disease progression within 9-14 months. This resistance to frontline EGFR TKI therapy has been attributed to the most common, acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation in EGFR, identified in 50-60% of patients.

Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a highly selective third-generation, irreversible Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor TKI, presently approved by the FDA, for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors have Exon 19 deletions or Exon 21 L858R mutations, as well as treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR-TKI therapy. Further, Osimertinib has higher CNS penetration and is therefore able to induce responses in 70-90% of patients with brain metastases.

In the Phase III FLAURA trial, among patients with metastatic, EGFR-mutant NSCLC, first-line treatment with Osimertinib significantly improved median Overall Survival, compared with Erlotinib and Gefitinib, and Osimertinib therefore has been the preferred regimen in this patient group. The FLAURA2 trial builds on the favorable results observed in the Phase III FLAURA trial.
FLAURA2 is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, ongoing Phase III trial, in which 557 enrolled treatment naïve patients (N=557), with nonsquamous locally advanced (Stage IIIB-IIIC) or metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Osimertinib plus chemotherapy (N=279) or Osimertinib monotherapy (N=278). Patients in the combination group received Osimertinib 80 mg oral tablets once daily in combination with chemotherapy consisting of Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV plus Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV or Carboplatin (AUC5), every three weeks for four cycles, followed by Osimertinib with Pemetrexed maintenance every three weeks. The median patient age was 62 years, approximately 62% were women and 64% were Asian. About 61% had Exon 19 deletion and 38% had L858R substitution mutation in Exon 21, 40% had CNS metastases and 53% had extrathoracic metastases. Approximately 76% of patients completed four cycles of platinum therapy. The Primary end point was investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Safety. The median follow-up for progression-free survival was 19.5 months in the osimertinib–chemotherapy group and 16.5 months in the osimertinib group.

In this final analysis of the Primary endpoint of PFS, results from this study showed a significant improvement in PFS with the Osimertinib plus chemotherapy combination versus Osimertinib alone (HR=0.62; P<0.001). The median PFS was 25.5 months versus 16.7 months respectively. This represented a 38% reduction in disease progression risk, compared to Osimertinib monotherapy. The PFS benefit with Osimertinib plus chemotherapy was consistent across prespecified subgroups, including the subgroups defined according to EGFR mutation type and the presence or absence of CNS metastases at baseline. The Objective Response Rate with the combination regimen was 83%, compared to 76%, in the Osimertinib monotherapy group. The median response duration was 24 months and 15.3 months respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination regimen group and were manageable. Data for Overall Survival were immature at the time of the analysis, and this ongoing trial will continue to assess the Secondary endpoint of Overall Survival.

The authors concluded that FLAURA2 provides compelling evidence that the addition of chemotherapy to Osimertinib in the first line treatment of nonsquamous, locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC, can significantly improve outcomes, compared to Osimertinib alone, and can delay resistance to therapy and disease progression.

Osimertinib with or without Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. Planchard D, Jänne PA, Cheng Y, et al. for the FLAURA2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1935-1948

FDA Approves Pembrolizumab with Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on October 31, 2023, approved Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) to be used with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Bile Tract cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) is a rare and highly aggressive heterogenous cancer, and is the second most common type of primary liver cancer after Hepatocellular carcinoma. It comprises about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. It is estimated that approximately 211,000 patients are diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer and 174,000 patients will die of the disease each year globally. Biliary Tract cancer is most frequently diagnosed in patients between 50 to 70 years old, and 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Klatskin tumor is a type of Cholangiocarcinoma that begins in the hilum, at the junction of the left and right bile ducts. It is the most common type of Cholangiocarcinoma, accounting for more than half of all cases. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma each year and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection. Patients diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer have a very poor prognosis, and the 5-year survival among those with advanced stage disease is less than 10%, with limited progress made over the past two decades. There is therefore an urgent unmet need for new effective therapies.

Patients with advanced Biliary Tract cancers often receive chemotherapy in the first and second line settings, with limited benefit. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination is currently the first line standard-of-care treatment. With the recognition of immunogenic features displayed by Biliary Tract cancers, the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for improving disease control and prolonging survival has been increasingly explored.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

KEYNOTE-966 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, conducted to determine whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab to first line standard chemotherapy, would impact survival outcomes in patients with metastatic or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers. In this study, 1069 patients (N=1069) with advanced and/or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers were randomly assigned to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (N=533) or placebo (N=536). Both treatment groups received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks without preset maximum number of cycles, and Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles. The median age was 63.5 years, majority of patients had metastatic disease (88%) and more than half had intrahepatic disease. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response and Safety. The median follow up was 25.6 months.

The median OS was 12.7 months in the Pembrolizumab group and 10.9 months in the placebo group (HR=0.83; P=0.0034). This represented a 17% reduction in the risk of death in the Pembrolizumab group compared to the placebo group. The 12-month OS rate was 52% with the Pembrolizumab regimen versus 44% for chemotherapy alone and the 24-month OS rates were 24.9% versus 18.1%, respectively. The OS results were generally consistent across subgroups.

There was no significant difference in PFS between the treatment groups but there was a trend toward improved PFS with Pembrolizumab. The median PFS was 6.5 months in the Pembrolizumab arm and 5.6 months in the placebo group (HR=0.87; P=0.23). The estimated 12-month PFS was 25% and 20% respectively.The Objective Response Rates were similar between the two treatment groups – 28.7% in the Pembrolizumab group and 28.5% in the placebo arm.The safety profile of Pembrolizumab was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies and Grade 3-4 adverse events were similar between treatment groups.

The authors concluded that KEYNOTE-966 is the largest randomized Phase III trial in advanced Biliary Tract cancers to date, with more patients enrolled from non-Asian countries. First line treatment with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved Overall Survival, when compared with chemotherapy alone. The researchers added that one of the limitations of this study is that patients with intrahepatic bile duct cancers were overrepresented in the study population compared with the incidence of the disease in the general population, resulting in smaller sample sizes of patients with extrahepatic and gall bladder sites of origin.

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al. The Lancet. 2023;401:1853-1865.

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2023: WELIREG® Significantly Improves Outcomes in Advanced Pretreated Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 81,800 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2023 and about 14,890 people will die from this disease. Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five-year survival of patients with advanced RCC is about 14% and there is a significant need for improved therapies for this disease.

Patients with advanced RCC are often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, either in combination or sequentially. However upon progression on these therapies, there are limited treatment options and there is an unmet medical need.

The VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau) protein is a tumor suppressor gene located on the short arm of chromosome 3p. It is frequently mutated and inactivated in approximately 90% of clear cell Renal Cell Carcinomas (ccRCC). The VHL gene under normal conditions binds to Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) and facilitates degradation of this factor. Under hypoxic conditions and in patients having biallelic loss of function and mutation of VHL genes, HIFs are not degraded. High HIF levels and subsequent overproduction of VEGF, PDGF and TGF-alpha, resulting in increased angiogenesis, increased tumor cell proliferation and survival, as well as metastasis.

Belzutifan (WELIREG®) is a a first-in-class, oral, HIF-2alfa inhibitor approved in the US for adult patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease who require therapy for associated Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemangioblastomas, or Pancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (pNET), not requiring immediate surgery. This approval was based on the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) data from the Phase II LITESPARK-004 trial.

LITESPARK-005 is a randomized, open-label, Phase III trial in which Belzutifan was compared with Everolimus in pretreated advanced ccRCC. In this study, 746 enrolled patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma whose disease progressed after treatment with both an immune checkpoint inhibitor, such as a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, and VEGF-TKI, in sequence or in combination, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either Belzutifan 120 mg orally daily (N=374) or Everolimus 10 mg orally daily (N=372), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BICR and Safety.

At the first pre-specified interim analysis at a median follow up of 18.4 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 25% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.75; P<0.001). The results at the second pre-specified interim analysis were consistent with first interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 25.7 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 26% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.74; P<0.001). The estimated 12-month PFS rate was 33.7% for patients who received Belzutifan versus 17.6% for patients who received Everolimus, and the estimated 18-month PFS rate was 22.5% and 9.0%, respectively. The Overall Survival data favored Belzutifan compared to Everolimus at both the first and second interim analysis, but did not reach statistical significance and will be tested at a subsequent analysis.

There was a statistically significant improvement in ORR at both the first and second interim analysis, and the ORR was 22.7% with a Complete Response rate 3.5% for patients who received Belzutifan versus an ORR of 3.5% with no patients achieving a Complete Response for patients who received Everolimus (P<0.00001). The time to response with Belzutifan was about three months. Quality of Life favored Belzutifan.

Treatment-related adverse events and in particular Grade 3 adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 5.9% of patients who received Belzutifan and 14.7% among those who received Everolimus. The most common side effects associated with Belzutifan were anemia, fatigue, nausea, constipation, peripheral edema, dyspnea and arthralgia.

It was concluded that Belzutifan was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Progression Free Survival and Overall Response Rate compared to Everolimus in patients with advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, after immune checkpoint and anti-angiogenic therapies. They added that this is the first Phase III trial to show positive results in advanced RCC following standard therapies and the first drug with a new mechanism of action to demonstrate efficacy in this group of patients.

Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Randomized open-label phase III LITESPARK-005 study. Albiges L, Rini BI, Peltola K, et al. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.090. LBA88

FDA Approves Fruquintinib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 8, 2023, approved Fruquintinib (FRUZAQLA®) for adult patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) who received prior Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-VEGF therapy, and, if RAS wild-type and medically appropriate, an anti-EGFR therapy. Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 153,020 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2023 and about 52,550 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

Approximately 15-25% of the patients with CRC present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (synchronous metastases) and 50-60% of the patients with CRC will develop metastatic disease during the course of their illness. First line treatment of metastatic CRC includes Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan, in combination with a Fluoropyrimidine and Leucovorin (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI respectively), along with a VEGF targeting agent such as Bevacizumab or EGFR targeting agents such as Cetuximab and Panitumumab. Patients with Stage IV CRC are now routinely analyzed for extended RAS and BRAF mutations. KRAS mutations are predictive of resistance to EGFR targeted therapy. Patients who progress following these therapies are considered to have refractory disease. These patients sometimes are rechallenged with previously administered chemotherapeutic agents, but often receive STIVARGA® (Regorafenib), an oral multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity, or LONSURF® (a fixed dose combination of Trifluridine and Tipiracil). Regorafenib has limited efficacy and its adverse effects, particularly hepatotoxicity and fatigue, may be difficult to manage. Treatment options are limited for those who progress on these therapies and there is therefore a strong unmet clinical need.

The VEGF pathway plays a very important role in the neoangiogenesis associated with tumor proliferation. Antiangiogenic agents targeting the VEGF pathway inhibit new blood vessel growth and lead to vascular regression, tumor vessel normalization and constriction, in addition to offsetting the ability of chemotherapy to induce VEGF. This benefit was noted in the SUNLIGHT trial which demonstrated longer Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival among patients with refractory metastatic CRC, treated with LONSURF® plus Bevacizumab, compared to LONSURF® alone (N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1657-1667).

Fruquintinib is a highly selective and potent, oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR1/2/3. Fruquintinib was designed to have enhanced selectivity that limits off-target kinase activity, allowing for high drug exposure, sustained target inhibition, and flexibility for the potential use as part of combination therapy.

The present FDA approved was based on two Phase III trials, FRESCO and FRESCO-2. FRESCO is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trial conducted in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral Fruquintinib, as third-line or later therapy in patients with metastatic CRC. It should be noted that unlike treatment patterns in North America and Europe, VEGF inhibitors such as Bevacizumab and Aflibercept are not routinely integrated into first- or second-line therapy in China. In this study 416 eligible patients (N=416) who had tumor progression following treatment regimens that included Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan were randomly assigned to receive Fruquintinib 5 mg (N=278) or placebo (N=138), both in combination with best supportive care, given orally once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off in 28-day cycles, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by prior use of VEGF inhibitor treatment (yes versus no) and K-ras mutational status (wild type versus mutated). The mean age was 55 years and most baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and prior treatments were similar between the treatment groups. Over 65% of patients had liver metastases. The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary efficacy endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate, Duration of Response and Safety.

The median Overall Survival was significantly prolonged with Fruquintinib compared with placebo (9.3 months versus 6.6 months; HR for death=0.65; P<0.001). The median PFS was also significantly increased with Fruquintinib (3.7 months versus 1.8 months; HR for progression or death=0.26; P<0.001).

The FRESCO-2 study is a global, multi-regional, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial conducted separately in the U.S., Europe, Japan and Australia among patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. The reason for this trial was that practice patterns are different in these countries compared to China, with VEGF inhibitors such as Bevacizumab routinely integrated into first- or second-line therapy in these countries. In this study, 691 eligible patients (N=691) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive Fruquintinib 5 mg (N=461) or matched placebo (N=230) orally once daily on days 1–21 in 28-day cycles, plus best supportive care. Patients received therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. This study included histologically or cytologically documented metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who had received all current standard approved cytotoxic and targeted therapies and progressed on or were intolerant to LONSURF® or Regorafenib, or both. Patients had received a median of 4 lines of previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and 73% of the eligible patients had received more than 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Patients were stratified based on previous therapy with LONSURF® or Regorafenib, or both, RAS mutation status, and duration of metastatic disease. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Duration of Response.

This study met its Primary endpoint and the median OS was 7.4 months in the Fruquintinib group versus 4.8 months in the placebo group (HR=0.66; P<0.0001). This represented a 34% reduction in the risk of death in the Fruquintinib group. The median PFS in the Fruquintinib group was 3.7 months which was also statistically significant. The median Duration of Response was 10.7 months, the Disease Control Rate was 56%, and 41% of patients were alive at 9 months. The most common Grade 3 or worse adverse events in the Fruquintinib group included hypertension (14%)), asthenia (8%), and hand-foot syndrome (6%).

Both FRESCO and FRESCO-2 trials demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in Overall Survival, and Progression Free Survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, when treated with Fruquintinib. This innovative therapy fulfills an unmet need and provides a new treatment option for this heavily pretreated group of patients.

Effect of Fruquintinib vs Placebo on Overall Survival in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-The FRESCO Randomized Clinical Trial. Li J, Qin S, Xu R_H, et al. JAMA. 2018;319:2486-2496.

Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Dasari A, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al. Lancet. 2023;402:41-53. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00772-9.

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO Congress 2023: Perioperative OPDIVO® Plus Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Resectable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 238,340 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 127,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

The 5-year survival rate for patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the US is about 25%, which is a significant improvement over the past 5 years, in part due to earlier detection from lung cancer screening, reduction in smoking, advances in diagnostic and surgical procedures, as well as the introduction of new therapies. However, the 5-year survival rate remains significantly lower among communities of color at 20%. Early detection and screening remain an important unmet need, as 44% of lung cancer cases are not found until they are advanced. In the US, only 5.8% of those individuals at high risk were screened in 2021.

Surgical resection is the primary treatment for approximately 25% of patients with NSCLC who present with early Stage (I–IIIA) disease. These patients are often treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to eradicate micrometastatic disease and decrease the risk of recurrence. However, conventional neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy provides only a 5% absolute improvement in Overall Survival (OS) at 5 years and 45-75% of these patients develop recurrent disease. There is therefore an unmet need for this patient population.

Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options, by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival, across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell Death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. Biomarkers predicting responses to ICIs include Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Mismatch Repair (MMR) status, and Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression.

Nivolumab (OPDIVO®) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor which is highly expressed on activated T cells, and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 or PD-L2 on tumor cells, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the T cells. Combining cytotoxic chemotherapy with a PD 1 inhibitor therapy may augment the antitumor immune response through cell-death induced increased tumor antigenicity and reduction of Treg mediated immune suppression.

In the CheckMate 816 Phase III trial, neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in earlier stage resectable NSCLC resulted in a marked improvement in pathologic Complete Response rate, with a statistically significant improvement in the Event Free Survival among those receiving Nivolumab plus chemotherapy group, compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone.

CheckMate 77T, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative Nivolumab + chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. In this study, 461 patients (N=461) with untreated, resectable Stage IIA (more than 4 cm)-IIIB (N2) NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Nivolumab 360 mg IV every 3 weeks plus four cycles of histology-based platinum doublet chemotherapy followed by surgery, and adjuvant Nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks for 1 year (N=229), or placebo IV every 3 weeks plus four cycles of histology-based platinum doublet chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant placebo IV every 4 weeks for 1 year (N=232). Enrolled patients had no prior systemic anticancer treatment and no EGFR or ALK mutations. Patients were stratified according to histology, disease stage, and tumor PD-L1 expression (less than 1% versus 1% or more) and patients with brain metastasis were excluded. The median age was 66 years, and both treatment groups were well balanced. Approximately two-thirds had Stage III disease, more than 50% of patients had tumor PD-L1 expression of 1% or more, and about 40% of patients had PD-L1 expression less than 1%. Approximately 90% were current or former smokers and majority of patients (75%) received Carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Surgery was performed within 6 weeks following the last dose of neoadjuvant therapy and radiologic restaging. The Primary endpoint of this study was Event Free Survival (EFS) according to Blinded Independent Central Review. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival, pathologic Complete Response, Major Pathologic Response (10% or less of viable tumor cells remaining at time of surgery), and Safety. The researchers presented the data from the first interim prespecified analysis of Event-Free Survival.

At a median follow-up of 25.4 months, approximately 78% in the Nivolumab/chemotherapy group and 77% in the placebo/chemotherapy group were able to undergo definitive surgery. Lobectomy was the most common type of surgery performed and about 90% of patients had a complete resection. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved Event-Free Survival, compared to placebo plus chemotherapy (median Not Reached versus 18.4 months respectively; HR=0.58; P=00025). This represented a 42% improvement in Event-Free Survival among those treated with Nivolumab plus chemotherapy. The 12-month Event-Free Survival rate was 73% versus 59%, respectively and the 18-month Event-Free Survival rate was 70% versus 50%. The pathologic Complete Response rates as well as Major Pathologic Response rates were significantly higher with Nivolumab plus chemotherapy, compared to placebo plus chemotherapy (25.3% versus 4.7% and 35.4% versus 12.1% repectively). Surgery related adverse events were similar in both treatment groups at 12%.

The researchers concluded that CheckMate 77T met its primary endpoint and is the first Phase III perioperative study that builds on the current standard of care, neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus chemotherapy. Patient with early stage resectable NSCLC now have three different treatment options: 1) Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery 2) Surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, and 3) Now perioperative therapy, which includes neoadjuvant therapy, surgery, and adjuvant therapy. Circulating tumor DNA and other biomarkers may identify patients who are cured with chemoimmunotherapy and in whom adjuvant therapy can be avoided.

CheckMate 77T: Phase III study comparing neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs neoadjuvant placebo plus chemo followed by surgery and adjuvant NIVO or placebo for previously untreated, resectable stage II–IIIb NSCLC. Cascone T, Awad M, Spicer J, et al. ESMO Congress 2023. Abstract LBA1. Presented on October 21, 2023.

First Line REBLOZYL® Superior to Epoetin Alfa in Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

RR

SUMMARY: It is estimated that in the US approximately 13,000 people are diagnosed with MyeloDysplastic Syndromes (MDS) each year. The prevalence has been estimated to be from 60,000 to 170,000 in the US. MyeloDysplastic Syndromes are a heterogenous group of stem cell disorders characterized by marrow failure resulting in cytopenias, mainly symptomatic anemia, with associated cytogenetic abnormalities, and abnormal cellular maturation with morphologic changes in clonal cells. Majority of the individuals diagnosed with MDS are 65 years or older and die as a result of infection and/or bleeding, consequent to bone marrow failure. About a third of patients with MDS develop Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Patients with Lower-risk MDS (Revised IPSS-Very Low, Low, or Intermediate risk ) often present with symptomatic anemia and these patients are in chronic need for RBC transfusions which in turn can result in iron overload and can have a negative impact on quality of life and Overall Survival. These patients are treated with Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs) as first line therapy. ESAs such as Darbepoetin alfa and Epoetin alfa are re-engineered and recombinant DNA technology products of Erythropoietin (EPO), and they stimulate erythropoiesis by binding and activating the EPO receptor. However, transfusion-dependent patients with serum EPO levels above 200 U per liter are less likely to respond to ESAs. Additionally, patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts have a shorter median duration of response to ESAs, than those who do not have ring sideroblasts. Patients with Lower-risk MDS with chromosome 5q deletion (del 5q) who are transfusion dependent are treated with Lenalidomide, regardless of previous treatment with ESAs. In contrast, only 39% of patients with non-del(5q) Lower-risk MDS receive second line therapy besides RBC transfusions, and there are few treatment options for patients who are refractory to, unresponsive to, or ineligible for ESAs. There is therefore an unmet clinical need for safe and effective treatment options, to reduce the RBC transfusion burden in these patients.

Signaling by the SMAD2 and SMAD3 pathway exerts an inhibitory effect on red cell maturation. This pathway is constitutively activated in the bone marrow cells of patients with MDS and diseases associated with ineffective erythropoiesis such as β-thalassemia. Luspatercept (REBLOZYL®) is a recombinant soluble fusion protein and is first-in-class erythroid maturation agent that enhances erythropoiesis by promoting late-stage Red Blood Cell precursor differentiation and maturation. It targets select Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β superfamily ligands such as GDF11, that regulate late-stage erythropoiesis. This results in a reduction in aberrant SMAD2 and SMAD3 signaling, thereby promoting late-stage RBC precursor differentiation and maturation. In the MEDALIST trial, Luspatercept significantly reduced the severity of anemia in patients with Lower-risk MDS with Ring Sideroblasts, who had been RBC transfusion-dependent, and who had disease that was refractory to, or unlikely to respond to ESAs.

COMMANDS trial is a global, randomized, controlled, open-label Phase III study, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Luspatercept in ESA-naive patients with Low Risk-MDS. This study included 354 eligible patients with lower-risk MDS as defined by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) criteria, with or without Ringed Sideroblasts. These patients had less than 5% bone marrow blasts and serum EPO levels less than 500 U/L and required red blood cell transfusions (defined as 2–6 RBC units/8 weeks for at least 8 weeks immediately prior to randomization). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Luspatercept (starting dose 1.0 mg/kg, titration up to 1.75 mg/kg) subcutaneous, once every 3 weeks for at least 24 weeks (N=178) or Epoetin alfa (starting dose 450 IU/kg, titration up to 1050 IU/kg, with a maximum permitted total dose of 80 000 IU)) weekly for at least 24 weeks (N=176). The median patient age was 74 years and both treatment groups were well balanced. Patients were stratified by baseline RBC transfusion burden (less than 4 units per 8 weeks versus 4 or more units per 8 weeks), endogenous serum EPO concentration (200 U/L or less versus more than 200 to less than 500 U/L), and Ring Sideroblast status (positive versus negative). The Primary endpoint was RBC independence for at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean hemoglobin increase of at least 1.5 g/dL within the first 24 weeks.

At the planned interim analysis of 301 patients, 147 patients in the Luspatercept group and 154 patients in the Epoetin alfa group completed 24 weeks of treatment or discontinued earlier and the median treatment duration was 41.6 weeks for Luspatercept and 27.0 weeks for Epoetin alfa. Luspatercept was superior in efficacy compared to Epoetin alfa. Among patients receiving Luspatercept at the planned interim analysis, 58.5% achieved RBC transfusion independence for at least a 12-week consecutive period within the first 24 weeks, along with an increase in hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL compared to 31.2% of patients receiving Epoetin alpha (P<0.0001). Luspatercept was effective regardless of baseline serum EPO, red blood cell transfusion burden, SF3B1 mutation status, or Ring Sideroblast status. These results were similar when comparisons of baseline serum erythropoietin and baseline RBC transfusion burden in subgroups were made. However, responses were different based on ring sideroblast status. Approximately 65% of Ringed Sideroblast positive patients on Luspatercept achieved the Primary endpoint compared to 26% on Epoetin alfa. Among Ringed Sideroblast negative patients, slightly more met this end point on Epoetin alfa (46% versus 41% respectively). The Secondary endpoints in the study included Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid Response of 8 weeks or more and RBC transfusion independence at 24 weeks or more and at 12 weeks or more. Similar to the Primary endpoint, Luspatercept was more effective than Epoetin alfa across these Secondary endpoints.

It was concluded from this interim analysis that compared with Epoetin alfa, Luspatercept significantly improved RBC transfusion independence, and erythroid response, as well as duration of response, with no new toxiciites. The authors added that this innovative therapy with Luspatercept could represent a new standard of care for patients with RBC transfusion dependent Low Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Long-term follow up will be needed to confirm these results and further refine findings in patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes, including non-mutated SF3B1 or Ring Sideroblast-negative subgroups.

Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. The Lancet. 2023; 402:373-385

FDA Approves Nivolumab for Adjuvant Treatment of Stage IIB/C Melanoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on October 13, 2023, approved Nivolumab (OPDIVO®) for the adjuvant treatment of completely resected Stage IIB/C melanoma in patients 12 years and older. The American Cancer Society’s estimates that for 2023, about 97,610 new cases of melanoma of the skin will be diagnosed in the United States and 7,990 people are expected to die of the disease. The rates of melanoma have been rising rapidly over the past few decades, but this has varied by age. Surgical resection with a curative intent is the standard of care for patients with early stage melanoma.

Patients with resected Stage IIB/C disease comprise a significant group of patients at significant risk of recurrence. Patients with Stage IIB disease have primary tumors that are more than 2 mm and 4 mm or less in thickness with ulceration (T3b) or more than 4 mm in thickness without ulceration (T4a). Patients with Stage IIC disease have primary tumors more than 4 mm in thickness with ulceration (T4b). Although Stage II melanoma is less advanced than Stage III, the 5-year risk of recurrence in patients with stage IIB or Stage IIC disease without adjuvant therapy is approximately 35% and 50% respectively. The 5-year Melanoma-Specific Survival (MSS) rates for patients with Stage IIB/IIC disease are similar to those for Stage IIIA, Stage IIIB and Stage IIIC disease.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are the standard of care adjuvant treatment for high-risk, resected, Stage III melanoma. In the KEYNOTE-054 trial, the 5-year Relapse Free Survival (RFS) with adjuvant Pembrolizumab was 55.4% versus 38.3% with placebo, in patients with completely resected, Stage IIIA (more than 1 mm lymph node metastasis), IIIB or IIIC Melanoma. In the CHECKMATE-238 trial, the 4-year RFS rate was of 51.7% for Nivolumab versus 41.2% for ipilimumab among patients with resected Stage IIIB/C and IV melanoma.

CHECKMATE-76K is an ongoing, randomized, double-blind, Phase III study conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected Stage IIB/C melanoma. In this study, 790 eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to Nivolumab 480 mg (N=526) or placebo (N=264) by IV infusion every 4 weeks for up to 1 year or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Patient characteristics at baseline were well balanced between treatment groups and 50.5% had nodular melanoma, 39% had Stage IIC disease and patients were stratified by tumor category. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) and Safety.

At a minimum follow up of 7.8 months, CheckMate 76K met its primary endpoint and Nivolumab significantly improved RFS versus placebo. Nivolumab demonstrated a 58% reduction in the risk of recurrence or death versus placebo in patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma (HR = 0.42; P < 0.0001). The 12-month RFS was 89.0% for nivolumab and 79.4% for placebo. The benefit with nivolumab over placebo was observed across all pre-specified subgroups, including all disease Stages and T-category subgroups. Adjuvant Nivolumab demonstrated significant benefit in those with stage IIC disease, head and neck primaries or nodular disease, who are all considered to be at a higher absolute recurrence risk. Additionally, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in the Distant Metastasis-Free Survival with Nivolumab versus placebo (HR = 0.47). Further, a lower proportion of patients treated with nivolumab had multiple lesions detected at first recurrence versus those treated with placebo (3.4% versus 9.1%). Adverse events were similar to that observed in patients with resected stage III or stage IV disease and similar to the established anti-PD-1 monotherapy profile.

It was concluded that adjuvant Nivolumab significantly improved Relapse Free Survival as well as Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in patients with resected Stage IIB/C melanoma and this clinical benefit was observed across disease subgroups, including all T categories.

Adjuvant nivolumab in resected stage IIB/C melanoma: primary results from the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 76K trial. Kirkwood, J.M., Del Vecchio, M., Weber, J. et al. Nat Med (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02583-2

Amivantamab plus Chemotherapy with and without Lazertinib after Progression on Osimertinib in Advanced Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 238,340 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 127,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer. Approximately 10-15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR mutations and 90% of these mutations are either exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation in exon 21.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in regulating cell proliferation, survival and differentiation, and is overexpressed in a variety of epithelial malignancies. EGFR targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as Gefitinib, Erlotinib, Afatinib, Dacomitinib and Osimertinib target the EGFR signaling cascade. However, patients eventually will develop drug resistance due to new EGFR mutations. Another important cause of drug resistance to TKIs is due to the activation of parallel RTK (Receptor Tyrosine Kinase) pathways such as Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition factor (HGF/MET) pathway, thereby bypassing EGFR TKI inhibitors. These patients are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy as the next line of therapy, resulting in a median Progression Free Survival of 5 months.

Amivantamab (RYBREVANT®) is a fully-human bispecific antibody directed against EGFR and MET receptors. Amivantamab binds extracellularly and simultaneously blocks ligand-induced phosphorylation of EGFR and c-MET, inhibiting tumor growth and promoting tumor cell death. Further, Amivantamab downregulates receptor expression on tumor cells thus preventing drug resistance mediated by new emerging mutations of EGFR or c-MET. By binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor protein, Amivantamab can bypass primary and secondary TKI resistance at the active site. Amivantamab also engages effector cells such as Natural Killer cells, monocytes, and macrophages via its optimized Fc domain. Amivantamab demonstrated activity against a wide range of activating and resistance mutations in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and in patients with MET exon 14 skip mutations, and is approved for the treatment of patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, whose disease progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Lazertinib is a highly selective, third-generation TKI that penetrates the CNS, with demonstrated efficacy in activating EGFR mutations and acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation. Combining Amivantamab with Lazertinib has been shown to provide a synergistic benefit by targeting the extracellular and catalytic EGFR domains. In early phase studies, Amivantamab plus chemotherapy and Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy demonstrated an Objective Response Rate of 44% and 50% in advanced and refractory NSCLC, and in patients whose disease had progressed on prior TKIs, respectively.

MARIPOSA-2 is a global, randomized, Phase 3 trial, conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Amivantamab plus chemotherapy and Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, whose disease had progressed on or after Osimertinib monotherapy. Amivantamab is a large molecule and was not expected to readily cross the blood-brain barrier. This was one of the main reasons for the addition of Lazertinib, a known CNS-active TKI, to Amivantamab plus chemotherapy. A total of 657 patients (N=657) with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutations) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, after disease progression on Osimertinib, were randomized 2:2:1 to receive either Amivantamab along with Lazertinib and chemotherapy (N=263), chemotherapy alone (N=263), or Amivantamab plus chemotherapy (N=131). Patients received Amivantamab 1400 mg IV (1750 mg for body weight 80 kg or greater) weekly for the first 4 weeks, then 1750 mg (2100 mg for body weight 80 kg or greater) every 3 weeks starting at cycle 3 (week 7). The first Amivantamab infusion was split over 2 days, with 350 mg IV on cycle 1, day 1 and the remainder on cycle 1, day 2. Lazertinib was administered at 240 mg orally daily. Chemotherapy consisted of Carboplatin AUC5 IV, starting on day 1 every 3 weeks for the first 4 cycles along with Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks until disease progression. The median age was 62 years, 48% of patients were Asian, about 45% of patients had a history of brain metastases, and approximately 70% of patients had Osimertinib as first line treatment and 30% had Osimertinib as second line treatment. Randomization was stratified by Osimertinib line of therapy (first or second), race (Asian or non-Asian), and history of brain metastasis (yes or no). All three treatment groups were well balanced. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Amivantamab plus chemotherapy and Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy, versus chemotherapy alone. Secondary endpoints included Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, Overall Survival (OS) and Safety.

At a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the PFS was significantly longer for Amivantamab plus chemotherapy and Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (HR for disease progression or death=0.48 and 0.44, respectively; P<0.001 for both; median of 6.3 and 8.3 versus 4.2 months, respectively). The Objective Response Rate was significantly higher for Amivantamab plus chemotherapy and Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (64% and 63% versus 36%, respectively; P<0.001 for both). The median intracranial PFS was 12.5 and 12.8 versus 8.3 months for Amivantamab plus chemotherapy and Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (HR for intracranial disease progression or death=0.55 and 0.58, respectively). The researchers postulated that the mechanism by which Amivantamab improves intracranial PFS could either be through direct antitumor effects or indirectly through immune-based mechanisms. The most common adverse events with the Amivantamab combinations were cytopenias, infusion-related reactions and venous thromboembolism. The researchers recommend prophylactic anticoagulation.

It was concluded that Amivantamab plus chemotherapy, as well as Amivantamab, Lazertinib plus chemotherapy, significantly improved Progression Free Survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS, compared with chemotherapy alone, in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with disease progression on or after Osimertinib. The authors added that MARIPOSA-2 is the first study to demonstrate improved PFS versus chemotherapy, after disease progression on Osimertinib.

Amivantamab plus chemotherapy with and without lazertinib in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib: Primary results from the phase 3 MARIPOSA-2 study. Passaro A, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. Annals of Oncology. 2023. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.117